Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN's Bernstein cited Russert's misleading debate question as lead to problem in Clinton campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:57 PM
Original message
CNN's Bernstein cited Russert's misleading debate question as lead to problem in Clinton campaign
Edited on Wed Dec-05-07 02:57 PM by DeepModem Mom
Media Matters for America: CNN's Bernstein cited Russert's misleading debate question to Clinton as an explanation for "what led to the problem in the Clinton campaign"

Summary: On The Situation Room, Carl Bernstein accused Hillary Clinton of "dissembling" in her response to a question during an October 30 Democratic presidential candidate debate regarding the release of records from Bill Clinton's presidency, asserting that her response was "the opening" the other "candidates have been looking for." But Bernstein didn't note that the question, by moderator Tim Russert, was based on a falsehood. Bernstein has previously claimed that Hillary Clinton was "disingenuous" in her answer to the question.

*

On the December 3 edition of CNN's Situation Room, CNN political commentator Carl Bernstein responded to CNN commentator Jack Cafferty's question -- "(W)hat led to the problem in the Clinton campaign?" -- by citing a question by NBC News Washington bureau chief Tim Russert to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) during the October 30 Democratic presidential candidate debate about "the records in Arkansas." Specifically, Russert asked Clinton during the debate: "(T)here was a letter written by President Clinton specifically asking that any communication between you and the president not be made available to the public until 2012. Would you lift that ban?" In fact, President Clinton's letter did not ask that such communications "not be made available" but, rather, listed them as documents to be "considered for withholding." Bernstein accused Clinton of "dissembling" without noting that Russert's question was based on a falsehood, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly noted...Bernstein asserted that her response to the question was "the opening" the other "candidates have been looking for."

This is not the first time Bernstein has been critical of Clinton's response to Russert's question while failing to note that the question was based a falsehood. As Media Matters of America documented, Bernstein said on the November 2 broadcast of NPR's Morning Edition that Clinton was "disingenuous" in responding that "it's all up to the archives."...

http://www.mediamatters.org/items/200712050002?f=h_latest

Contact information:

CNN
One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
Phone: 404-827-1500
Fax: 404-827-1906

When contacting the media, please be polite and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and be sure to indicate exactly what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. One toughie from Russ and she's done?
In that case, there were other problems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't "considered for withholding" convey to the Archives "not be made available"?
I guess the rule only allows Clinton to ask that the material be "considered for withholding." But the meaning behind using that language is that Clinton would not like the material to be made available, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's a link, provided by Media Matters, with some info --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Media Matters is supported by the Clintons
So I'm not surprised they can't seem to recognize those two phrases mean the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC