Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Aides admit to using gender as a distraction from double talking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:42 PM
Original message
Clinton Aides admit to using gender as a distraction from double talking
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 04:35 PM by jsamuel
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2007/11/02/playing_the_gender_card_is_part_of_clinton_strategy.html

Aides to Sen. Hillary Clinton told the Associated Press that there is "a clear and long-planned strategy to fend off attacks by accusing her male rivals of gathering against her. The idea is to change the subject while making Clinton a sympathetic figure, especially among female voters who often feel outnumbered and bullied on the job."


See the Double Talking here, don't get distracted.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=66591&mesg_id=66591
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the most disgusting tactic a woman candidate can use.This is revolting.
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 03:44 PM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Totally agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. As opposed to vote for me, I'm the white Southerner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. don't forget
his father was a mill worker or something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Well Hillary's was a Republican e business owner! She doesn't stress that much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. back in the day
when republican didn't mean Evangelical Christian or batshit crazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. You're right; they were the benign type who just said "fuck the little people"
However, H. Rodham was a GOLDWATER GIRL. And the Goldwater campaign was the beginning of the wingnut movement in the republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. At least he is a white southerner.Hillary isn't anyone's "victim".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. same concept. if she can't stand up to the scrutiny as the frontrunner,
don't bloody run. WOmen get enough crap legitimately about stuff when they try and do something without one of our own doing it on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. So she has to run like a man?
Howard Dean

"thanked Gore "particularly those words that said that the 11th Commandment now also ought to apply to Democrats. As you know, I've been picking buckshot out of my rear end in some of these debates, and we're going up to New Hampshire tonight and see if I do some more."

She can't complain about being ganged up on just because she is a woman?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. no. it doesn't matter that she's a female. whoever was the leader
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 05:31 PM by roguevalley
would be in the same place this time of the season. the front runner gets the hits. she needs to stand up and take them and not fall back
on such a cheap tactic. Any man or woman in her place as frontrunner
would be the target. Period. This makes her look weak and gives the
other side not only ugly sound bites but a tactic: She whines about
all the big bad candidates now. What about when she faces the big bad
men of the world? Bad tactic, Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Waaaa...Waaaa... Waaa...the boys are being mean to me!!!!!...
Yeah....thats going to get votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. She isn't being ganged up on because she is a woman
and no matter how often it is repeated, it still isn't true.

She is being challenged on the issues (and her non answers on them). To suggest that her triangulating ways should be given a pass BECAUSE she is a woman is a horrifying thought to its core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. *One post on one Blog* is the highpoint of the Edwards campaign?
:rofl: SomeWackjobBlogger/Edwards '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL...I love how this is cast as a shocking revelation.
The Clinton campaign had kept her rivals at bay precisely because they were afraid of what happened to Lazio. Its why attacks on Hillary from the Edwards camp first came thru Elizabeth with John refraining from attacking Clinton directly until the last month or so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. And yet, after all that effort and planning, she blows it.
Now she's busy denying the gender card is being used at all. Just the victim card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Actually its working quite well.
Its why Obama put out an OPED detailing his work against domestic violence the very next day even though he was not the most aggressive in the debate.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. She has lost all credibility as a feminist and she insults women everywhere by playing "victim".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Watch next week when her numbers go up with women.
But it was nice to see Edwards stop hiding behind his wife for a change.

So good for your guy for finally showing some testicular fortitiude!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Oh yeah?
Well Edwards insults my female black ass every time he tells people to "just imagine" Obama or Clinton on the ticket, vote for me, I'm "electable". (I'm white and male).

Your candidate, frankly, is more full of total bullshit than anyone running and for this bunch of politicians, that is saying a lot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. it never ceases to amaze me
how easily disgusted/offended/enraged/sickened/add your own negative emotion here Edwards supporters seem to get. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. There goes the "Hillary is tough" talking point.
You can't be boasting about your toughness while whining that other candidates won't let you get away with contradicting yourself. Unless, of course, her campaign would like to be called out on even more double talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't believe anything the fucking AP says about any democrat
And I find it very hard to believe her aides are telling reporters their campaign strategy, for chrissakes.

Not that I care if she is, frankly. It's a political campaign and she will use any advantage. It's what ALL politicians do.

I come from poor people, mill workers, immigrants, I'm one of "you".

I'm mixed race and love everybody.

I'm a white male and electable.

I've suffered so I feel your pain.

They are going after me because: I tell the truth, I'm the front runner, they are republicans in disguise, the media hates me, it's part of a plot to keep YOU down through me, I want to stop the war, they hate me because I'm beautiful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. A short-term solution at best
it would ruin her in the GE if she tried it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Why would she? In the GE, its one on one.
Here she gets to cast it as me against the boys.

The boys lose in that argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. This is so revolting. Why can't she use her qualifications instead of competing in a way that
denigrates women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Qualifications? This race is about qualifications?
How can it be when Edwards pretends he was never in the Senate?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Oh poor Saracat so offended...
:cry:

Qualifications? With John Edwards running as fast as he can away from his own record it is kind of ironic that qualifications is what you are basing your support of him on


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. Because being a woman is her only qualification?
Seems to be what her message is (or as best can be deciphered)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Sounds like part of the package to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I doubt it.
It worked with Lazio because of how Lazio approached Clinton.

I don't see a GOPer doing that.

I think she went into the debate prepared for the wrong battle. She wanted to try and remain above the fray when instead she should have done more counterpunching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. That's correct...she never fought back so the focus stayed entirely on her
That won't happen again; should make a for an interesting gathering on the 15th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okamichan13 Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Her campaign admits it
while she denied it in New Hampshire today.

Geez, what a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yup, and here's that link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hmmmmm
the politics of distraction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't believe it and if it is true, then Hillary's strategy has just imploded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm not a big fan of reporters who use the "source who cannot be named"
angle when posting accusations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. From the AP story:
"Clinton's advisers, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss internal matters, said there is a clear and long-planned strategy to fend off attacks by accusing her male rivals of gathering against her."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071101/ap_po/on_deadline_clinton_1

An AP story based on anonymous sources is on shakey legs, especially since I can't believe Clinton's advisors would reveal a campaign strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Quote anonymous sources with Obama and Edwards...
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 04:16 PM by SaveElmer
And their supporters cry like stuck pigs...

When it is Hillary, why it is Gospel...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. I'm an Edwards supporter
and I agree this story is highly questionable for the reasons others have stated.

And the reality is that there IS sexism in politics and elsewhere in society. So I think it's reasonable that Clinton would talk about it, and the other candidates should too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. My, my...
This sounds like one very confident campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. Some aides nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
42. What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say
This is proof of an extremely chickenshit tactic; I thought they were somewhat competent. So much for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC