|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:27 PM Original message |
Clintons and NSEA disenfranchising 60,000 Las Vegas Culinary workers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nevada meet Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. yes, being left out is a feature of a caucus---phyically present |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. delete-posted in wrong place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. HILL0RY EATZ BABYZ! HILL0RY EATZ BABYZ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. interesting that non of the school support people/workers in the union signed the petition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Were they asked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. They are members of the union that is going to court - just like the teachers. Don't know if they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Has the Court ruled on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Are courts always right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. No, but I didn't know the status of the case w/in the court system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. I think anybody can read statutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. I don't recall giving up anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. And all I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Thank you for clarifying. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. Andrea Mitchell says If the Culinary Union Wins Obama WIns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Andrea says what the people talking into her earpiece tell her to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. Don't look behind that curtain! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:38 PM Original message |
Wow...It looks like CLinton and her supporters are conducting a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. Hats off to these teachers wanting better access for voters! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. Nevada is a "no excuse" absentee ballot state, and has early voting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. If the lawsuit is successful, will the result be a net loss in Caucusing Nevadans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. in terms of number of participants, yes, of course. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
44. then that, my friend, is Voter Suppression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
70. Perhaps we resemble Repubs sometimes and voter suppression is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. This is from The Nation.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
54. I don't think that is what the court should be considering, at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #54 |
73. Not such a "side note"...Yeah, hillary didn't get the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #73 |
82. They've got 60,000 members.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. I can hope.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. irrelevant to this thread - this is a caucus not a primary - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Thanks, I stand corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. There is no absentee or early voting this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Thanks for the link. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Absentee voting NOT permitted for the caucus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. So then the problem appears to be dividing up the precinct? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Let's make it clear, Obama did not design this system. The state Dems did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. So is or is not the problem dividing up the "x"????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. I personally don't agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. I personally do not have a problem with the sites per se. I think there is another problem ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Yes, but the Clinton campaign's solution is to get rid of the sites entirely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. I'm from Florida. Have you read how sad I am? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. The lawsuit has ties to the Clinton campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. some people say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
77. By "some people" you mean the NYT and Associated Press? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
62. I think that is exactly what this issue should be about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
17. It is ok... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
23. disenfranchising? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. in practical terms, yes. This tactic is normal for GOP, not for Dems. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. So when I had a bad back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. No, you were just a Lazy Brokeback Monkey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #49 |
65. Heh. That was clever. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Yes, removing caucus sites at the last minute disenfranchises people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Work schedules are already set... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I don't completely understand your point. All the caucus participants have to caucus together. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. 500 caucus sites in Nevada - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
52. I don't understand your point. If they can't caucus at work, they can't caucus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. At a given time all caucus participants move to their candidate's spot. No participant can work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. It's scheduled to happen during a large shift-change... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. You seem not to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. you seem not to understand that these Caucus locations already legally exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. and the lawsuit is about the fairness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. But the ISSUE is about a campaign changing their mind about those sites... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #63 |
74. but no campaign is behind this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Officials within the teachers union have endorsed Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. I endorse Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. So unions don't endorse candidates for favors later on and vice versa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. Of course they are disenfranchised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I am thinking about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. it's not making voting more "difficult", it's making voting "impossible" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #69 |
81. If the judge shuts down the 'at large' precincts, what do you call it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. isn't the lawsuit also about "one voter one vote" so to speak ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. then shouldn't it be fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Yes. People just want to shoot the messenger instead of admitting there is a serious problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
38. There's now a legal right to make voting easy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
46. Yes, by taking away their existing Caucus location |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
25. Disenfranchising? A caucus state complaining about "disenfranchising"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
71. that's the point nobody's making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cd3dem (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
80. if they don't like the caucus system they should change to a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunonmars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
33. Well well well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
42. Yup. As my article below states, the CURRENT arrangement was agreed to by all until OBAMA got the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. The timing of this on the heels of the Obama endorsement really, really reeks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Yup. RW tactics by Dems. Their thirst for power knows no bounds... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
86. take a look at this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
45. Clinton in danger of alienating Nevada Latinos, not just African-Americans (link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
47. Having caucused from precinct to county to district to state before, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
85. The suit claims that the system for determining the number of delegates at the at-large is unfair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. And that the best way to deal with it is to get rid of the caucus sites... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
88. Doesn't this piss off other unions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
89. Uggghhh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 05:07 AM Response to Original message |
90. Senator Reid caught in middle? (link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVZ (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
91. Howard Dean and DNC side with Culinary Union and Nevada Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
92. Rules were set a year ago if they didn't like em, they should have said so. But to wait until two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
93. Repeated false accusations are the lowest form of dirty politics. Take heed, Obamites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Debunking to the satisfaction of the cognitive dissonant doesn't really count now does it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. You mean to the dissatisfaction of the cognitively dissonant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC