jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:54 PM
Original message |
MSNBC keeps saying Hillary and Obama both have 2-min. ads for tonight and Edwards has a 1-min. ad |
|
but the only ad they play part of (repeatedly, at that) is the Hillary ad. Why is that?
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Do they have the Obama ad to play? Call a campaign office and let them know. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 01:55 PM by xultar
Maybe they can get it to them.
|
flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Perhaps they do not yet have access to Edwards' and Obama's tapes. |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They want Hillary to win, of course. |
|
That's what you're saying, right? Big Media wants Hillary, ignore all those nasty, distorted articles and stories about her.
Poor little underdog Obama. Nice positioning, ducky. Does your ad say, We Try Harder?
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. No, that's NOT what I'm saying... |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Come on. WE got your message. I can't believe you didn't consider they didn't have it. |
|
almost 6 people posted the exact same thing within moments of each other. Your question seems to be a leading one. So, call an Obama campaign office and let them know. Report back.
|
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Obama hasn't settled on his final positions yet? |
|
And the Edwards spot is probabaly still at Kinkos.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. Obama's the only consistent one of the three. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 02:11 PM by jenmito
How can a Hillary supporter say such a thing as you did? It's Hillary who changes her positions whenever convenient...whenever her position is no longer popular. She even poll-tested to see if she should accept Streisand's endorsement, for god's sake.
|
surfermaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
21. For sure she hasn't been slandering democrats like Kennedy |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 02:49 PM by surfermaw
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. Right. She's been slandering Dems. like Obama. |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
24. The poster supports Richardson. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. Don't let the avatar fool you. |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
I've seen that a million times on Countdown.
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
28. She poll tested Streisand's endorsement? |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
29. Yup. That's what they reported in the news. Whether to announce it or not. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 03:19 PM by jenmito
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
“We would’ve low-keyed it,” the associate said. “But the campaign says it’s a net plus. They polled it. Among Democratic primary voters, even in places like Iowa, they love Barbra. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/29/how-that-streisand-endorsement-came-about-hint-not-like-buttah/
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
I'm no long supporting Hillary.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
39. You forgot the sarcasm thingy... |
|
but I guess that's all you could do when I was able to prove my point. :shrug:
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
It is true. I am no longer a supporter of Hillary.
This is the last straw. I can not go on supporting her. No campaigns have ever done any type of polling.
To think that she would poll La Babs?
Good god! I shall make it my life's mission to tell every gay man in America of this travesty.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
43. Seriously? So then you'll be an Edwards supporter? Are you busy starting your mission now? |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 03:37 PM by jenmito
Before it's too late?
|
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Very craft on Edwards' part! |
|
Since most Americans only have a one-minute attention span.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. Or because he doesn't have enough money... |
|
by his choice, of course. :eyes:
|
MalloyLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
34. He spent the money on a full page ad in the paper. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. It's too bad he couldn't afford both. |
MalloyLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
38. When you don't have Oprah sending you big checks it's kinda hard |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
40. Sorry to burst your bubble, but Obama has more donors who gave small donations than anyone else. |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Ummm ... an example of what's to come? |
|
:shrug:
If this bothers you, why don't you contact MSNBC and ask them.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Check the campaign websites now and see if all those ads are up. |
|
If not, the station may not have them to show.
And MSNBC isn't a satellite staple in many markets--and satellite is popular in rural IA.
|
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I had heard that Obama wanted to go live...maybe that's why |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. I just read an article that said he WANTED 5 min., but they didn't give it to him... |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 02:14 PM by jenmito
it would've been too controversial giving him that much time.
|
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. Everything I read said it was about them losing too much money |
|
giving him 5 minutes. Plus there was concern about equal time requests.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I heard THEY wanted HIM to speak live for 5 minutes |
|
but that he didn't think that would be fair to the other candidates, so he traded 4 minutes to Dennis Kucinich (to be used at an undisclosed later date) in order to shore up second chance votes.
But you didn't hear that from me.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Didn't Obama want to go live? I know he did with the 5 minute...not sure about the 2 min. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 02:40 PM by wlucinda
Could be that they're just not being pre-released.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yes, he wanted to go live. But he will have a 2-min. ad during the 6pm news. The live satellite |
|
would've been too difficult.
|
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. Well...I think it's smarter of Edwards and Obama to not pre-release |
|
No one can try and refute your comments if they dont know what you're going to be saying. :)
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. They just played a couple seconds of all 3 of the ads. n/t |
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
25. Well...there goes my theory. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Maybe the press only has a copy of the Clinton ad? |
|
I don't think that there's anything sinister behind it
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
42. They have all 3. They played a few seconds of them once, but they keep playing hers over and over.. |
|
they're playing it again as I type.
|
THUNDER HANDS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
44. this is Clinton's ad....it's pretty damn impressive |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-02-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
|
she sure does. It's amazing what such great lighting and a little collagen will do for ya.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |