Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Win or lose, Obama and Axelrod have run a great campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 12:26 PM
Original message
Win or lose, Obama and Axelrod have run a great campaign
I think enough cannot be said about the campaign that Barack, David Axelrod, and his team have run. I bet there were not many that thought Obama would be in the position that he is in pre-Iowa caucus.

I supported Obama before his announcement in Springfield and have always believed he would be the best candidate to lead the US. But there have always have been doubts among Obama supporters from the start whether he could take on and stay competitive with the Clinton campaign. This has always been a valid doubt because like them or hate them, the Clintons are polished politicians and the Clinton machine is known to be ruthless for winning elections. And you cannot underestimate the popularity that Bill Clinton brought to the Hillary campaign.

But I would say Obama and his team are probably in the position that they have always wanted to be: in a position to win – not necessarily flat out winning. I think it was unrealistic to think that Obama would ever come out and be flat out crush the Clintons. And I believe Obama is still the underdog no matter what the Iowa or NH polls say. But Obama and Axelrod could not have asked for anything better realistically. Obama was an unknown politician, an African American candidate, and one with a funny name. But he has shown that he has wide-spread appeal among different people, even across party lines.

In addition, they have stayed competitive with Hillary in fundraising, have a strong organization on the ground, and have avoided making any major blunders. If you asked me about 10 months ago - I never expected Obama to outraise the Clintons in primary money. Of course their campaign has not been perfect, but no campaign is expected to be mistake-proof through a whole a year and with all the media scrutiny. (And the people on DU have made it known that his campaign has not been flawless, haha)

But I think Axelrod’s strategy of pitting change v. experience has worked well, with Obama edging out Hillary and Edwards on the change issue. Although Hillary is perceived as the most experienced candidate among the top tier, I think the angle that Axelrod have pushed is not who is experienced the most (which likely would be Biden), but who is experience enough. And most polls have shown that change outwieghs experience in this 'change election.'

So going in to Iowa tomorrow, I just wanted to share my appreciation for Axelrod and the Obama campaign for a job well done.

Lets hope tomorrow is a good day. Go Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. No matter what happens, Obama and Axelrod can be proud--
Obama has been a cool, steady, careful performer most of the time (the hallmark of a good solid general election prospect), and when he needed to be, he was inspiring, bold, and a fighter. He managed to get an unprecedented number of people inspired enough to donate to him, enough to make him competetive with the Queen, and that must have really rankled her (tee-hee!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Totally. Extremely smooth, very cool, very upfront, smart, well done, on point.
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 03:38 PM by annie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've come to the conclusion that Iowa really doesn't matter, and that Super Tuesday will be the only
gauge of this election cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. America being America, of course Iowa matters...
Obama did ok...Axelrod was only 'kindasleezy.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC