Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hypocrisy noted: The Clintons and Billy Graham

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:14 AM
Original message
Hypocrisy noted: The Clintons and Billy Graham
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 09:19 AM by ProSense
More specifically (to take a not-so-random example), Billy Graham, who made some unambiguously anti-Semitic remarks to Richard Nixon which ended up on tape, appears to have been a major figure in Hillary Clinton’s spiritual life (see also this speech made by Bill Clinton at the inauguration of Graham’s library last year). While nowhere close to Farrakhan’s league (he appears to have been a repentant and occasional anti-Semite rather than an unrepentant and consistent one), he was a direct influence on the Clintons rather than an influence-on-an-influence. I don’t recall Richard Cohen, or anyone else, muttering that there was no evidence that Hillary and Bill Clinton were anti-Semites, but that they needed to voice their outrage or else. And for good reason; any suggestion along these lines would have been treated as crazy. Knowing that Billy Graham was occasionally anti-Semitic doesn’t tell you anything about what Bill and Hillary Clinton believe.


more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um, a little problem with your analysis
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 09:59 AM by Tarc
The Nixon tapes, where Graham's "Jews have a stranglehold on the media" comments can be heard, were not released until 2002, several years after Clinton was out of office. So how exactly could the former president and first lady condemn something that was, at the time of his administration, unknown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Will you please stop dealing with the FACTS!!
It doesn't play well around here. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Obviously not! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How do you know they weren't aware of it? They were good friends with the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Graham has been an advisor to almost all since Truman
The obvious exception being JFK. You are trying to pass this off like this was an exclusive relationship that Graham has with the Clintons and that is simply not true, as history shows.

Also, you're acting like the man was a raging antisemitic, and while his remarks on the tapes are repugnant, I don't believe any credible historian puts him on-par with a Louis Farrakahn or a David Duke. Given his outspoken support of Israel and refusal to join other evangelicals of the era in their proselytizing to convert Jews to Christianity, I don't think those comments were a deelpy-rooted part of his beliefs. Likely just a dumb recitation of pervasive stereotypes, which Nixon himself was certainly a believer of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Oh please. It is not as if Graham was blabbing it about. And Nixon brought out the worst in
people. It is unlikely that Graham would have said this to any other President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Wow, what a great excuse! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not excusing Graham - explaining why it is unlikely the Clintons heard Graham say anything anti
semitic. But you knew that and took the cheap shot anyway, didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You mean they hadn't heard anything about it through May 2007? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Dodge? Don't hurl insults, explain how that is a dodge? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. .
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "see also this speech made by Bill Clinton at the inauguration of Graham’s library " (May 31, 2007)
Also, it's not my analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. If You Want To Try To Convince The American People Louis Farrakhan=Billy Graham Be My Guest
I suggest you e-mail your candidate to make a speech equating the two...

Please...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Two things:
1) The piece was written by Henry Farrell, not me

2) He states: "While nowhere close to Farrakhan’s league..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Don't Even Have To Take A Side
If Obama and his supporters ask the Clintons to repudiate Billy Graham because they feel he is like Louis Farrakkhan that would be the biggest gift they they could give them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Here's My Take
Billy Graham is America's ceremonial preacher... Whenever there's a calamity - Columbine, Oklahoma City, 9-11, et cetera he's called upon to soothe the nation...It doesn't matter what DSB thinks about him...A candidate attacks him at his peril...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Here's my take:
If anyone wants to raise the notion that Obama condones anti-Semitic comments because of his association with a church, they're being completely hypocritical in overlooking the Clinton's personal relationship with Graham, who has made anti-Semitic comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Then perhaps you should have left that in Farrakan's thread.
Versus acting like a hypocrite in your own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. "Versus acting like a hypocrite in your own thread. "
Reiterating a valid point is now hypocrisy?

Are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Who needs to pull Billy Graham from the crypt when HRC's hubby has Rev. Al. in his pocket.
Yes, Bill and Hill have Rev. Al Sharpton, Jr., in their political pockets. IMO, the smarmy DLC spin machine don't wish to make nice when it's a fact that Reverend Al is on "speed dial" and comes when called to help in those oh so important "spiritual matters" (wink wink - racial undertones *always* with this persona). :crazy:

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/al_sharpton/index.html?inline=nyt-per

The Rev. Al Sharpton Jr. is a minister and an activist. But the two words don't begin to describe his role, or suggest the countless times in the last few decades that his name has been associated with discussions about race and racial tensions in New York City and even the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. So the guilt by association with Obama & Farrakan was bad.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 12:57 PM by rinsd
But the even thinner guilt by association with Graham is ok?

Hypocrisy noted: Prosense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Ah, pointing to hypocrisy is being a hypocrite.
Yikes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Except you weren't pointing out hypocrisy, you were making a counterattack.
Doing so with the same guilt by association tactic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. "Hypocrisy noted: The Clintons and Billy Graham"
No guilt by association:

Knowing that Billy Graham was occasionally anti-Semitic doesn’t tell you anything about what Bill and Hillary Clinton believe.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC