antiimperialist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 09:58 PM
Original message |
Polls gave Clinton 56%. She got 59%. Excellent n/t |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. she did`t win anything..... |
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
asthmaticeog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Totally awesome! She got no delegates within the margin of error! |
|
Pardon me while I spray my shorts!
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Statistically irrelevant. |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Wasn't she the only one running? n/t |
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
6. CONGRATULATIONS HILLARY!!! YEAH!!!! |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. HEY--I WILL JOIN YOU IN THAT SHOUT-OUT. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
7. so, the polling was accurate (within the margin of error) |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Wow! Within the margin of error! But I bet those zero delegates will come in handy. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |