Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's "Universal" Health Care claim rated "Barely True" by Congressional Quarterly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 08:53 AM
Original message
Obama's "Universal" Health Care claim rated "Barely True" by Congressional Quarterly
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/210/
Politifact is website of the St. Petersburg Times and Congressional Quarterly "sorting out the truth in politics."
Obama’s plan includes a mandate to insure children, but it does not include a mandate for adults, as the Clinton and Edwards plans do. That likely means not as many people will be insured, said Kenneth Thorpe, professor of health policy and management at Emory University.

So is it fair for Obama to call his plan “universal”? Well, not really. Even if you buy his argument that his plan will create the market conditions to make health care universally available, nothing in his plan guarantees it. We rate his claim Barely True.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. And looky here! All of Clinton's records on health care are available - barely true!
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 09:02 AM by babylonsister
Where are those records, and what is she hiding?


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/167/

"All of the records, as far as I know, about what we did with health care, those are already available."

Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, October 30th, 2007 in Philadelphia
Not all records are available
Barely True

At the Democratic debate on Oct. 30, moderator Tim Russert asked Hillary Clinton about delays in releasing White House records from her husband's administration and her tenure as first lady. The question has swirled around in recent weeks as she runs for president, in large measure on her record as a policymaking first lady.

She answered, in part: “Well, actually, Tim, the (National) Archives is moving as rapidly as the Archives moves. There's about 20-million pieces of paper there and they are moving, and they are releasing as they do their process. And I am fully in favor of that. Now, all of the records, as far as I know, about what we did with health care, those are already available.”

Clinton must be misinformed. It’s true that many of the documents from the unsuccessful health care effort that Sen. Clinton helmed are available, but there are several gaps in the record, such as her calendar and internal memos.

Judicial Watch, a conservative think tank and longtime Clinton critic, is suing to have its Freedom of Information Act request on the records filled.

Also missing from the records are any correspondence on health care between her and former President Clinton. That has been designated for review at the former president’s request. It's not knowable whether the documents will be cleared in time for either the primary or general election, but given delays at the National Archives and in the reviewing process, it seems questionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. All candidates are fair game, from "Pants-On-Fire Edwards" to Clinton's True claim re Edwards' Plan
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/179/

"When Sen. Edwards ran in 2004, he wasn't for universal health care. I'm glad he is now."
Clinton is correct. In 2004, when he was running for president, Edwards favored universal coverage for children but stopped short of proposing universal coverage for adults. At the time, he was concerned that true universal coverage would be too costly. "What we ought to be doing is something that No. 1 is achievable and No. 2 is responsible," he said at a debate in Manchester, N.H., on July 28, 2003.


The GOP gets a False on their attack against Clinton, too.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/197/

It's good to link out to a non-DU source when looking for Truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Good advice
but many on DU have no use for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Many are very... well, 'economical' with the truth, that's for sure.
And they think it helps their guy/gal? That's nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is a shame
Too bad the truth is irrelevant to Obama's new politics...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Truth isn't irrelevant to Obama, Pro
It's just inconvenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks,
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. I like Obama's character more than Clinton
but I must admit his plan pales in comparison to hers.

And hers is not very good either.

I want European style, government run, single payer healthcare. If it works in Europe and Canada, it works here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well Dennis has the best plan IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. oh for sure...
that's why I will be giving him my vote in the primaries. Too bad that it seems he won't move anywhere after that, but I'll give him my vote. He's earned it for his unequivocal defense of the Constitution and his patrotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary's Enforced Healthcare Insurance Plan tells us why it will fail
What happened in 1993 when Hillary basically tried to tell Americans they will be forced to buy healthcare insurance?

IT FAILED!

Why?

Because it's easy for Republicans to say it's forced healthcare insurance.

So what would change if the Hillary Plan was enacted?

NOTHING! It would still be expensive...it would still be insurance-based and not contain any real reliable reform.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. 14 year old Republican talking points
That don't apply at all to 2007.
What's next from ObamaNation? More junior high snickering over Clinton's personal hygiene?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Z opposes mandates. Obama's plan has mandates
Z won't talk about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I heard they a preparing to release:
Hillary has cooties!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Apparently it will fail because too many Democrats
are against it. Go figure. Lets save the money for Iraq and those making over 250,000 a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. There are plenty of people sitting around not wanting health insurance
because they are healthy and don't feel they need it enough to pay for it. 28 year old engineers and other such people, mostly young men, who can easily afford it but choose not to. When they crash their motorcycles, the taxpayers pay part of the ER and ambulance costs. That's why it's not universal unless there is a mandate.

While I want single-payer, I will settle for the mandated plans because they still get everyone covered. Once everyone is covered, then you have a constituency that may be interested in lowering their costs and improving the system further by moving towards single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Single payer is a mandate
It forces everyone to buy govt insurance.

All this talk about mandates is just political BS. There's nothing wrong with having the govt force people to do certain things. We do it ALL the time, but somehow, when it comes to health insurance it becomes EVIL

Big Pharma's propoganda is alive and doing well on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC