Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GDP in nuclear meltdown...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:20 AM
Original message
GDP in nuclear meltdown...
Everyone one has lost their minds tonight... so Obama credited Reagan with uniting people.... he was telling the truth... just look at the election results in 80 and 84... for the love of GOD... get over it already... there like 8 posts from one person on the main page about this... yes..yes.. we know Reagan had fucked up policies...but that doesn't mean he was unsuccessfully in pushing those fucked up policies... get a grip people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. "get over it already"... I am starting to think that's the Obama campaign slogan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Get a grip!"
Just get the BAM and shut up already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. I was thinking the same thing...Anyone who thinks Reagan accomplished anything, ever
... as an actor, husband, father, politician, President, or person -- is seriously in need of further education. He did far more harm than good ... although, barely conscious and never 'engaged' ... but, fortunately for his 'legacy', was 'bailed' out by others and circumstance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Reagan didn't even recognize his own son at his high school graduation. What a callous dick he was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
46. Umm...
Anyone who thinks Reagan accomplished anything, ever as an actor, husband, father, politician, President, or person -- is seriously in need of further education.

Ummm... you're joking, right? The man who represented conservatism throughout Nixon's triangulating, redefined the American political spectrum for a generation, and remade the image of the presidency in the television age? I think a lot of us at DU have some wishful thinking going on here. The man was incredibly talented, and unprecedentedly effective.

And if past threads are any indication, people will somehow take what I just said as an indication that I need to be educated in how bad his policies were. I don't. I lived through them (somehow). But this ridiculous attempt to deny Reagan's skills and to deny the extent to which he did inspire people is just silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes lets all praise the guy who united America by fucking America up, and hid it behind a warm smile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Reagan UNITED people? He was telling the TRUTH? Get OVER IT??? Silence = death
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 12:23 AM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. as strong as your reply is...it is off the topic at hand... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
68. No that poster was dead on
I'm sorry you don't get it. You have some homework to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. I think the poster was saying Obama was telling the truth.
Wow, how do you walk with your knee violently jerking like that?

:eyes:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
64. Wow, thanks for the nice insult after knowing me on here for 4 years.
You didn't happen to see any HIV threads going on at the same time, did you? Whatever, ciao.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
40. He united enough people to get elected in a landslide. I think that's what Obama admires.
And it's Obama who is telling the truth, not ol' Ronnie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. No offense, but Reagan was responsible for destroying the economy, among other things.
It's his bullshit economic policies (and Bush I and II's continuance) that have us in the debt hole we're in today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I agree with every thing you just said.....
but he was successfull in the sense that he did what he intended to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Charles Manson did what he intended to. Does that make him successful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. we are talking about uniting the country around a cause....
Manson didn't have the support from the american people like reagan did. I NEVER said Reagan did good things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. It depends on what you think of the cause.
Personally, I find it difficult to find anything he didn't screw up - the economy, education, taxes, deregulation, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
41. So did Hitler. Does that make him someone to be used as an example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yeah but he lied so well and the people ate it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silence Dogood Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reagan was a criminal. Remember Iran-Contra?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes, I know he was a criminal....that isn't what this is about... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. he united America against the Democrats
i thought we weren't supposed to like that around here. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. Don't you want Obama to unite America against the Republicans? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. yes, but that's not what Reagan did
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
38. ohh I was just agreeing with your earlier post about reagan...
I guess your right Reagan didn't unite anyone...that is why he lost his elections by such huge margins :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. i said he united people against Democrats, that's not reason to praise him
If Obama unites people against Republicans, that would be reason to praise him.

I'm against confusing what Obama wants to do with what Reagan did.

Now, head on over to RU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. This Reagan thing is one of the biggest non-issues ever to earn 1000 threads on du.
It is really quite silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Well, you've posted that a couple of times, haven't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
39. Well he's making a perfect accurate point.
This is just another instance of DU making Mount Everest out of a molehill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Obama cult crucifies Hillary for telling the truth about LBJ/MLK
:tinfoilhat:bama lies about what a great guy Reagan was for no good reason except pandering and the :tinfoilhat:bama cult takes another big swig of Kool-aid:spray: and defends this empty suit of a candidate. Maybe BO should go back to Harvard and study history for awhile before he comes back on the national stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
36. Obama knows his history.
He is a showman and nothing more.
He is kissing Grover Norquist's ass by saying this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
44. The problem with the LBJ/MLK comment imo
It seemed to give more credit to LBJ than to MLK.


I agree Pres. Johnson did a fantastic job and showed both great courage and conviction when it came to civil rights. Dr. King, on the other hand, risked and ultimately sacrificed his life for what he believed in.


It was the civil rights activists that began the movement and made the legislation that followed possible.

The actions of the government reflected the movement in the nation. The civil rights movement did not come into being because of the legislation.

I phrased that poorly, so let me try this.....


Horse = civil rights movement
Cart = civil rights legislation


The Horse pulled the Cart, the Cart did not pull the horse.


She put the Cart before the Horse.




ALSO, Obama did not lie about Reagan. Everything he said was accurate. He did not say "Great Guy" or anything like it. He did not insult Reagan (much) but I don't think he praised Ronnie either.


As far as being an "empty suit"

At least he built his own political machine and did not inherit it from a spouse or parent. We have seen what a terrible president a family member who gets help like that can be. Hillary would be a terrible president. Deal with it !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
74. And you missed yet another oppurtunity to say Barrack Hussein Obama.
You're slipping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Reagan lied to the public and sold them a bill of goods
He appealed to their lesser selves and made them think racism and prejudice was acceptable. I guess you would call it uniting through dishonesty. Not praiseworthy nor worthy of modeling for a Dem presidential campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. I've held my tongue on this whole Obama thing until now, but
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 12:31 AM by Jamastiene
I don't trust any Democrat who touts Reagan or his policies as a good thing in any way shape or form. There is just no way in hell I can trust him after that, not that I trusted him before that either. I certainly won't be giving him my ear a second time after that shit though. Don't like it? Get over it already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Show me where he said Reagan's "policies" were a good thing.
A link will be fine.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. He said liberalism had gone too far and that is part of why Reagan won
It is in his book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. He said people thought liberalism had gone too far
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 01:22 AM by dmesg
And he was right, a lot ofpeople thought that in the early 1980's, which was a large part of why Carter carried WV, MN, GA, MD, DC, RI, and nothing else.

People were disappointed with progressive politics and Reagan led a national political realignment by articulating a narrative describing that realignment and effectively communicating it to the nation. Similarly, people are currently disappointed with conservative politics and Obama is hoping to lead a national political realignment by articulating a narrative describing that realignment and effectively communicating it to the nation. They're both "big picture" kind of guys, not wonks.

ON EDIT: my bad, Carter took Hawaii too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. He never touted reagan's policies...I would love a link....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. What does it say about a Democratic candidate when he has to reach to
the legacy of a republican to make his case. P fuckin U. My pary sucks I know, I'll be more like that guy over there. Please vote for me in the primary Mr. Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Did he say "P fukin U" and all that??
Or is that just a straw man argument that your using agianst him. Reagan still polls high in this country. If the dems start calling Reagan the fucking anti-christ(which he is) than we will continue to lose elections to the repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. It says he's a DLC'er n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. He is attacking the originator
so its a damn sight worse imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. United people in greed and mistrust.
That was ultimate divide and conquer. He made everyone mistrust eachother. He destroyed the cooperative spirit in true Republican fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
28. The same can be said about Chimpie and 9/11
And Hitler in Nazi Germany.

9/11 gave the chimp the highest approval rating of any president, including Regan, and it made him successful in pushing the most fucked up foreign and domestic policies in more than a century.

Uniting the country is not necessarily a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
31. To be fair, most Obama supporters were still in diapers
during the Reagan years. Kids, if you want to gain some political cred, take some time to learn who were some of the worst enemies of our country.

Remember when Reagan's Atty General Ed Meese said "the Bill of Rights was just an amendment to the Constitution". He felt it wasn't a real part of the Constitution and could be repealed. St Raygun and his gang were famous for being strict interpreters of the Constitution and bred the gang of criminals that were elevated in Bush's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
32. Ask gay people and black people how much Reagan "united" people
In particular ask someone who knows someone with AIDs or lives in Philadelphia, Mississipi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
34. I prefer the term "hair on fire"
It's so much more... picturesque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
37. If someone thinks Reagan united people
they must be too young to remember the Reagan era. There are a lot of people he didn't unite, and I'm one of them.

Reagan was a stupid fuckstick and a corporate tool. I remember him as an asshole even before he became the governor of California.

He has helped to significantly contribute to the decline of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. Two pictures:
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 01:17 AM by dmesg




Reagan convinced a large majority of the country about his message. Period. And for all of the 1980's the Left absolutely failed to come up with a coherent, let alone inspiring, counter-narrative.

Don't tell me how bad his policies were, I know. But he convinced a whole lot of the country they were good. He realigned the political system and changed the narrative and debate for a generation to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. Raygun did this by starting his campaign in Philadelphia Mississippi
and using the hostages in an arms deal with Iran. By this standard Hitler was great as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Sigh
By this standard Hitler was great as well.

And?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. When will Obama praise Hitler, Mao, Franco and all the other agents of change
Just because they made the trains run on time doesn't make them good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. It's not about "making the trains run on time"
I mean, the man wasn't an iron-fisted dictator and he didn't really "do" much. He wasn't even awake in most cabinet meetings. He was not a policy President, and that worked well because people viewed Carter and Mondale as wonkish micro-managers who were too lost in the minutiae of policy to actually come up with and effectively communicate a message.

I mean, honestly, what do Presidents actually do? It's a communications job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
49. Just read an excerpt from Obama's book ... and, IMO, you're obscuring
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 01:19 AM by sjdnb
the truth about what he said about Reagan to minimize it. Everyone should just check this book out at their library and read/interpret it for themselves.

Edited to read obscuring vs obfuscation - because you're not just trying to confuse, you're obviously trying to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
50. This thread proves your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
51. Silence = Death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
55. Successfully pushing "fucked up policies" makes him someone to emulate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #55
62. Umm... yes
The key is "successfully". Obama was comparing Reagan to Nixon and Clinton and pointing out that Reagan achieved a fundamental shift in the national debate and national consciousness, which neither Nixon nor Clinton did. That's what Obama wants to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
56. You get a grip. For Obama to hold that murderous felon up
for any reason is f#cking disgusting.

You want to get in bed with Reagan and Obama, go for it.

Fucked up policies, baloney. He got people dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Not you, too
For fucks sake, Obama wasn't "holding Reagan up" he was explaining his appeal and how he got people to vote for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. Because there aren't enough other role models to chose from.
Yes, me, too.

I can't throw a rock in my neighborhood without hitting a family that lost someone to fucking Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Reagan changed the politcal landscape in this country
I thought that was undeniable. Acknowledging that doesn't equal praise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #61
73. Reagan is why 9/11 happened, if you think through his policies.
I don't give a damn if Obama snorted coke while dancing naked on the interstate.

But his reaching out beyond the Democratic base via the myth of Ronald Reagan is nauseating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
58. The Iranian students who held the hostages so long united America
I was alive and paying attention then. It wasn't Reagan who did that. It was the constant reminder of a humiliation and the kidnapping of 50 or so U.S. citizens. Get that one straight. Reagan was close, thanks to turn coat, hypocrite John Anderson, but it was no lock. The final even with the hostage issues was Reagan about 2.5 million above Anderson + Carter (the anti Reagan vote). How is that uniting the country.

2004 - that's another story. In year two of his term, his popularity sucked then he was shot and it bounced considerably, but by 2006, the tide had turned and he was not liked.

It's the myth making that brings him back up the ladder and the guy was very charming when he told a story. Four years of above 50% is not exactly a galvanizing force or record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
63. If young inexperienced Obama does not know of the pain and suffering he caused so many of us because
his deception of U.S. citizens by trading weapons for hostages and financing right wing death squads in Latin America (just ask Oliver North about all this) while thousands, I'm saying thousands lost their lives to the so called "Reagan freedom fighters" in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Chile, there is no forgiveness for this! By mentioning Reagan's name Obama is siding with Reagan and that is intolerable and unacceptable for someone who wants to represent true Democrats and the rights of the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
65. Piece-O-Shit Reagan sucked, and will always suck, especially to a true progressive!
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:14 AM by balantz
And Obama has thoroughly shown what he is made of to me, which is a whole lot of empty suit ready to be filled by the corporate fascist agenda that will rule through his stammering philosophical talky-talk as they politically mow his ass down while he stutters his dream of hope and unity speeches to his googly-eyed folks. He thinks he will get in there with all these back-room deals and table-talks and bring everyone together because he is so shining spectacular for all Americans. Frankly I think there is some egotistical blindness lurking within the great uniter. I'm sorry, he scares me, and I am just letting my nice dam break because I think people need to hear it from observers on the outside of the Obama bubble. I am AFRAID for America, and the future of my children, and we need to seriously consider who will hold the reigns of power in this oligarchy that needs to be completely turned over. And no I am not racist, or sexist, just truly progressive and scared shitless at what I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
66. Obama didn't "praise" Reagan any more than Hillary "said LBJ, not MLK, furthered
the Civil Rights Movement."

I've posted several threads on NEWS, important links to first-hand reports from Pakistan, etc., with absolutely no response. It seems people are expending all their energies into proving their candidate right and the other candidates wrong. I think that energy could be more wisely spent elsewhere, rather than bickering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
67. The Clintonites are scared
The manufactured hysteria coming from their ranks is hilarious. Obama's comment that Reagan was a more transformational president than Bill has sent them over the precipice into oblivion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
69. Ironically enough, Reagan would be proud tonight.
He spent 8 years trying to end this planet in a nuclear meltdown. At least he finally accomplished doing so at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
70. So Obama want to unite us some more to fuck over average people? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. Nah..
He wants us to draw inspiration from a cynical politician that ran an "optimistic" racist campaign. Thank heavens Reagan inspired and united all the bigots to vote for him. (both Dem and Rep). Now Obama can tout the vision thing and maybe pick up a few Republican voters to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. No, he wants to be the progressive reagan
Get things back on the right track, and swing the "center" back to the left, the way Reagan swung it to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC