|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 06:55 PM Original message |
Awww! Play of the Day: Distracted Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. I love that name.. Emma Claire.. Its very pretty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 07:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. My daughter, born three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. I can't wait till the Edwards family is in the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. That sounds so good, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Edwards' big house will be a great presidential retreat. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yawn. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Did you mean this sincerely or were you poking fun at the big house? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. I'm not sure, but I know how Bush's ranch was built.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. This thread does not seem to be about that particular topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Which candidate has a small enough house? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a kennedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Dennis Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. LOL, that's what I thought. I sure hope he doesn't win the lottery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. IF ANYONE FROM THE EDWARDS CAMPAIGN IS READING THIS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. huh? why is the Edwards campaign too "highpowered" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I accused the Obama campaign of being too high-powered... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Can't say I agree. The Edwards are very, very wealthy people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Fair enough. Campaign-chest-wise Obama is wealthier. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. I think your idea is wonderful! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. By the sweat of his brow, Edwards, is now a wealthy man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 06:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. nothing wrong with that. And of course, I didn't say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. Compared to most Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
11. a lot of those dangerous Chinese toys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-14-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. He says that he wants it enforced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Permanent MFN was not necessary...and we lost leverage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. So this statement of yours is wrong and it has nothing to do with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Anyone can make a mistake...is this the reason Edwards voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. It is entirely possible that people were mistaken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. But the staff argument should apply to all members of Congress, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC