Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone who thinks "Plant-a-Gate" is going to have an affect on Hillary's campaign is grasping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:26 PM
Original message
Anyone who thinks "Plant-a-Gate" is going to have an affect on Hillary's campaign is grasping
at straws.

It's pretty hilarious watching Fox News and half of this place trying to make such a mountain out of a tiny little molehill. Voters care more about the Goddess of Peace ending the war when and if she takes office (unless Obama or Kucinich overtakes her, that is) than they do about one of her staffers fucking up at some town hall meeting. Good gawd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just checked in....what is "plant a gate"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It's DU's name for the thing where 1 of her staff planted a question in the crowd
for her to answer and got caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Thanks.
Something the anti-Clintonites here cooked up. Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. oh, I thought she had warts on her feet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. She does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I thought I was funny
but you just brought tears to my eyes! I must be tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I have that effect on people.
Usually not in a good way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. her support for NY governor on driver license issue
is much more likely to harm her. Pity it was a reasonable response to the question which SHOULDN'T be answered simply as Right/Wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. True. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know--ridiculous--if this is worst thing they can come up with
they should throw in the towel.

GWB screnes his audiences so that nothing but certain questions
are asked from a friendly audience....we Americans have taken
this in stride.

Grasping at straws is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Faking the grassroots democratic process is a "tiny molehill?"
Okay, suit yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Did Hillary herself do it or was it a staffer? Big difference. Wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Her staffer must know she has problems answering questions and was just trying to help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, everyone should have her problems like double digit leads in the polls. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. How did Hillary just happen to call on the plant?
Why do it if you don't tell the candidate whom to call on? It strains credulity to suggest that she didn't know exactly what was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Exactly. Either way, it's outright deception.
Say she just called on a questioner that one of her staffers pointed out to her, but she didn't know the person had been given a question. If this is true, she's still making it seem like she's calling on a random questioner rather than someone who's been filtered by the campaign. Even in this case, she's deceiving people by having them think that she's standing up to whatever might come by: she's pretending to be brave to take what may come and she's pretending to be open to and approachable by the people. At the bare minimum, it's pretty extreme stagey deception.

Knowingly using a claque is filth politics of the Rovian variety and anyone who doesn't get that has big moral problems.

Beyond all that, it's just hard to believe she didn't know the whole thing; she's a traditional machine politician cut from whole cloth, and that cloth is Tweed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petersjo02 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll be attending my Iowa caucus
I started out this primary season with no clear front runner in mind. Every time some new thing like this planting business appears about Clinton, she drops another notch in my evaluation process. Busing in out-of-staters for tonight's JJ dinner dropped her another notch. I can also cite her connections with Rupert Murdoch as well as her recent vote on the Lieberman-Kyl invitation to bomb Iran as reasons I've begun to distrust her. She never has admitted she was suckered by Bush on the Iraq resolution. If I knew Iraq had no WMDs at that time, how is it that she, with all her resources, didn't? I question whether she was suckered at all but chose instead to support what seemed to be the popular view at the time that some country had to suffer for 9-11, even if that country didn't have a damn thing to do with it. If she is the nominee, I'll have to vote for her, but she has lost considerable credibility with me, just as other candidates are gaining credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You cite some excellent examples of Sen Clinton's issues.
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 11:49 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
And they are troublesome, indeed.

However, THIS one is not the ditch to die in, unless one is fixated on the superficial. If this one episode where a staffer suggested a student ask a question about her current policy on global warming changed your mind, than you didn't support her to begin with.

Faux disillusionment, for trivial issues, the lazy intellect. An often unfathomable foe. MKJ

edit because I hit post instead of preview, yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Do you have a link for her bussing in out of staters and do you know
if any other candidates did the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well we have rudi the 9/11 nutso
and now Obama I didn't vote for the war. Hell no he probably sat that one out like he does all the hard votes....

Obama -- I didn't vote for the war
Obama -- I didn't vote for the war.

Tell does everybody now know that rudi is connected to 9/11 and that Obama did not vote for the war. Yeah Yeah....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. Note that the anti-Hillarties are in perfect synch with the corporate media--as always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC