CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:07 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Why Do YOU Support Senator Clinton? Forget Groupthink |
|
Dear HRC Supporter,
What factor below is the clincher for you?
Thanks for registering *your* opinion.
- Dave
P.S. For me, after it seemed certain that Gore, Kerry, and Mark Warner were out of the running in the primaries, I bought into the electability meme, and Senator Clinton became my "I can live with it" choice. After spending time with thoughtful friends, family members, and a DUer or two on here, and after following up on some suggested research topics, I went from skeptic of, to strong supporter of, John Edwards. In the process, I went from "I can live with it" to "America can't afford it" in my views of my prior choice. But that's me. What about you?
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The reaction to Iowa made me mad. |
|
Very much like the reaction to Anita Hill's testimony made me mad. At that point, the bullshit became visibly obvious.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. What Do You Mean by "the reaction to Iowa"? The Obama Inevitability Meme? Or??? |
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I never was in love with any of the three main contenders, but felt like Hillary had the best chance of winning the GE. That wasn't enough to win me over, however. The disgusting way both Obama and Edwards, along with the rabid media, piled onto her after Iowa was disgusting. So initially she became the one I disliked the least. I finally came completely around and took a stand that she was my candidate.
Now that I'm on her team I truly support her and believe that she will be a wonderful president. I learned a lot more about her that is incredibly impressive.
:loveya: Hillary
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
tandem5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
34. I felt and feel the same way nt |
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You forgot the fact that she is unrelentingly tough |
|
she will never give an inch to the rightwing, she will stomp them to death.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. That Falls under Other, and Thank You for Specifying! |
DemExpat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
16. Absolutely, a big plus here. |
|
She has been through almost every attack imaginable.
I think that she is the most electable Dem candidate, I like her, and feel her qualities would make for a good and effective president.
I probably see about 60% of her actions, ideas and qualities as positive and matching my own ideas of the best Dem President, but this is clearly more than for any other candidate.
DemEx
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
... do you think the well of information that could be used is dry, and we'll only hear rehashes?
Thank you, sincerely, for any clarification.
- Dave
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
The hair? For me it was Other: The Snappy Pantsuits. :headbang:
BTW - Does Chi-Chi have special plans for SC?
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Its really a mix of the above |
|
the fact is, I think shes the best choice to lead this party. She gets good reviews from pretty much everyone she works with. I think the main reason there has been some opposition to her in the party is due to the negative propoganda that has been built around her and fears she cannot overcome it. But I do not believe that.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. Party Builder? I Would Never Have Thought... |
|
... to include that, so thanks for spelling it out.
Sincerely,
- Dave
|
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. If Senator Clinton Said You Had to Pick ONE... |
|
... though, which would it be?
; )
Don't make me pull out the big gun scenario of Bill asking you.
- Dave
|
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
9. John Kerry was electable. Mike Dukakis was electable. |
|
"Electability" is a total copout. It's an attempt to mind-read what the perceived electorate wants. Worse yet, it panders to the whole "focus group" mentality of governing by opinion polls instead of by convictions.
FDR didn't run this country by focus groups. LBJ didn't use opinion polls when he signed into law the Civil Rights Act.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
18. But Why Do YOU Support Her? |
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. IF she is the nominee, I will support her |
|
I was more commenting on the fact that most people supporting her (according to this poll) was because she was "electable".
That is a VERY dangerous thing at this point in the race.
It says that people don't like her platform, but are only supporting her because they think she can win.
But what if she wins, and she doesn't represent the things you support? How have you won? Or have you won at all?
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
... and you're preaching to a member of the choir, but I'm very interested to see why others are cleaving to her candidacy at this point.
- Dave
|
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
Let's just say, as somebody who busted his ass for Dukakis in 1988 because he was the most "electable", I find this poll verrrrry verrrrry iiiiiinteresting.... :thumbsup:
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. That Was the Last Election... |
|
... in which I couldn't vote.
- Dave
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
26. Hm, I'd disagree. I never thought either of them was most electable - or, more |
|
precisely, I never thought either of them was tough enough to beat the GOP.
I do think HRC is.
|
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But to those who think Hillary Clinton is the most electable I have 2 questions:
1- Can I have some of what you're smoking? 2- Have you been living under a rock for the past 20 years?
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. The OP Is an Honest Attempt to Understand... |
|
... so please don't.
- Dave
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. P.S. Does GMU Stand for George Mason University? If So, Howdy, Neighbor! |
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
I see you're from Alexandria very cool. I'm not a native Virginia though.
And my fear is that Clinton will turn out the Republican base in a way that none of the current Republican candidates actually can. Even though many of them may not like McCain or Romney or Huckabee, if we nominate Clinton they will come out just to vote against her.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
36. Preaching to the Choir... |
|
... and I grew up in West Virginia, with lots of family scattered throughout the Upper South/Appalachia/purplish border states that *could* flip blue with the right nominee this cycle.
But I really am curious about the motivations of continuing Clinton supporters.
What are you studying? My partner did his first graduate degree at Mason.
- Dave
|
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
But I'm a government and international politics major appropriately enough. I'm hoping that VA's primary on the 12th will matter.
I'm still a New Yorker so I'm used to her as my Senator triangulating and caving into the GOP, so I don't see why she would be any different as president.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
|
... my partner enjoys helping GMU alums/students in the area, and my degree was in Government.
Sounds like we'd have a lot to talk about!
:toast: <---- oops, you probably can't drink yet
- Dave
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
1. I don't do drugs. Nothing wrong with them - I just don't do them.
2. Nope - been living right here.
She's the toughest candidate we've got right now, the most tireless fighter. Bill Clinton is the only Dem to take the WH in over 2 decades, because he was the only one tough enough and smart enough to do it.
|
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
37. She was also "unelectable" in NY |
|
when she ran for Moynihan's senate seat. Carpetbagger, remember? And Rick Lazio was the local Long Island boy.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Points 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 7's not too bad either. |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message |
25. I can't support obama because of his REPEATED pandering to BIGOTS... |
|
Despite major misgivings about Hillary - compared with Obama - she's the better candidate...
It's more AGAINST obama.
And, besides, Hillary was pusing for Universal Health Care before it was "fashionable" to do so...
Obama is death by a thousand cuts...
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
35. Is Edwards Completely out of Your Analysis Now? |
|
Just curious.
Thanks!
- Dave
|
DemCam
(911 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
27. cause she has earned her stripes |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Where's the 'I don't support her' option? |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
38. Implicit in the Poll... |
|
... is that you support her.
- Dave
|
agdlp
(363 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Most knowledgeable and proven record on bipartisan politics |
|
That’s a difficult question..But for starters I am amazed of her deep knowledge on a huge variety of areas and seem to be on top on the important issues facing the nation (like the economy) and being elected as a NY senator, a highly republican city twice, tells me that the conventional wisdom is wrong. Remember she was a republican in her youth, and have a track record of working with republicans to find solutions.
I think she knows that for solving the problems, she has to find bipartisan solutions
But the one issue that is critical is having been hit with so much “troubles” in her life, still managing to cope with it all in a sound fashion. Both on the psychological, emotional, and work related...she has overcome everything that has been sent her way. I do think she have a unique ability to handle crises when they occur, and thus will be a wonderful commander in chief.
And right now the country is facing enormous challenges, and i am confident she wil manage them..thats why I support her. Not because of her gender, not because of her husband, but because she is the most skilled politicians out there, and do know how to work with people with opposite views finding solutions.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
- Dave
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message |
32. I believe she would be a supremely competent president. |
|
She has a great grasp of a variety of issues.
|
sonroadera
(115 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
40. I am not surprised so many choose "Electability." |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
|
I'm surprised by it, at this point in the process.
- Dave
|
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
42. Other: She is the most effective of all candidates running |
|
She knows how to push through legislation, and she knows how to deal with Republican opposition.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
43. Electability Voters - Please Note... |
|
... that in much less time, the opposition poll has registered more votes than this one.
- Dave
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
44. She knows how to get the job done. |
|
She knows the processes and people in the Senate, White House, state governments, leading other countries, NGO's, non-profits and business. Frankly we are going to need someone who knows how to get up in the morning with a plan to get us out of the mess Bush Inc. put us in.
We don't need someone who needs on the job training again, or has surrogates do his work for him, like we've had for the last 7 years.
She isn't Bill and this country has real problems to deal with. We want concrete solutions and actions, not just pretty words and promises.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-25-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
... compare to the OPPOSE poll.
- Dave
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
53. This Poll Is Lagging the Opposing Poll ... |
|
... so here's a pity kick.
- Dave
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |