Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is a genius

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ammonium Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:29 AM
Original message
Obama is a genius
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 01:42 AM by Ammonium
Okay so like a month ago there was the Kyl-Lieberman bill that was passed calling Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. The only democrat in the senate who voted for it was, just guess...Hillary Clinton. Hillary was roundly trampled in the Democratic debate this past tuesday for especially being an enabler for Bush should he decide to go after Iran as terrorists.

So this evening Obama introduced a bill that basically says Bush has no authority to go to war with Iran. Brilliant! What Obama has done is basically pull Hillary between a rock and a hard place and it's so amazing. She can either A)vote in favor of Obama's resolution(presumably with the rest of her democratic friends) and then try to explain how she hasn't flip flopped between her earlier vote for Kye-Lieberman and Obama's resolution or B)vote against it and explain how she is not enabling bush and perpetuating the march to war with Iran. omg it's political genius!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071102/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. was she the only one for the it. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. No. Only 22 were against it, not including
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 02:17 AM by Basileus Basileon
Mr. Obama's phantom disapproval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ammonium Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Subject
I didn't do a good job of specifying Clinton was the only senator running for president that voted for Kyl-Lieberman.

Lets be frank. If mr. Bush wants to level Iran he clearly thinks he has the authority to do so, so until Congress decides to impeach Bush has demonstrated he will do whatever he wants. It really doesn't matter what congress does or what bill they pass. Welcome to the unitary executive.

I'm sorry you got your feelings hurt for Mrs. Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. No, you posted a lie.
Nothing to do with "feelings."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would be even more ingenious if his bill wasn't derived from a
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 01:41 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
letter to the president Jim Webb drafted and that Hillary and 29 other Senators signed and that Obama didn't sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Amazing isn't it?
If not derived, at least similar in intent. If he's working from some sort of strategy lately, it's eluding me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. All four senator/candidates should get on the same page on Iran and
stay there. If this sending messages to Bush stuff is so important then is not good to have splits developed for political reasons.

But nobody wants to take it off the table... it's campaign fodder.

Notice that the OP was utterly unconcerned with any real-world effect of this "genius"... just the politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah, why didn't he sign Webb's letter? He still could have introduced
his bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. A letter sounds like "pretty, please" to someone who isn't listening, and has no force of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. He still could have done both. Sign the letter and file the bill.
Or do you consider Boxer, Webb, Kerry, Durbin,Dodd (apologies for the 25 others I forgot)... as idiots and lightweight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No, I do not, but I see sending Bush letters, rather than binding legislation, as ineffective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. Good
then you'll be comforted to know that Kyl-Lieberman was a non-binding resolution, with no force of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. What made you think Hillary was the only Dem to vote for it? It passed 76-22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Obviously...
they meant the only Senator named Clinton or Obama to vote for it, or vote at all....err wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps he will be around to sign his own bill...
he seems to be in absentia when all other votes take place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Perhaps the
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 05:55 AM by JTFrog
majority leader could give out accurate information to presidential candidates about when an item is actually scheduled for vote.

*edit - I mean to all presidential candidates, not just the one his son works for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Pssst every other Dem Senator who was a candidate was there
And I love how that BS story is passed around as truth.

1st thing that morning Reid announced they were going to try and get a vote again. They voted at 12:45.

Obama never planned to be at the vote, he left for Maine before they had even finished debating the night before and planned to stay there until the debate in NH that day.

He expected everyone that was running in the Senate to vote no and the bill was going pass regardless of his no vote.

What surprised him was Hillary voting Yes. It was an unexpected gift, but yes because he was not at the vote he cannot lend it too much importance.

Now let me ask you something.

Why would Reid in an attempt to give Hillary "political cover" for her yes vote schedule a vote that did not include Obama but was to be held the day before a major debate in New Hampshire. Does that make any sense? Make sure Obama misses the vote but schedule the vote the day of the debate so its fresh meat for the other candidates to hammer her on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Do you think you will get an answer to your VERY valid questions?
I've been waiting for a while...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama has the moves. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. a nice guy, but NO genius.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
GOBAMA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Because, of course, Reid will put this bill to a vote?
I think Obama did something positive to clarify his position, though he could have co-sponsored Webb's bill that does basically the same thing, of course. However, there is basically 0 chance that Reid put any of the two to a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I think you might be right about Reid. Webb's bill, tho, is sitting in Joe Biden's committee.
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 12:20 PM by flpoljunkie
The foreign relations committee, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silence Dogood Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. any idea how many senators have signed on?
Dodd, Biden, Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm for anything that will prevent Bush from broadening his...
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 12:33 PM by polichick
...reign of terror ~ so, kudos Obama!

(Although this doesn't get you off the hook for not voting in the first place.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. Obama did not cast a vote on this Iran bill....he was
on the campaign trail and when asked why he did not vote he said" I was not informed about this vote until today and I could not get back to Washington".....But a funny thing can happen to people that LIE, they get caught and Obama was informed about the vote on this bill the night before the Senate ended for the day....

I do thank you
Ben David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. can you prove that?
it was my understanding that obama DID show up for the vote only to find out it was canceled. and after harry reid stated there wasn't going to be another vote in the near future, obama continued on with his campaign plans. obama ended up getting only a 1 hour warning before the actual vote, but by that time he was already up in new hampshire, and could not have gotten back in time.

i have seen links but cannot find them. i will continue to look.

in the meantime, could you provide yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yeah, continue searching for "proof"...O.J. Simpson is searching for the "real" killer too...
we are all waiting with baited breath.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. and i'm waiting for proof that the opposite is true
sorry i do not bookmark every single piece of information i read...

but harry reid, a politician, whose son is a high level clinton campaign worker, would never ever play preferential politics, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Obama failed to vote...
you need proof of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. no
that he knew of the vote the night before, as the post i responded to claimed.

it has been widely circulated that the kyl/lieberman vote was scheduled last minute. that post was the first time i had heard that it was scheduled the night before. i am asking for a reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. YOU asserted that Harry Reid tricked Obama...
and that because of Reid's son, Hillary was given advance warning of the vote...did you find proof of that? You're saying that Reid bamboozled Obama. I'm just wondering if you have proof to that...if you do, I'd love to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. Rev. Donnie McClosetCase agrees....Obama is a genius
What a cunning strategy to give an "ex-gay" clown a microphone and ample time to spew homophobic filth to a captive audience. And just look at the results!


Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Clinton Obama Edwards Spread
RCP Average 09/26 - 10/29 39.0 24.0 12.7 Clinton +15.0
ARG 10/26 10/29 41 19 18 Clinton +22.0
Winthrop Univ. 10/07 - 10/28 33 23 10 Clinton +10.0
Rasmussen 09/26 - 09/27 43 30 10 Clinton +13.0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/sc/south_carolina_democratic_primary-234.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC