dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:27 PM
Original message |
I suspect the swiftboating is just a pretext for massive vote stealing. |
|
How can they be so dumb, we wonder. Everybody in their right mind will deplore such vile filth. Well, the story line in SC-- which to my knowledge votes on DieBold Accuvote machines -- will be that "turned off" Obama voters stayed home while energetic Hillary supporters turned out in record numbers, moved by her latest strong-but-emotional Folgers commercial, and then vanished again.
And we'll gobble down every word Hill's CIA sockpuppets print. :crazy:
|
IndianaJones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
DangerDave921
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I never dreamed that the same line of attack that DU'ers used to use against Bush is now the basis for attacking a Dem candidate. Swiftboating? Stolen elections? Sounds like 2000 and 2004 all over again.
What is up with this? Are we now reducing Dem candidates we don't like to the same level of shenanigans as RW'ers?
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. it's how people justify their "I like him so everyone else must, too" candidate losing. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 03:35 PM by wyldwolf
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Like for example John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore in 2000. nt. |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. in 2000 and 2004 there was this thing called EVIDENCE |
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I have thought this for a long time. |
|
First provide a plausible narrative for the upset. Then steal the votes. Then dismiss all suggestions of election fraud, explaining that the change is readily explained by the narrative and that consequently there is no reason to look any further.
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yep. Just enough dust in our eyes |
|
to make Hill's next little miracle plausible.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the pre-emptive accusation.
|
2rth2pwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message |