Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you were a senator, and couldn't make an important vote, would you release a statement...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:47 PM
Original message
Poll question: If you were a senator, and couldn't make an important vote, would you release a statement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fun fact: How long did Obama wait to release a statement after Kyl-Lieberman?
7 Hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Fun fact: Hillary voted for IWR and Kyl-Lieberman. She never learns, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Fun fact: Edwards co-sponsored the IWR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Fun fact: He learned his lesson, and doesn't claim he'll end the war--yet continue combat missions.
And he sure as hell didn't support Kyl-Lieberman.

Nor did Senator Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Fun Fact: Just like Senator Obama, Senator Edwards
Edited on Wed Dec-05-07 02:01 PM by Occam Bandage
Edwards has never actually voted against war, nor has he ever voted opposite Hillary Clinton on matters of war. I'm not impressed by armchair quarterbacking.

Edit: Second Fun Fact: He opposed K-L because "As president, Edwards will ensure that such steps are not just more rhetoric, but actually lead to results." Just like Obama, his opposition is not because he disagrees with designating the IRG a terrorist organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. How did he vote on Kyle-Lieberman? Did he learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Edwards was not a member of the senate during the Kyl-Lieberman vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks. I thought he was a senator for a while. What am I missing?
Beyond memory I mean. Not wanting to get into snarking here, looking for info. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Edwards was a senator from 1998-2004
During his short time in the senate, he was very pro-business, opposed universal health care, and was one of the most vocal dems in support of the invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. He quit to be VP, that's right.
Sorry, brain fart. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Gee does Obama have an excuse for sitting the votes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary voted YES on Kyl-Lieberman.
That's the issue here. Nonvotes don't start wars. Yes votes do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The president can't vote "present"
And he can't ignore controversial legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. President Obama will do a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undercoverduer Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You are right but when Hillary chose to vote she voted yes. . .
. . .and presidents don't vote on legislation. VP's do and they can vote present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I never said Presidents vote on legislation
BHO doesn't seem to vote on legislation either. I geuss that makes him presidential, in a way. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undercoverduer Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I see we have another Clinton supporter pushing the BHO line now. . .
Edited on Wed Dec-05-07 01:55 PM by undercoverduer
. . .we knew that wouldn't take long for you to follow the Clinton strategies of using right wing tactics. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I would call him BO if it made you feel better
Edited on Wed Dec-05-07 01:57 PM by Lirwin2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hillary and Barack are also guilty of waiting until the last moment to vote,
when their votes would make no difference anyway. I've seen that happen.

Hillary should not be proud of her voting record when it comes to giving Bush more and more power. After the travesty that is Iraq, you'd think she'd know better. I wonder what the real motivation for her votes is?

Who does she owe? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Can you explain this?
The Politico's Ben Smith reported November 5, 2007, that a key passage on Edwards' website regarding Iran has been changed.<1>

"As of September 7, the passage read:<2>

"'Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will soon be deemed a terrorist organization by the U.S. As president, Edwards will ensure that such steps are not just more rhetoric, but actually lead to results.'

"The passage now reads:<3>

"'Congress recently passed a bill to declare Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. We saw in Iraq where such steps by Congress can lead President Bush. Edwards has announced his opposition to this bill.'

"The rest of the text of the 2,000-word foreign policy page is unchanged. And while this is obviously an update to keep pace with the news, the first version lacks any condemnation of the planned terrorist designation," Smith wrote.<1>
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_Edwards

I have heard Edwards call for the use of carrots and sticks as a negotiating strategy toward Iran. Clinton called the designation of Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a "stick" for a diplomatic strategy. What sticks does Edwards support?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I don't see the first paragraph as support.
"'Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will soon be deemed a terrorist organization by the U.S. As president, Edwards will ensure that such steps are not just more rhetoric, but actually lead to results.'


The way I read it, it says that this is just another bullshit step on the part of Bushco, which amounts to more sabre rattling, instead of taking real actions that will produce results, which is what Edwards would do as President.

I don't read into it that he first supported it, then changed his mind, so I don't see the controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. She owes Yale?
Hillary went to globalist, Skull & Bones Yale. I will have a hard time ever voting for a "Yalie" ever again after Bush, Kerry, President Clinton, etc.

They seem to think of themselves as the "elite". Forget they are where they are on the democratic social agenda by Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC