Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How come Clinton, Kucinich and Gravel are on the Michigan ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:58 PM
Original message
How come Clinton, Kucinich and Gravel are on the Michigan ballots
but not Obama and Edwards?

What was the mechanism to be put - or not - on the ballot?

Just curious.

Heard that Dodd is there, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama and Edwards took their names off the ballot to honor the DNC
punishing MI for moving up its primary ahead of the February 5 date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was just looking at that.
Weird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Michigan is being "boycotted", but ...
... the other candidates were probably on the ballot before the boycott was in place.

The boycott is over the state trying to "game" the primaries. If anyone knows more about it, please post!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama and Edwards are pulling a "Guliani" and they are skipping it in favor of Florida...
Michigan is a bit cold this time of year so the two of them are going off for a little holiday in the balmy Palm Beach sun.:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. I thought that Florida was going to be "punished," too
One more reason to scrap the current system and move to rotating primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. all were initially on the ballot
Then Michigan moved up their date, and they all agreed to not campaign in Michigan.

Then a few of them decided to pander even harder to Iowa and New Hampshire voters and have their names removed from the ballot. A few succeeded. Kucinich tried, but couldn't figure out the paperwork in a timely manner.

So the rest remain.

All of them have upheld their signed pledge NOT to campaign in Michigan except for Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I realize the delegates will not be allowed to participate at the convention...
but what I am confused about is the voters in Michigan. Won't they feel that they have been dis~enfranchised? Regardless of the candidate~~~won't some (or many) voters stay home on GE day and fail to vote and perhaps give the vote to the repug? I don't understand how this won't offend the voters of MI.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:05 PM
Original message
There are two separate primaries
one for Republicans and one for Democrats.

Yes, Democratic turnout will probably be very low, but that doesn't gain any advantage for the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. But since the Democratic voters are going to be dis~enfranchised...
won't they get offended? I know it was their state that wanted to defy the DNC and to move their date ahead...it just seems like a big mistake that may cost us the state in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liz7 Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. yes, we (MI voters) have been disenfranchised
And we are offended. It's a ridiculous and unfair situation. However, there is the option to vote "uncommitted," and there is an expectation that Michigan will regain its delegates at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Thanks for that info, Liz7...
I haven't heard about this...I'm going to the google to read about it...and welcome to DU.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. That answers my dumb question from another thread.
Thanks.

Weird, though. I don't see how it does any candidate any good to remove themselves from the opportunity for votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I hope it doesn't come back to bite us on the *ss, but I have feeling it just might...
these were back~room battles and I think the damage is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mich is being punished and will get no delegates. Clinton is defying the DNC and is on the ballot
whereas Obama and Edwards are supporting the DNC and withdrawing from Mich. don't know about DK.

This could be the split in the Demo party. DLC vs. DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's a silly move to diss MI voters. they are having it tought.
I don't see how this is good politics. Come the GE we will need all the votes we can get. Some other penalty could have been used...but no delegates? We are shooting ourselves in the face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. It doesn't seem very logical to me either...
we dis~enfranchise them in the primaries and then come back to them in the general election and say to them..."Hey we didn't care about your vote a few months ago, but we want it now"~~~they may just stay home and tell the party to go eff itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Kucinich is on the ballot as well...don't forget HE is running for president still...
I don't think this will play well with MI voters for our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. There's something going around..
That Kucinich tried to get his name off the ballot and they wouldn't let him. Anybody know details...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. When the deadline approached he tried to get his name off...but misfiled or made some...
mistake and his name was kept on...he is on the ballot, still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. he didn't file the appropriate paperwork in time
He's not the world's most organized candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Bullshit
she's not defying anything. There was absolutely no requirement or even strong suggestion that they remove their names.

The only requirement was that they not campaign in Michigan, and Dennis Kucinich is the ONLY candidate to defy that commitment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. That's what I read as well, though I don't understand why he is defying the DNC...
the delegates won't count. It's screwy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Ok, I should have said that in my opinion Edwards and Obama are supporting
the DNC by taking their names off the ballot and Sen Clinton isn't. Is that better? It isn't a secret that there is no love lost between Sen Clinton and the DNC. Or is is a secret?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I didn't know that...
why would they dislike one another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. lol. You may think it is cute but sooner or later you will have to choose DLC or DNC. just sayin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
35. How dumb can the Dems be?
It seems there is no end to the ineptness of this party. Michigan gets totally disregarded? No delegates, a sham election. I don't know who is right, who is wrong. Just that this is a big screwup.

This disgusts me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. They were trying to kiss the ass of Iowa
To punish MI for their insouciance in the face of the Iowa deathgrip on America's political candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I disagree with the whole "Iowa is first" bull~crap too...
but this should have been resolved before the primaries began.*shakes head in disgust*

Michigan voters won't take kindly to this...come the GE instead of votes they may very well give our party the finger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liz7 Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. unfortunately you're probably right
But I think it only applies to some independents, not die-hard Democrats or liberals who are dead-set on electing a Dem, people who are thinking big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I hope so...
it just seems very un~American to dis~enfranchise voters like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. The Mich Demo party has to decide whether they are in or they are out. In, and you follow the rules
out and you can go vote repub and good riddance to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. What about Florida? I thought that it, too, is being
punished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yes I think Florida also but have no info. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Obama and Edwards are ethical, DK screwed up, Gravel is Crazy, and Hillary is all about herself
I think that sums it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Obama wanted more time to pander to the gay~hating bigot McClurkin...
and he wanted to be free to throw more gays under the bus. That's the sole reason he took his name off the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. and Dodd?
He's on the ballot, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC