Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama ... political expediency or the Politics of Change?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:15 PM
Original message
Obama ... political expediency or the Politics of Change?
does this sound like the Politics of Hope and Change to you? Or is it just a surprising example of him having done something in the past that he now attacks other candidates about. Certainly doesn't sound courageous.

courtesy of DU Member BeyondGeography:

"Anyway, the "present" strategy was designed to frustrate Republicans, a goal I'm sure you support. Here's what the head of Illinois Planned Parenthood had to say about it from the same article:

==..."The Republicans were in control of the Illinois Senate at the time. They loved to hold votes on 'partial birth' and 'born alive'. They put these bills out all the time . . . because they wanted to pigeonhole Democrats."

Speaking to ABC News as Obama was preparing to join Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and the wife of Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., in addressing Planned Parenthood’s national conference in Washington, D.C., Sutherland said Obama approached her in the late 1990s and worked with her and others in crafting the strategy of voting "present." She remembers meeting with Obama outside of the Illinois Senate chambers on the Democratic side of the aisle. She and Obama finished their conversation in his office.

"He came to me and said: 'My members are being attacked. We need to figure out a way to protect members and to protect women,'" said Sutherland in recounting her conversation with Obama. "A 'present' vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly what Obama wanted."

"What it did," she continued, "was give cover to moderate Democrats who wanted to vote with us but were afraid to do so" because of how their votes would be used against them electorally. "A 'present' vote would protect them. Your senator voted 'present.' Most of the electorate is not going to know what that means."==

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/obama-a...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Politically chicken shit if you ask me
He has a problem with decisions and likes to cover his ass.

Thanks for the good info. Recomended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. don't thank me
thank BeyondGeography, a wonderfully, unapologetically energetic 'bama supporter. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would say Bama Droid
or as my friends say, BamaBot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. a friend of mine
calls them the 'bamaBrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. My My. Aren't you the same folks that dislike the term Hillbot? And NO I have never referred to you
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 12:59 PM by saracat
or anyone else by that term. It is disrespectful. But it seems there was all this outrage directed at those that call the supporters of the former front runner that derogatory term and here some are using similar terms for another candidates supporters! Hmm.Not nice.On either side.Just saying.And not so long ago some were saying how the HRC supporters "turned the other cheek".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. The former...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. blog link didn't work for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilovesunshine Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Nor me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gene430 Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Has to get aggressive
Edited on Mon Dec-03-07 08:48 PM by gene430
Obama has to be willing to get in the mud and sling. What Hillary is putting on him is nothing compared to what he would see in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It ain't spit compared to shit he'll face
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. blog link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama's behavior is as expected: hypocritical.
I cannot trust the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'd say both
and if you can have just the latter it must be another country than the one I am seeing through the fraud-media filter.

In defense of the latter I think he does mean it and that is where he is coming from fundamentally. Someone thinking he is 95% a coldly ambitious man who primarily wants to be the Main Guy would have a much easier time proving it were it true. Those who think he is 100% the candidate of change had better switch to DK or anger and heartbreak and delusion fill the personal horizon. I personally think Edwards is much more the candidate of actual change, but that Obama is the "fresh face" new generation thing with the usual blank spaces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. no one is more "politically expedient "than Ms.Hillary.It is life's breath to her.
It may well be that Obama is playing politics but it surely is not a good thing for the Clinton Camp, the employers of such as Mark Penn and the framers of such expediency as the Kyl/Lieberman vote to attack any other candidate on "expediency".That is a bit "over the top".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. You're attacking Obama for standing up for womens rights?
Because that's what this is all about. The Democrats couldn't kill those anti-choice bills on their own. They were trying to get republican help. They were doing what they could to stifle the anti-choice vote in the Senate. This may be a bad thing to some. I say good for Obama for standing up for choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC