Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:41 PM
Original message |
Hillary leading absentee voters in California 53%-30%, about 50% of votes expected to be absentee |
|
http://www.calendarlive.com/media/acrobat/2008-01/34975049.pdfAbsentee voters are strongly supporting Clinton by 53% to 30%.
|
Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message |
Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. she has tons of votes already banked |
|
before Kennedy or South Carolina or any of this other nonsense.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm a CA voter and the early voting certainly favors Clinton |
|
since many voted before Obama became a more viable and legitimized candidate. Clinton should carry CA with Art Torres and the Democratic establishment strongly involved in her campaign for as long as it has been. Just hoping Obama picks up a nice share of delegates
|
THUNDER HANDS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
4. as long as a candidate gets 30% or more of the vote |
|
they'll get essentially the same number of delegates as the winner.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. That just doesn't seem right! |
|
Oh, well, that's California!
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Is that true? If so, "representational democracy at its best." |
|
That'd be dispicible if true.
|
THUNDER HANDS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. yeah, you need 15% to get delegates |
|
and 30% to get close to half.
In a 3-person race anyway.
If Hillary had gotten 1% more in South Carolina, she would have picked up way more delegates.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
And insulting to the integrity of the Democracy we supposedly uphold. I hate the delegate and electoral system. Hate hate hate.
|
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Excellent! Thanks for posting this. |
|
I just skimmed the link but will read more later. Looks good so far!
|
tandem5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message |
8. yep, I've already voted for her. nt |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Just out of curiosity, has your stance changed? |
tandem5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. No, I've been solidly in her camp now for a few months... |
|
before I was also considering Edwards strongly.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
12. this is just a poll, people |
|
they do not count the votes until election day. just another poll.
|
indie_voter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. I was going to ask.. I thought they had to wait until election day? n/t |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
14. The same source: "Obama leads by 41% to Clinton’s 28%. |
|
among "declined-to-state or independent registered voters."
|
Beacool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Thank you CA, pls. keep it up!!!! |
|
Hillary needs your support!!!!
|
comradebillyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
17. good, she needs a solid win right now. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |