Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biden Raises Security Questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:15 PM
Original message
Biden Raises Security Questions
From NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann
DES MOINES, Iowa -- If there's a safe space between politics and policy, Biden stayed in it until the last question of the day. A somber Biden appeared this morning at a hastily assembled press conference to address the assassination of Pakistani political figure Benazir Bhutto.

Calling her death "a genuine tragedy," the senator called for a transparent investigation into the attack and said that he had twice asked Pakistan's president to provide better protection to the slain Bhutto.

"This fall," he told reporters, "I twice urged President Musharraf to provide her with better security." He added, “The failure to protect Mrs. Bhutto raises a lot of hard questions for the government and the security services that have to be answered.”

Asked if his statement implied that Musharraf's government may have been negligent or even complicit in Bhutto's assassination, Biden responded that he cannot comment on any blame to be laid at the feet of the Pakistani government without knowing all the facts of the attack.

"Even if the security was not as I specifically recommended, it's not rational to draw the conclusion that the government wanted to see her assassinated," he said.

According to copies distributed by his staff, Biden, along with Senate colleagues Patrick Leahy and Joe Lieberman, drafted a letter to Musharraf to urge greater security precautions for Bhutto in October, just a few days after the first attempt on her life after her return to Pakistan.

Biden went on to note that Musharraf's cooperation with a U.S.-assisted investigation effort, and his subsequent allowance of democratic elections in the country, will be the best indicator of his government's intentions. "I don't want to pass judgment on it," he said. "Let's see how this investigation proceeds."

Biden, unlike Democratic rival Richardson, says that he is not calling for Musharraf to step down "at this moment," but added that he will increase pressure on the Pakistani leader if he drags his feet in the process of holding free and fair elections.

Reporters asked how turmoil in Pakistan might affect the Democratic race in the waning days before the caucus.

"I am a candidate, obviously," he said quietly, shaking his head. "But I am standing here before you today as the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee."

But, pressed further by reporters despite calls of 'Last Question!" from his staff, Biden acknowledged that his roles as candidate and foreign relations authority are hard to separate. "I would be holding this press conference were I not a candidate for president," he said. "I doubt there are any of the other candidates who would be holding a press conferences were they not candidates."

"That's not a criticism," he added. "It's an observation."


http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/27/535417.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have you noticed how...
the media keeps showing Mc Cain,Romney,Ghouliani,Clinton, Obama, as though these are the only statements they want us to see, I haven't seen Biden yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be refreshing to see Biden on Hardball. I just heard McCain
say he was the only one with the experience to handle the situation and he hoped the anchor "realized it soon". He also said, "ACTION has to be taken to secure the nuclear arsenal in Pakistan". This thing is not even close to getting started, and the US will be ramping it up and using it to keep the war machine going, and to elect a War Candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know.....
I'm so pissed about it....they have an agenda....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Steve Holt!
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. One more smart ass comment from you,
and I'm going to post an article about Pakistan's protest about Obama's comments a while back....I mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC