itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:51 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Semi Finals Bracket 1: Gravel vs. Kuncinich |
|
Winner will face off in the finals at 8 am Eastern Time against bracket 2 winner of Edwards vs. Biden.
|
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Could you explain in more detail?
|
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Gravel beat Clinton and Dennis beat Obama.
|
question everything
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Gravel beats Clinton?
Only on DU.
|
DutchLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I like Gravel, but not nearly as much as I like Dennis! |
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Mr. Flat Tax? No thanks. Dennis all the way. |
|
Though I do like Gravel's call to legalize the ganj.
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Hmm... It will be interesting to see who wins between Kucinich and Edwards... |
|
... which I suspect it will wind up to be.
I pick Edwards currently because I consider him to be more "electable" to win the nomination. But if it were to be down to those two, I'd have to nitpick a lot on who I liked better as they are my top two of the announced candidates.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Please rec to get this to the Greatest Page |
|
Where more members will see it and better voter turnout.
|
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I don't think either would make very good presidents |
|
though I agree with them on many issues. Kucinich more than Gravel though.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Gravel. I'm pro legalizing pot. nt |
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Kucinich is pro decriminalization of pot. I don't think the Feds should legalize, that should be |
|
up to the states, but for them to do it, it needs to be decriminalized at the Federal level first.
I don't see a mechanism for the Feds to legalize it. Much like alchohol, they can end prohibition, but the states would do any legalization.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. I seem to use the two words interchangeably. Thanks for clearing it up for me. nt |
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
27. legalization supposes a legalized and presumably taxed and regulated scheme |
|
for distribution.
But I doubt the Feds would want to set that up for states or counties that wanted to be "smoke Free" (as in dry counties) so to speak.
|
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
24. The President can legalize for medicinal use. |
|
He can order the Attorney General to remove marijuana from the Schedule I class of substances, which means that it has an "acceptable medical use" and physicians can prescribe it.
It would also, in effect, decriminalize weed, because most of the harsh sentencing laws are due to the scheduling of herb.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. If the Feds remove prohibition, then states can decide to |
|
tax and regulate, keep illegal, or do whatever they want to do. Both with medical as well as recreational use of pot.
|
Oldenuff
(442 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
34. Keep it illegal............ |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 08:47 AM by Oldenuff
How the heck are the smugglers and big time dealers supposed to make a living?
well...maybe as long as we don't go doing anything stupid like legalizing all drugs....What the heck would a real criminal have to do then...become a Politician?
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
35. Well, since they say Hill is leading, I don't think there is anything for the establishment |
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Doesn't the #1 seed face the #8 seed? |
|
I'm not liking the match ups so far.
|
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. The #1 seed already lost to the #8 seed |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 09:59 PM by itsrobert
|
Basileus Basileon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
30. Thus cementing the fact that DU may not be used as a weathervane for anything ever |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dennis Kucinich said he saw a UFO.
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
32. Gravel coulda said he'd PILOTED a UFO and you'd still bash Dennis. |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 01:20 AM by Ken Burch
Basically, you have it in for the progressive wing of the party. Why, we aren't really to blame for much of any of the party's problems, is a bonafide mystery.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Does "Gravel" not have a first name? |
JeffR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. I think this is actually DK versus gravel |
|
the road construction material.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. That's not necessarily true, be fair |
JeffR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
RebelSansCause
(304 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message |
17. this is just going to be an edwards v kucinich battle |
|
didnt you see the poll that had over 1000 votes?
|
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. Poll ends at 8 AM Monday, Edwards fans |
|
better get busy. (note: I'm one of them)
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
18. As an Alaskan and a student of Alaska politics, I could NEVER back Gravel |
|
Some things you need to know:
1)In the mid-1960's, Mike Gravel singlehandedly destroyed a possible Democratic organization in the state legislature by breaking his verbal commitment(which was anathema in Alaska politics at the time),
2)In 1968, Mike Gravel challenged, with Republican and corporate support, one of the great heroes of Alaska politics, Senator Ernest Gruening. Gruening, who was a long-time territorial governor and statehood advocate, was one of only TWO members of the U.S. Senate, along with Wayne Morse from my home state of Oregon, to vote against the Gulf of Tonkin resolution in 1964, the resolution that Lyndon Johnson used to justify his escalation of the Vietnam War. Gravel was LBJ's instrument of revenge in the 1968 Alaska Democratic primary, beating Gruening with heavy support from Republican crossover votes(the primary was open back then). This makes Gravel's later presentation of himself as an antiwar hero hollow, to say the least.
3)In the late 1970's, as a second term senator, Gravel sabotauged the ORIGINAL Alaska Lands Act that was carefully negotiated between President Carter and our senior senator, Ted Stevens(or "Senator for life or until 2008, whichever comes first" as we NOW call him.) In response to Gravel's treachery, Carter introduced a much more sweeping lands act passed over Stevens' opposition that the Republicans later used to wipe Alaska Democrats off the political map in this state(we are just NOW recovering from this, and only slowly).
Mike Gravel is a man no one should trust with their primary vote.
|
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
25. This is very interesting info. Anything else we should know? |
|
Not like I was going to trust Gravel with my vote anyway.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. I like Gravel's moxie, but I can't stand his flat tax. It's a regressive idea. |
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
31. I didn' t really WANT to mention this but... |
|
At one point, while he was senator, Gravel proposed to put a large area of the state (I believe it was most of the Anchorage area) under a DOME.
As in, like a really, really, really, really, really, really large Astrodome. But without sports.
|
Froward69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
26. Gravel may be getting senile |
|
But Kuncinich is just plain Crazy.
|
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-05-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It's Dennis Kucinich in a landslide victory. Next up the finals.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |