Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Win, Lose or Draw, Edwards Will Have The Most Influence On This Primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:14 PM
Original message
Win, Lose or Draw, Edwards Will Have The Most Influence On This Primary
He's the one person in position to determine the ultimate outcome of this race.

He, more than anyone else, needs to win Iowa to be president.

If he doesn't win Iowa, his chances are doomed. He won't have enough money to go much further if he doesn't place first, or a close, impressive second.

Providing he doesn't do that, then he could arguable be in a better ultimate position for himself than either Clinton or Obama to secure a spot in the White House come '09.

The thinking is this...

Edwards fails to win Iowa, comes in third behind Clinton and Obama, get something like 18% of the vote there.

That 18% will be much greater than the distance between Clinton and Obama.

It's at this point Edwards has a choice to make.

He can continue to run, gambling on some miracle to take place in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

Or he can cut a deal.

And there's two possible deals he could make, depending on who he cuts them with.

If he wants to deal with Clinton, he could say to her "look, if you make me your vice president, I'll drop out, endorse you, and have my supporters go towards you before South Carolina, which will be a more vulnerable state for you than New Hampshire when going up against Obama."

Or, and this is the more likely scenario -- if he wanted to deal with Obama, he could say to him "hey, I hate Hillary as much as you do. This is what I'll do for you, I'll drop out, throw my support behind you, and you can have my 18% (or whatever the figure is) and use it against her. In return, I want to be Attorney General.

Either way, he'd tip the balance in one favor or the other.

Now, why would he ask for a VP slot with one candidate and an AG slot with another? Because there's no way he'd be Obama's VP. Neither one has foreign policy experience, and Edwards doesn't balance Obama well.

Plus, it would be a move Clinton would only make if she were truly threatened by Obama, if he runs one or two points behind her in both Iowa or New Hampshire - or wins one or both. She'd see his momentum building and would need a desperation move at that point. He'd have more leverage against her than he would Obama, so he could ask for more than just an AG spot.

And between Clinton and Obama, it's more likely Hillary would pull off a move like that if it were close, because this is her one and only opportunity to be president. If she can't get through the primary this time, it's not likely voters will think much differently of her four or eight years from now.

But Obama can be patient. He's got time on his side. He's more likely to turn up in 2012 or 2016 then she is. The sense of desperation won't envelope him like it will the Clinton team.

So even if he doesn't win the nomination, Edwards can still have the most influence on this election year by being king-maker (or queen-maker).

My money is on king-maker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. That sort of presumes that Iowans are sheeple.
It may happen along the lines you have laid out, but I certainly wouldn't vote for someone just because my candidate dropped out and supported someone else.

You couldn't pay me to vote for one of the candidates currently running in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. well, that's not the point
the point is the candidate who's dropping out, in this case Edwards, would turn over the information they have on their supporters so then the other candidate could start contacting Edwards supporters for money, support, votes, ect.

It's not automatic, but if Edwards endorsement can get 60% of his supporters toward one candidate or the other, than that could have influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No I agree with your premise as far as the "possiblities" go, I just
don't see them, as a bloc, giving up their own second choices. If my number once choice tanked or withdrew for some reason, I'd move on to my own number two selection, not someone else's recommendation.

Although my view may not be the "norm"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Edwards supporters are not going for HIllary. Hopefully Edwards wouldn't do it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I simply cant imagine Edwards aligning with Clinton...
Edited on Mon Nov-19-07 06:53 PM by bunnies
under any circumstance.

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. One thing, in South Carolina
Edwards doesn't seem to have much juice there. Clinton is leading Edwards among whites 40-17 and Obama among blacks. So it wouldn't be a promise that means much should Edwards drop out before SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't believe all you hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know his campaign doesn't accept it
But current projections are what they are until they change.

White S.C. Democrats pick Clinton instead of Edwards


According to the most recent Winthrop/ETV poll, 40 percent of white Democrats in South Carolina who say they are likely to cast a ballot in January’s primary are supporting U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York.

A distant second is former U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina with 17 percent support. U.S. Sen. Barack Obama from Illinois is in third with 11 percent among white Democrats.

-snip

Others attribute Clinton’s S.C. lead among white votes to Edwards’ loss of those voters - a claim Edwards’ campaign denies.

“I find it hard to believe that voters in South Carolina give more of their dollars to John Edwards than any other Democrat, see him campaigning here more than any other Democrat, hear him talk about his life here and the need to reverse decades of poor trade deals that have hurt their state, and then decide to support the senator from New York,” said Teresa Wells, Edward’s spokeswoman. “That is just not happening.”



http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/politics/story/255090.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Edwards can never again be the Democratic VP nominee
Edited on Mon Nov-19-07 07:23 PM by tritsofme
The media would laugh him off the ticket as our perennial VP candidate.

Not too mention running as VP means you have to take the position of your #1 guy, and in this case he could end up on the trail saying things in sharp contrast to what he said as Kerry's VP, the RW would basically have a field day with it.

Attorney General for Edwards? I don't really want an out and out partisan in that position, let alone giving the position away solely for political brinkmanship.

As far as Edwards' political future goes, I think its Iowa or bust, run the table or go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reno.Muse Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. The man has a conscience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. The best deal to be cut ...
... would be for Edwards to offer Al Gore the VP slot, with free reign to manage the global Environmental crisis with the FULL backing of Edward's administration. That my friends, would change everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. and it would never happen
why on earth would Gore take it? He spent 8 years as vp. there' no indication whatsoever that he wants to spend another 4 to 8 in that position. He had an excellent shot at the presidency and you think he turned away from that just to accept a vp slot? Not to mention that he's already made a committment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. Bill Clinton only had half his numbers at this time during his campaign..
This post is about hoping Edwards withdraws. I see Edwards as the 'alternative candidate' to the corporation candidates. He is our last hope of avoiding another four years of this type non-representative government. DK is the only other real 'change' candidate, but hasn't made much impact yet. So, let's allow the primaries to get going before we count our chickens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. i think the better deal
would be for Biden and Edwards to start campaigning together. I don't care which one heads the ticket, although I lean toward Biden.

They are both serious, issues-oriented candidates who clearly want to fix things, both internationally and domestically. That tandem would eclipse all the rest. Distrust of Hillary and skepticism of Obama's readiness would immediatly boil over as people just said "well, yeah, that's the ticket!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistInBabylon Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Good ticket
I think that would effectively be a great ticket, although I can't see Edwards either accepting or being offered vice (and that has nothing to do with me supporting Biden). It would be a crowd-pleaser though. I could also see Obama becoming more legit. (in terms of experience) by being Biden's vice and positioning himself extremely well for the future. Personally I'd love to see Edwards as Att. General, and I mean that in the best possible way; I think he would really shine at justice and if he's not president, the future democratic president should consider that position for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Whoever wins Iowa, will win the nomination
You heard it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. actually, no
we've heard it a thousand times

but you have a 50-50 chance of being right, so what the hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC