Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPROM Chips Fed-Exed from CA Secretary of State Turn Up Missing in San Diego

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:17 PM
Original message
EPROM Chips Fed-Exed from CA Secretary of State Turn Up Missing in San Diego
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 04:17 PM by aggiesal
First it was Broward/Dade County, Florida in 2000, next it was Cuyahoga (?) County, Ohio in 2004.
Rumors are flying like crazy down here that San Diego County will be gamed in 2008.
With Michael Vu (From Cuyahoga (?)) now setting up shop in San Diego, how can you argue with that logic?
Then read the following story. It would be funny if it were not true.

***********************************************************************************************************

SoS Confirms Precinct-Based Scanner Chips Missing, Will Voting Machine 'Sleepovers' Be Held Anyway?

Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org

Two shipping tubes sent from the California Secretary of State's office in Sacramento to the San Diego County Election Office arrived without their contents. The tubes left the SOS Office with more than 174 memory chips, or Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM), containing firmware for the county's Diebold/Premier central-count optical scan voting machines. UPDATE: Precinct-based op-scan chips confirmed by the SoS to be missing as well! See update info at end of article.

The tubes arrived in San Diego but they were empty. The chips are now considered to be either lost or stolen.

WIRED's Kim Zetter reports today...
Two cardboard shipping tubes containing more than 174 EPROMs loaded with voting machine software were sent via Federal Express from the secretary of state's office in Sacramento last week to election officials in more than a dozen California counties that use optical-scan voting machines made by Diebold Election Systems. But two shipping tubes arrived empty to one county on Monday.

In San Diego County, one of the empty tubes arrived with no lid on the end of it to close the tube; the second tube had a lid, but it was loosely taped shut.

According to Zetter, the new firmware was being sent to San Diego following software and security modifications made following the state's recent "Top-to-Bottom Review" of e-voting systems. The packages were sent from the Secretary of State's office after being packaged by Diebold/Premier employees with SoS personnel standing witness. The Secretary of State's office confirms that Diebold/Premier regularly uses Fed-Ex as their preferred shipper.

New chips will now be sent and the state says the February primary will not be delayed by the issue. The California Highway Patrol and Sacramento Police are now investigating.

But the story gets worse, in this LATE UPDATE (FROM BRAD):

We've confirmed, via an SoS spokesperson, that some of the missing chips were to be used for precinct-based optical-scan systems as well as central-scanners as reported originally by Zetter. Which raises new concern about allowing those precinct-based systems to be released to poll-workers for "sleepovers" prior to the election, as has been the notorious and dubious custom in SD. The practice may still be allowed in next year's election, according to recent comments by the SoS Debra Bowen, though with additional security procedures in place.

Now that there are actual "official build" chips out there, somewhere, that could be used to replace the chips during a "sleepover," that issue needs to be looked at closer than ever before, as we see it.

SoS spokesperson Nicole Winger confirmed in an email to The BRAD BLOG late this afternoon:
We understand some ePROMs were for the central office and some were for precinct-based machines. Of course, as soon as Secretary Bowen learned the news from San Diego, she asked law enforcement authorities to investigate. So we hope to learn more about this soon.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5462#more-5462
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. And so it begins... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depending on the value of the eprom chips lost, you might be able to hit them with grand larceny.
I dunno the relevant California laws dealing with petty larceny and grand larceny, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. wow so chips are what its down to
wonder what would happen at a collection center if you add 1 die hard republican + 1 small electro magnet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The 1 die hard republican's hair would not rise ...
it would stay neatly combed with hair parted down the side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. actually i was suggesting a repub would take a
magnet in a blue district and wipe out the chips with one swipe of a magnet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I didn't think that a magnet could erase EPROMS...
I know they erase magnetic strips, but I though EPROMS were
erased with florescent lighting.

Still believe that a die hard republican's hair would not stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC