Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: A Health Plan for Wal-Mart: Less Stinginess

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:21 PM
Original message
NYT: A Health Plan for Wal-Mart: Less Stinginess

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/business/13walmart.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin

By MICHAEL BARBARO and REED ABELSON
Published: November 13, 2007

For much of the last decade, the retailing behemoth Wal-Mart Stores has been associated with stingy health care as much as low prices.


Brandi Simons for The New York Times

After declining Wal-Mart’s health coverage last year, and then avoiding doctor visits, Katrina Wagner chose a plan this year.


Across the country, politicians and labor groups derided the company’s health plans for their high expense and bare-bones coverage. Two states, California and Maryland, even passed laws demanding, in effect, that the company spend more on employee health benefits.

“We want this giant to behave itself,” one Maryland legislator, Anne Healey, said at the time.

The giant, it turns out, was listening. All the criticism was hurting its reputation and its ability to expand. So now, after spending two years seeking advice from everyone from Bill Clinton to executives at Starbucks, Wal-Mart is overhauling its health plans.

The company, according to data available for the first time, is offering better coverage to a greater number of workers. Wal-Mart, the nation’s largest private employer, provides insurance to 100,000 more workers than it did just three years ago — and it is now easier for many to sign up for health care at Wal-Mart than at its rival, Target, whose reputation glows in comparison.

Wal-Mart has hardly become a standard-bearer for corporate America: it still insures fewer than half its 1.4 million employees in the United States.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. so it's ad says that wal-mart now insures 150,000 . . .
out of 1.4 million? gee, that's big of them. my take is that they only offer insurance to full time employees and i understand that the vast majority of their employees are part time. sorry, i cannot get excited about this news. when they sign up half of their employees, then i'll get excited.

i would say what i think of the waltons but i might get banned from this board.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC