Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:26 AM
Original message |
OK. Say the election is between Giuliani and Clinton ... who wins? |
|
Doesn't seem nearly as clear cut as it might be.
And what happens to the country afterwards?
|
Flabbergasted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
My cynical response right now. Who cares? There platforms are effectively identical.
|
denem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. Federal Depts cut 10%, workforce by 20%, cut personal, corp taxes |
|
"Win" Iraq. School vouches. Reform Schools. A long term vision 43% reduction of all Federal Employees.Yeah Thats sounds like HRC alright.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. You Forgot The Appointment Of Strict Constructionist Judges |
BlueStater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It's still too early to know how this thing will play out.
Most people still aren't familar with Rudy outside of his phony "9/11 hero/America's mayor/whatever" image.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:36 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The Corporations win. n/t |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
18. the American people lose n/t |
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:38 AM
Response to Original message |
4. You are asking the wrong people |
|
If you want to know who is going to win, history will tell you... whoever DU hates the most.
Hillary will win. Put money on it, if she gets the nomination.
|
last_texas_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:41 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I would predict that it would almost be a repeat of the 2000 election |
|
I think Clinton would have a fair shot at most of the states Gore carried, maybe minus one or two (New Mexico, maybe?), but I think she'd be likely to carry New Hampshire because of how it has been trending recently. However, I don't think she would be able to prevail against Giuliani in Ohio, and the race might be too close for comfort in Pennsylvania (though maybe I'm not giving Pennsylvanians enough credit.) But, essentially, I think there is a good chance it would unfortunately come down to Florida as the determining factor, and I'm not sure which way it would be most likely to go.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. There's every reason to think she could prevail in Ohio, where the |
|
people have kicked Ken Blackwell out, and the Dems have made a strong resurgence.
But election fraud will be a concern everywhere across the country.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
20. She's Winning In Ohio, Florida, And Pennsylvania |
|
And she's winning in Pennsylvania by thirteen points...
|
last_texas_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
50. I have seen many of the poll results that you cite |
|
And if Clinton is our nominee, I will be very happy to see those results stay the same throughout the election season. However, I'm not particularly trusting of polls this far ahead of the election, largely because I remember several states in '04 that Kerry generally led in the polls through most of the election season that ended up going for * on Election Day. It just seems like states don't seem to change their voting habits too strongly from one election to the other, and I think if Giuliani would have increased strength anywhere it would be in some of the Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern swing states.
|
bklyncowgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
59. 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 (it was all Clinton's fault) |
|
The right wing has been setting up this story line for the past few years. Remember that ABC miniseries which pretty much blamed Bill for the rise of Osama Bin Laden.
The Clintons will of course, fight back. Bill & Hillary are not sissies but their main defense will be something like, "We tried to get Bin Laden but the Republicans had us so tied up with unfounded scandal investigations that we couldn't do what we needed to do."
What scandals? Whitewater, Travelgate, Vince Foster and of course Monica Lewinsky. Now those of us in the reality based community will say that the first three were disproved and the third inconsequential. Sorry, but if those of us in the reality based community were in the clear majority in all major swing states Al Gore or John Kerry would be President today. This will only serve to remind those in the fantasy based community what they hate about Hillary Clinton.
".....If that was MY husband....." There goes the soccer mom vote! We already lost the security moms.
The Clintons of course will point out that George Bush ignored their warnings and that 9/11 could have been stopped. Rudy will point out that he is not George Bush. He is the man who was THERE, America's Mayor, on the streets of his city, leading, comforting and SAVING LIVES!. Members of the reality based community will point out that Rudy was on the streets because he, against the advice of his experts, put his emergency command post under the World Trade Center. It won't matter. Rudy has the pictures to prove his heroism. Imagine the campaign ads they're going to make. Giuliani running through the smoke with the tower collapsing behind me saying "Follow me" (actually I think it was "Come with us" but nevertheless it will make for some compelling 30 footage.)
The Democrats will have the more intellectually compelling argument, the Republicans the more emotionally riveting. In a sane country intellect trumps emotion. In America in 2008?
Hillary's ever shifting position on the Iraq war will enable the Giuliani to target her as politically calculating and unprincipled.
The Democrats will target Giuliani as a loose canon. Advantage? Who knows.
Oh but you say, what about Rudy's three marriages, dressing in drag, etc. Yeah right, the Clinton's are going to harp on someone else's sexual pecadillos. It will probably be a repeat of 92 when the Clintons made it very clear to GHW Bush that any reference to Bill's extracurricular activities would bring on a bombardment to the news media about the special relationship between the president and one Jennifer Fitzgerald. As for Abner Louima and the various other racially charged incidents during Giuliani's administrations--let's just say that in certain circles that's a big, big plus for him.
Could the Democrats beat Rudy? Yes, but it would take someone who was willing to play as dirty as the Republicans (which the Clintons would do better than anyone on the Democratic side) and someone who can challenge Giuliani on his strengths as well as his weaknesses. This could be a problem for Hillary Clinton.
I'm not saying she'd lose but it's not going to be as easy as many Democrats think. I'm also not saying this to bash Hillary. She's not my favorite candidate but if she's the Democratic nominee I will support her in the general election.
You asked me what I think will happen and this is it.
|
FREEWILL56
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:44 AM
Response to Original message |
6. That's a good question. |
|
I don't know, but it sure isn't "we the people".
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 02:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 03:00 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Fairly, Clinton. The idea of the GOP south voting for someone name "Guiliani" ... I don't think so |
|
They'll vote third party or stay home.
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. You know that party is in trouble |
|
When they are even considering nominating a Italian, Catholic, pro-choice former New York mayor because at least he has some tie to their only hope, 9/11 and Fear.
It's actually funny. In a good way.
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
26. You don't know much about the South, do you? |
|
Forget "Gone With the Wind" and all the dumb movies stereotyping Southerners as hicks and racists.
If people who normally vote GOP don't vote for Rudy it won't be because of his Italian name but because of his support for abortion and same sex marriage.
They won't vote for Hillary for the same reasons.
So it's a draw and they'll stay home;
OR if they think Rudy will be influenced by other Republicans to appoint strict constructionist justices to SCOTUS, they'll hold their noses and vote for Rudy;
OR the high negatives that she has in all parts of the US will get people out to vote against her.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
51. Golly, no, my family has only lived in the south for 350 years |
|
My paternal grandmother nearly disowned my father for dating an Italian woman. The entire family had a problem with it. Guiliani has far more "southern" baggage than Hillary does.
I'm voting Edwards in the primary, but if the question is Rudy versus Hillary, Hillary will trounce him.
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 04:16 AM
Response to Original message |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Clinton would win handily |
|
I don't think Giuliani would hold up well to national scrutiny.
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 04:37 AM
Response to Original message |
13. With Rudi + the MEDIA against the most DISLIKED woman in the USA, it's Guliani in a landslide. |
|
They won't need no Diebold to win that one.
It'll be the most HONEST Repub victory in human memory.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. Sometimes I Regret Coming Here |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 06:11 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
The atmosphere is toxic...She will beat Rudi and she will beat him fairly handily...She's beating him now despite fifteen years of negative press while Rudi is treated as some latter day Winston Churchill because he arrived at a disaster scene...
He literally and sadly has turned 9-11 into a punch line...
|
denem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
25. Well I value your voice of reason - dare I say reality. |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 06:22 AM by lamprey
Two things: 1. I still can't see a photo of Bobby without the pain of loss. 2. I wish you would call out John Edwards - you may not say it out loud , but I can barely stand him.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
31. I Liked Edwards (Until) He Started Bashing Other Democrats |
|
Now, he doesn't exist to me...
TY for your remarks about my avatar...I shook his hand when I was six years old... I still have a letter he wrote to me in response to a letter I wrote to him when I was ten... I "love" Bobby, the "liberal" Bobby and the "ruthless" Bobby who would have ate glass for his brother, John...
|
Augdog20
(119 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
27. Times paying attn to Rudy Giuliani's pol. comm. Bernie Kerik mess |
|
Bernie Kerik is under federal and local investigation for links to mob-linked firm(s). New York Times is giving attention to story, about once every 2 weeks. Giuliani stood by him; is his kid's godfather. x( :puke: Times said Giuliani know about Kerik's potential mob links :puke: earlier than he let on. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/03/us/politics/03kerik.html
|
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
41. "the most DISLIKED woman in the USA"??? |
|
Is that your opinion or do you have data to back that up?
|
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
46. Self delete. Mis-placed post. |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 01:20 PM by CyberPieHole
|
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
57. No, B*sh-lovers slamming Kerry's military record was ABSURD. (and how did THAT work out for them?) |
|
What they'll do to Candidate Hillary is "PREDICTABLE".
Predictable.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
bonito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:12 AM
Response to Original message |
15. The PNAC neocons. n/t |
denem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
24. Well I value your contributions - You're a first read for me.. |
|
The only negative is I still can't see a photo of Bobby without that pang of loss.
|
Perry Logan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 05:26 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Landslide for Clinton, you silly-billys. |
OKNancy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
All the Gore states plus Virginia, Missouri, Arkansas, Colorado and perhaps Arizona and New Hampshire. ( Florida too)
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
29. Depends upon the counter(s) of the votes. |
DFW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
30. My worthless guess if I have to make one: |
|
If it's really between those two, HRC wins handily in electoral votes, but squeaks by in popular.
What happens to the country afterwards? I think this depends on something I haven't seen discussed much at all on DU: the makeup of the Congress the next president will be working with. I suspect that if the Democrats win a greater-than-expected majority in the House and Senate, that things won't be so bad at all, even with HRC as president. I suspect that Pelosi will have an unexpected fight on her hands to remain speaker, and that even if she wins, she throws in the towel after 2 years max. She is (or was) progressive enough, but will get blown away by someone with the same views, but less cautious about going forward with them. I also think that if the Senate gives a comfortable majority, say 56 seats or better, that Reid is out as majority leader, and someone like Chris Dodd will take over. Leahy stays on as Judiciary chairman, and I think Conyers has a few years left in him as well. I think Stevens will retire from the Supreme COurt, and a Steve Breyer type will replace him. I also think that Kennedy and/or (dare I wish it?) Scalia will retire as well, and turn history back, or rather forward, to where it should have been in the legal history of our country.
If we don't get some really comfortable majorities in both houses of Congress, we get a wishy-washy, unattractive version of what we wanted, and we will be bitching about the results of the election until the next one.
|
PaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
32. Don't think it's really close......... |
|
Rudy would win rather handily in my opinion. Hillary is poison in a general election. Poison.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
33. Then Why Is She Spanking Him In The Majority Of Published Polls? |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. And She's Beating Rudi's Ass By Thirteen Points In Your Home State |
PaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
52. don't care about the polls......... |
|
I'm telling you what I think will happen. I'll gladly come here for some crow if I'm wrong. Frankly I'm hoping neither get nominated.
|
PaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
36. I must admit I'm really surprised.......... |
|
that we're paying attention to "polls" around here. I was a Howard Dean supporter back in 2003 and the polls broke against him late. I'm convinced the same will happen with HRC after their base unifies and the Evangelical movement comes out in force against her. Their base hates her more than ours hates Bush. They'll rally around anyone to defeat HRC. Religious conservatives who might otherwise stay at home (Rudy?) will be out in force if HRC is the nominee. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and I certainly could be wrong about this, but from my perspective this is just so obvious. People hate this woman. I know half a dozen Democrats that will vote for Rudy over HRC. I don't know any Dems who will vote for Rudy or any other Repub over any other Dem candidate. HRC has been absolutely destroyed by a very real "right wing conspiracy". Fifteen years of being dragged through the mud. I have nothing against her, and I think she'd make a solid president. It's too bad she can't be just another relatively unknown senator.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
35. Clinton wins and we start on the longer, scenic route back to sanity |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |
37. I can only pray that the voters never choose Giuliani. |
|
that would be DISASTROUS.
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
38. WHY WAS MY POST DELETED??? |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 01:28 PM by incapsulated
PEOPLE CAN CALL HILLARY EVERY NAME IN THE BOOK BUT I CAN'T INSULT RUDY FUCKING GIULLIANI??
FUCK DU, I AM SICK OF IT.
OH, AND RUDY ***IS*** A NASTY TEMPERED LITTLE TWAT.
Edited for fully correct offensive line.
|
conservdem
(880 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
40. I though it was missing for a while. Glad to see it back? |
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
|
If I can't insult a repuke like Rudy, I am really done.
And if this is some PC nonsense, I'm also done. I have seen more sexist language used toward Hillary, than I ever imagined would be possible on DU.
|
conservdem
(880 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
43. How did you get it back? |
|
And are you saying it was deleted because of something insulting you wrote about Rudy?
If so can you please give me a general idea of what line you crossed so I can avoid it too.
|
radiclib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
47. Is "TWAT" the best you can do? |
|
I mean, c'mon. How about "nasty little cunt"? Can I call Hillary a "prick"? I would expect..actually, I HOPE this post is deleted.
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 01:28 PM by incapsulated
A "nasty tempered little twat" is hardly sexist.
In fact, if you spent any time in the UK, using "female" insults toward men is hardly unusual.
If you don't like rough language, fine.
But I use it often and I've never gotten a post deleted for that before.
Frankly, given the borderline sexist slurs I've read about a FEMALE DEMOCRAT used right here on DU I find it amusing that the line is drawn over a repuke scum like Rudy Giuliani.
|
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
53. Oh, right. We forgot for a moment that men have earned every foul word that you can dream up. n/t |
conservdem
(880 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Giuliani will win and immigration and divers licenses will play a |
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
55. "Divers"? You think everyone will want to get PADI certified? |
Basileus Basileon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
44. Clinton. We have eight pretty good years, like from '92-'00. |
ginchinchili
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Frankly, I don't think it's a chance we can afford to take. |
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
48. Clinton would win. Handily. |
|
Ghouliani will be dragged down by his "progressive" stance on GLBT issues and his record on "right to life"...you can hear all the repug crazies weepily pose the question: " ...but, but, what about the children?"
|
Carrieyazel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
56. Ghouliani wins it. Hillary won't be able to get many Indeps and ModRepukes |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 12:01 AM by Carrieyazel
Ghouliani would take nearly all of them. Ghouls will find that he's running against the only candidate more disliked than he is. They want her desperately. They know they will beat her. And this country will be on the verge of destruction if Ghouliani takes office.
|
DFW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 05:46 AM
Response to Original message |
58. The radical right will have convulsions if this is the choice |
|
Giuliani will be too far to the left for many of them, just as Hillary is too far to the right for many of us. Once the nominations are sewn up, both will try to recoup their party's bases, and I think Hillary will have an easier time of that than Giuliani would. Pics of Rudy with a bull horn don't match Hillary's voting record in the Senate, Iraq notwithstanding.
Plus there is the minor matter of the country being ready for a change, and as each day of Cheneybush goes on, the more ready it is. It'll take a LOT of Diebold machines to overcome that--more than they have, I think.
I give Hillary the Democratic nominee better chances than Hillary the candidate for the nomination. She'll have to work hard for both, and I don't think her campaign is peppered with idiots too stupid to realize that. I don't know anyone there except Ann Lewis, but if the rest of them are one tenth as sharp as Ann, they know full well what they are up against.
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
60. the ghouL in a squeaker/steaL |
|
however, we Lost controL of the senate, and maybe even the house.
hopefuLLy, peopLe wake up to that.
|
ozone_man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
61. Corporate America in a landslide. |
|
Be careful what we win. :)
|
enough already
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
62. Very clear cut. Giuliani wins |
|
Name the red state that she flips. I'll wait. Forever.
In the meantime, several current blue states are suddenly at least in play. She can't beat him nationally, period.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #62 |
66. "Name the red state that she flips. I'll wait. Forever." |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
68. "What blue states does she "put in play"? |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
Kitsune
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
63. Whoever wins, we lose. |
|
And I'll apologize right now for reminding people that the Aliens vs Predator movie ever happened.
|
Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
65. Well. That was sure fun to think about, wasn't it? |
riqster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Everybody knows all the dirt on her, and she still polls well. Most peeps don't know diddley about Rudy, and when the dirt comes out on him, he'll flame out like the Hindenberg.
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
69. Corporate America wins.....again |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message |