fadedrose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:03 PM
Original message |
|
Damn. Hillary took John Edwards' line. Am watching her do her pitiful thing again. Change - from Edwards and Obama; Fired up - from Obama; and now "personal for me" from Edwards.
|
| HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yeah, but c'mon. It's Clinton. |
|
Should we really expect less?
|
| goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Does he have a trademark on that line? This is beyond petty |
| fadedrose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. You'd have to have seen |
|
and heard him deliver the speech where he says that - especially the one after the Iowa caucases.
He made a really big deal of it - ask anybody here - "Very personal for me" is an Edwards line.
|
| ElizabethDC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. I was honestly not aware of his saying that |
|
I'm not saying he didn't, I'm just saying it seems like a common enough phrase, and I wasn't aware that he had ever used it in any meaningful way.
|
| K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. He emphasized it in the Debate, clearly, and that's when HRC butted in and told |
|
him we "NEED A REALITY CHECK".
Now she's using one of his trademark lines.
|
| Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| fadedrose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-07-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 04:08 PM by fadedrose
Thanks for clarifying. I thought you meant Hillary at first.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
