Clinton people will give support to Biden, Richardon in some precincts to make them viable

[Herman Munster]

This prevents them from splitting supporters among Edwards and Obama and giving them an advantage by being unviable.

[itsrobert]

1. Is anyone surprised?

That the Clinton Campaign would stoop so low?

[Clintonista2]

3. How is that stooping low?

[jenmito]

6. Keeping them viable when they really don't have enough supporters to be viable

just to try to stop Obama from beating her.

[Clintonista2]

7. It's called strategy. There's nothing dirty about it.

[jenmito]

10. Strategy of someone who is losing.

[LSparkle]

9. Yep, so Richardson can keep saving the "damsel in distress" in debates

This is like tag-team wrestling ... yikes.

[jenmito]

14. This could be nothing more than the OP's opinion.

I see no link or reporting about it.

[SaveElmer]

13. So if you found out Obama was doing the same thing?

http://www.mydd.com/

Will your outrage continue?

[jenmito]

15. Yes. I'd be outraged.

But here is a better site: http://www.iowacaucusresults.com/

[no name no slogan]

16. It's called "the caucus"

this goes on in political party caucuses every year, everywhere. ALL candidates and their supporters do it.

[jenmito]

2. Biden and Richardson supporters may reject that and still go to Obama.

[Joe the Revelator]

4. Link?

nt

[ruggerson]

5. This is what I mean by the game playing

doesn't all of this kind of invalidate the results?

[LSparkle]

12. Makes it all seem like "Survivor" not picking a president ...

I agree with Edwards more and more - the SYSTEM needs to be changed; we don't just need a candidate who can play the "game" better than the others.

[frankenforpres]

8. it's a smart move nt

[TheDonkey]

11. GO BIDEN!

I like Obama but Biden would be my secondary.