Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Semi Finals Bracket 1: Gravel vs. Kuncinich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:51 PM
Original message
Poll question: Semi Finals Bracket 1: Gravel vs. Kuncinich
Winner will face off in the finals at 8 am Eastern Time against bracket 2 winner of Edwards vs. Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is this?
Could you explain in more detail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Tournament Polling
Gravel beat Clinton and Dennis beat Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Oh, really
Gravel beats Clinton?

Only on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like Gravel, but not nearly as much as I like Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I had to be honest
I voted for Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mr. Flat Tax? No thanks. Dennis all the way.
Though I do like Gravel's call to legalize the ganj.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmm... It will be interesting to see who wins between Kucinich and Edwards...
... which I suspect it will wind up to be.

I pick Edwards currently because I consider him to be more "electable" to win the nomination. But if it were to be down to those two, I'd have to nitpick a lot on who I liked better as they are my top two of the announced candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. DK!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please rec to get this to the Greatest Page
Where more members will see it and better voter turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think either would make very good presidents
though I agree with them on many issues. Kucinich more than Gravel though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gravel. I'm pro legalizing pot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Kucinich is pro decriminalization of pot. I don't think the Feds should legalize, that should be
up to the states, but for them to do it, it needs to be decriminalized at the Federal level first.

I don't see a mechanism for the Feds to legalize it. Much like alchohol, they can end prohibition, but the states would do any legalization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I seem to use the two words interchangeably. Thanks for clearing it up for me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. legalization supposes a legalized and presumably taxed and regulated scheme
for distribution.

But I doubt the Feds would want to set that up for states or counties that wanted to be "smoke Free" (as in dry counties) so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. The President can legalize for medicinal use.
He can order the Attorney General to remove marijuana from the Schedule I class of substances, which means that it has an "acceptable medical use" and physicians can prescribe it.

It would also, in effect, decriminalize weed, because most of the harsh sentencing laws are due to the scheduling of herb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. If the Feds remove prohibition, then states can decide to
tax and regulate, keep illegal, or do whatever they want to do. Both with medical as well as recreational use of pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldenuff Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Keep it illegal............
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 08:47 AM by Oldenuff
How the heck are the smugglers and big time dealers supposed to make a living?

well...maybe as long as we don't go doing anything stupid like legalizing all drugs....What the heck would a real criminal have to do then...become a Politician?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Well, since they say Hill is leading, I don't think there is anything for the establishment
to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bracket 2 link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Doesn't the #1 seed face the #8 seed?
I'm not liking the match ups so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The #1 seed already lost to the #8 seed
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 09:59 PM by itsrobert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. Thus cementing the fact that DU may not be used as a weathervane for anything ever
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gravel.
Dennis Kucinich said he saw a UFO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. Gravel coulda said he'd PILOTED a UFO and you'd still bash Dennis.
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 01:20 AM by Ken Burch
Basically, you have it in for the progressive wing of the party. Why, we aren't really to blame for much of any of the party's problems, is a bonafide mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does "Gravel" not have a first name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I think this is actually DK versus gravel
the road construction material.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. That's not necessarily true, be fair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. !
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelSansCause Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. this is just going to be an edwards v kucinich battle
didnt you see the poll that had over 1000 votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Poll ends at 8 AM Monday, Edwards fans
better get busy. (note: I'm one of them)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. As an Alaskan and a student of Alaska politics, I could NEVER back Gravel
Some things you need to know:

1)In the mid-1960's, Mike Gravel singlehandedly destroyed a possible Democratic organization in the state legislature by breaking his verbal commitment(which was anathema in Alaska politics at the time),

2)In 1968, Mike Gravel challenged, with Republican and corporate support, one of the great heroes of Alaska politics, Senator Ernest Gruening. Gruening, who was a long-time territorial governor and statehood advocate, was one of only TWO members of the U.S. Senate, along with Wayne Morse from my home state of Oregon, to vote against the Gulf of Tonkin resolution in 1964, the resolution that Lyndon Johnson used to justify his escalation of the Vietnam War. Gravel was LBJ's instrument of revenge in the 1968 Alaska Democratic primary, beating Gruening with heavy support from Republican crossover votes(the primary was open back then). This makes Gravel's later presentation of himself as an antiwar hero hollow, to say the least.

3)In the late 1970's, as a second term senator, Gravel sabotauged the ORIGINAL Alaska Lands Act that was carefully negotiated between President Carter and our senior senator, Ted Stevens(or "Senator for life or until 2008, whichever comes first" as we NOW call him.) In response to Gravel's treachery, Carter introduced a much more sweeping lands act passed over Stevens' opposition that the Republicans later used to wipe Alaska Democrats off the political map in this state(we are just NOW recovering from this, and only slowly).

Mike Gravel is a man no one should trust with their primary vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. This is very interesting info. Anything else we should know?
Not like I was going to trust Gravel with my vote anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. I like Gravel's moxie, but I can't stand his flat tax. It's a regressive idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. I didn' t really WANT to mention this but...
At one point, while he was senator, Gravel proposed to put a large area of the state (I believe it was most of the Anchorage area) under a DOME.

As in, like a really, really, really, really, really, really large Astrodome. But without sports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. Gravel may be getting senile
But Kuncinich is just plain Crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
33. Poll is closed.
It's Dennis Kucinich in a landslide victory. Next up the finals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC