We like vicious uncharitable attack threads best.

[cleveramerican]

I'm sure I'm not the only one who's noticed.
If you post something about democratic unity, it sinks like a stone.
If you post somthing unfavorable to any candidate...
You get loads of responses, some agreeing, and some name calling.
(freeper seems to be the most oft-repeated)


what we like is what we get.

[denem]

1. A thread with the most replies doesn't mean it is the most liked

Even recs are often made to piss off the other side.

A vicious attack is usually unjustified. Those opposed. leap in to point out the errors, and express 'disdain'. DU is a club. Their 'not so good' friends jump in to join battle. If a thread is outrageous, few can resist the urge to express their disapproval or to snark their enemies.

[ccpup]

2. you're exactly right

which is why I'm less inclined to visit DU these days. There are better, less dramatic and bitterly partisan ways of getting the information about candidates and issues I want. And, right now, DU ain't it.

[Eurobabe]

3. Yeah and there are so many "newcomers" om here lately

one wonders how many members are just posting under other screennames to keep the pissing contest going? :shrug:

Same crap as in 2003 - 2004. Welcome to PRIMARY SEASON!! :hi:

[TreasonousBastard]

4. Vicious attack threads are easier-- no thinking involved...

just do your snark and split.

No research, no logic, no understanding... Just open fire. It's no wonder they're so common.