Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton's new game plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:47 AM
Original message
Hillary Clinton's new game plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds more to me like Scaife's plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like "keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not even sure
what this has to do with Hillary. Scaife wanted to help with Clinton's philanthropic pursuits, which are non-partisan.

The article says Scaife isn't supporting Hillary.

Bill's not joining Scaife - Scaife's joining Bill, after years of fighting him and losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Should People, Primarily In The Third World, Die A Wretched Death From AIDS Because You Don't Like
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 09:18 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
Richard Mellon Scaife?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. yes --
--because it's so much easier to look at the world in black & white.

Keep the black hat and twirling mustache on our villains, there is zero room in the Democratic Party for sober adult judgement!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Can Scaife give to an AIDS project and not become Clinton's best buddy?
What a cop-out response! Yeah, I mean people should die.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Umm....
Yes, Scaife can give to Clinton's fund and not be his best buddy.

The article doesn't say he has become Clinton's best buddy, so I'm guessing that's exactly what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Umm...
Bill Clinton now finds himself the unlikeliest of Scaife heroes. Last month Ruddy posted a softball interview with Clinton on the Newsmax site (sample question: "What is the best thing about being an ex-president?"). A worshipful cover story followed in the current edition of the magazine. Clinton, it gushed, is "a political and cultural powerhouse" who is "part Merlin and part Midas—a politician with a magical touch."

<...>

Whatever the reasons for Scaife's change of heart, it's not hard to figure out why the Clintons would embrace a former nemesis. As they prepared for Hillary's presidential run, the Clintons made quiet attempts to disarm, or at least neutralize, some of their most vocal opponents. Last year Hillary accepted an offer from Rupert Murdoch (who always hedges his bets) to host a fund-raiser for her Senate campaign. The New York Times reported that the Clinton camp has also made efforts to open a line of communication to blogger Matt Drudge, who has served as a conduit for anti-Clinton GOP leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And that makes Clinton and Scaife "best buddies"?
The article clearly says Scaife is not supporting clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sure it does!
Sciafe rags touting Bill Clinton as "part Merlin and part Midas—a politician with a magical touch" has no impact on Hillary. Is it customary for someone to make a donation and then have surrogates (wingnuts) lauding the foundation's executives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Do you believe Scaife is "Clinton's best buddy?"
Or is that hyperbole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. why did you start two threads on this?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. He Doesn't Like Or Care About People With AIDS, Many Of Whom Are In The Third World And Broke
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 09:22 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I Hope You Are Doing Well As You Can, Bro
I'm almost at the point of tears...Back in the early nineties, which was a long time ago, my boss hired a man who was in the final stage of AIDS to do some clerical/sales work at our office...He was a shell of a man we knew...

Who cares if the money came from Scaife?

It is money to fight AIDS that wasn't there before he made the contribution...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yes, make this Newsweek article personal by attacking me.
I wish you well, but it does not change my opinion. Sciafe's type of hatred is not something I can condone. No more than I can condone this:

"The point I'm here to make to you is whoever you're for, this is a really big election. We saw what happened the last seven years when we made decisions in elections based on trivial matters. When we listened to people make snide comments about whether Vice President Gore was too stiff.

And when they made dishonest claims about the things that he said that he'd done in his life. When that scandalous Swift Boat ad was run against Senator Kerry. When there was an ad that defeated Max Cleland in Georgia, a man that left half his body in Vietnam. And a guy that led several departments ... with Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden because he dared to vote against the president's version of the Homeland Security bill. Most Americans still don't know the truth.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. no, let's make your spin of it a reason to attack you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. No, it was my opinion, but this is your best defense? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, that was your spin. And I don't need to defend money to fight AIDS regardless the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. No, you felt the need to attack me for saying that Bill Clinton is cozying up to Sciafe! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No, I feel the need to attack you for implying that money isn't clean enough for AIDS research.
Typical narrow-minded "progressive"*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Never said that. Sciafe should give all his money to AIDS research, but
what does that have to do with cozying up to him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Your implications said it for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. If Clinton did so much for AIDS during his presidency,
then why did AIDS activist praise George W. Bush over him?

That's embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Who's talking about his Presidency?
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 01:15 PM by William769
I'm talking now! Go ahead show your hatred for a man who has championed a great cause, your kind is so typical. Praise the BIGOTS (good ole Donnie Boy) and Bash someone who is making a difference. Disgusting.

ON EDIT: and about your statement, as the old saying goes, put up or shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. last time I looked Bill and Hillary were two different people
so I don't understand the basis for your "Hillary's game plan" title.

While I do understand the basis for your irrational hatred of all things Clinton, I would suggest that taking it to the low level you have here in this thread does far more harm to your credibility than it does to Hillary's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. The caption for the photograph:
A New Game Plan: The Clintons made quiet attempts to disarm their most vocal opponents


More from the article:

Bill Clinton now finds himself the unlikeliest of Scaife heroes. Last month Ruddy posted a softball interview with Clinton on the Newsmax site (sample question: "What is the best thing about being an ex-president?"). A worshipful cover story followed in the current edition of the magazine. Clinton, it gushed, is "a political and cultural powerhouse" who is "part Merlin and part Midas—a politician with a magical touch."

<...>

Whatever the reasons for Scaife's change of heart, it's not hard to figure out why the Clintons would embrace a former nemesis. As they prepared for Hillary's presidential run, the Clintons made quiet attempts to disarm, or at least neutralize, some of their most vocal opponents. Last year Hillary accepted an offer from Rupert Murdoch (who always hedges his bets) to host a fund-raiser for her Senate campaign. The New York Times reported that the Clinton camp has also made efforts to open a line of communication to blogger Matt Drudge, who has served as a conduit for anti-Clinton GOP leaks.


This:

While I do understand the basis for your irrational hatred of all things Clinton, I would suggest that taking it to the low level you have here in this thread does far more harm to your credibility than it does to Hillary's.


Signature Clinton supporter response!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. and yours is a signature Clinton hater thread
innuendo, guilt by association, and vitriol in abundance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Where? Show me the innuendo and vitriol. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hillary bashers apparently are now grasping at straws. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Basher? No, critic! What straw am I supposedly grasping at
That I find cozying up to the likes of Sciafe reprehensible?

Bill Clinton now finds himself the unlikeliest of Scaife heroes. Last month Ruddy posted a softball interview with Clinton on the Newsmax site (sample question: "What is the best thing about being an ex-president?"). A worshipful cover story followed in the current edition of the magazine. Clinton, it gushed, is "a political and cultural powerhouse" who is "part Merlin and part Midas—a politician with a magical touch."

<...>

Whatever the reasons for Scaife's change of heart, it's not hard to figure out why the Clintons would embrace a former nemesis. As they prepared for Hillary's presidential run, the Clintons made quiet attempts to disarm, or at least neutralize, some of their most vocal opponents. Last year Hillary accepted an offer from Rupert Murdoch (who always hedges his bets) to host a fund-raiser for her Senate campaign. The New York Times reported that the Clinton camp has also made efforts to open a line of communication to blogger Matt Drudge, who has served as a conduit for anti-Clinton GOP leaks.



"The point I'm here to make to you is whoever you're for, this is a really big election. We saw what happened the last seven years when we made decisions in elections based on trivial matters. When we listened to people make snide comments about whether Vice President Gore was too stiff.

And when they made dishonest claims about the things that he said that he'd done in his life. When that scandalous Swift Boat ad was run against Senator Kerry. When there was an ad that defeated Max Cleland in Georgia, a man that left half his body in Vietnam. And a guy that led several departments ... with Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden because he dared to vote against the president's version of the Homeland Security bill. Most Americans still don't know the truth.

more




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. You seem unable to understand that the Clintons have a history fo trying to work WITH
those who have a different perspective from theirs. And change minds when they can. And if they can't they try and work around them. It's not really anything new.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. So this is an attempt to change
Scaife?

OK! When Bill Clinton says people still don't know the truth, it's most likely because they spend more time sending mix messages.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Nope. It's taking help on something important, from sources that you might disagree with
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 03:44 PM by wlucinda
It would appear that Scaife has had a change of perspective, but who really knows what his motivation is.

Where you see mixed messages I see working within a system, with wildly differing opinions, in an effort to effect change. With the attendant wins and losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Sciafe hasn't changed. He gives money for cover. He continues to support
the most vile wing of the Republican party. Spreading lies and distortions in an attempt to ruin people is not working within the system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I'll still take his money for something that important.
I was referencing his sudden praise for Clinton as a changed POV. Which is still suspect, as far as I'm concerned. But I'll happily spend his money to help others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Yup.
That would seem to be the case around here lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
32. I am not CLinton fan, but I don't see the problem.
If freaking Bush wanted to give a money to my charity, I wouldn't hurt my cause by ripping up the check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC