Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Campaign: No Snub Intended (Hillary's surrogates distraction from disgusting)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:19 AM
Original message
Obama Campaign: No Snub Intended (Hillary's surrogates distraction from disgusting)

Obama Campaign: No Snub Intended

On “Morning Joe,” Obama chief strato-man Axelrod said The Snub wasn’t a snub, but simply a matter of Obama dealing with the “awkwardness” of the day and wanting to give Kennedy and Clinton a private moment.

Press buzz, pix suggested Obama purposely turned away from Clinton as she shook Sen. Kennedy’s hand at the State of the Union speech.

Plus: The Hill notes the momentous exchange between 43 and a possible 44: “Hey buddy, how’s it going?” Bush said to Obama on the way out of the House chambers.


"'Awkwardness'of the day" was when the disgusting Marcia Pappas, NOW-NYS, claimed that Kennedy's endorsement was a: Psychological Gang Bang of Hillary is Proof We Need a Woman President, which was followed by damage control: Statement of NOW President Kim Gandy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. The CHIEF strategizer had to deal with this mess?
All I ask is, in the second when Ted was stretching out his hand and Obama was deliberately turning away, a big fat "UH OH!" raced thru Teddy's mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very troubling on Obamas part...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, right obama....you just showed the nation what a vindictive
prick you are. you had a moment that would have extended the good of the day you receive from the kennedy endorsement, but you showed no class and the nation saw it.

But the nation saw HRC come into their tv screens all smiles and happy and greeting folks and folks greeting her..The lasting image of the day is a positive for HRC and a negative for you.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yea, how DARE he give Hillary and Ted some privacy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yeah - keep repeating it, like anyone will believe it.
Just accept that he fucked up and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Right! Nothing says "privacy"
like a State of the Union speech on every channel!
Nice try. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. people can still have privacy in a crowded room
if they wish to exchange greetings and/or some small words, and i could understand that Obama wouldn't want to stay close while they did so(awkward situation since the two of them are friends and that there might be some slight friction because of him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Because it was an AWKWARD moment??
That gives one a lot of confidence in someone who would have to face a lot of "awkward moments" as President. OK, actually it doesn't give me a lot of confidence ...

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Scumbag Axelrod admits it was on purpose!! "Obama also maneuvered himself to shake Bush's hand."
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/01/realpals.html
Obama also maneuvered himself to shake Bush's hand. They exchanged smiles and, in the true Texas style of governors greeting legislators, Bush said, "Hey, buddy, how's it going?"
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. The same Axelrod who denied the appeal to GOP voters in Nevada even
as the radio ads were playing???? Could it be??? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't believe for one minute that Obama snubbed Hillary.....
...way too uncool. But give me 5 minutes and I'll get back to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. so now
Obama is baically admitting that an exchange could have happened but that it was awkward. He would have been better off saying he hadn't seen her or someone had called his name and he turned away.... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. How soon till Hillary supporters start referring to Obama as "Bush's buddy"?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama had a chance to exhibit decency/diplomacy. He blew it. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. ...weeks ago.
The facade has fallen away from the Fairy Tale Prince.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Once again, Obama appears to be very thin-skinned!
Not good, not at all for someone who wants to be next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. It all works as long as he's the Dictator...
and Cheney is the Dictator's remote puppetmaster, sitting at home typing out the orders of the day.
So tell me, how would Kennedy and Kerry control the newly elected Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Snub, Awkward, Doesn't Matter
If Obama is elected POTUS, he's going to have to learn to deal with awkward moments. You know, like trying to go out through the in door, barfing on people's laps, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. One of the problems of youthful drug abuse is the failure of the indulging young person to confront
issues and mature accordingly.

We certainly have had an example of the consequences of such behavior over the past eight years. Despite all the feel-good rhetoric, it looks as though we may be setting ourselves up for more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. oh that's just bullshit and you know it-
sounds like a Rush limbaugh stretch-

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Bullshit yourself. Grown men -- and one would certainly expect
United States Senators -- do not act that way. For what ever reason, he needs to grow up. And my statement stands, as it applies to George Walker Bush and Senator Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. HUMAN BEINGS are not immune from
error, or having their actions misinterpreted- regardless of their SEX-MATURITY- OCCUPATION-FAME-

Mature human beings, who have true integrity, don't slander others, based on their own personal prejudices and political leanings.

I don't know what happened between Hillary and Barrack- only they do. I would have rather they had been able to greet each other politely- but they didn't. You choose to use this incident to attack the one you do not like. I refuse to blame either one of them, as, it really IS something that is between them- not us.

Your attempt to use this incident to drag Barrack down by mentioning his previous ADMITTED- drug use speaks volumes about your own past, if your statement were to have any actual relevant merit. Not to mention what it says about so many of the posters on DU.

Obama has taken responsibility for his past bad choices. He doesn't excuse it, or deny it, minimize it, or try and hide it.

How many politicians can you name who do that?

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Barack Obama has admitted his past drug use and given us his version of it.
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:10 PM by Benhurst
Whether it is a full one or protective cover, I have no way of knowing, nor do you. Whatever the case, it might, though, explain his his behavior last night, which was shockingly immature.

My mentioning his past drug experimentation hardly drags him down since he has written about it himself. As you point out he doesn't excuse it, or deny it, minimize it to our knowledge, or try and hide it. Therefore there is no reason it can't be talked about.

I hope his past behavior was not as destructive as George W. Bush's, for Dubya is undoubtedly continuing to manifest problems associated with his abuse. But Obama, himself, has made his own drug use a matter of public record, so it is certainly something open to discussion. The corporate media for the time being is giving him a pass. If he gets our party's nomination, his past drug use will not only be discussed, but investigated as well.

John Kerry's heroic Vietnam war record was turned by the corporate media against him, while it continued to hide AWOL Bush's cowardly behavior. And Al Gore's words were twisted by the press in such a way to make his genuine accomplishment look foolish.

Do you really think Obama is going to be given a pass on his past drug use?


Adolescent drug experimentation often does have harmful side effects and interfere with the maturation process at a crucial time in one's development. While Senator Obama may not have suffered such impairment, last night's behavior certainly gives reason for concern. The past eight years under an impaired president have been eight years too many.

But even, as I hope, Senator Obama survived his youthful indiscretions relatively unscathed, he is still not out of the woods. When the corporate media turns on him, which it will, no quarter will be given. He has given them a club and don't kid yourself they won't use it.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I'm not going to keep running round in circles with you. It is
pretty clear we aren't going to come to any mutual agreement.

You can talk around the issue all you like. You were using this hand-shake issue to beat up on a candidate you clearly have no liking or respect for. Do you always assume the worst of everyone? (yeah, he was above board about his drug use, but was it accurate?) :shrug: You may want to really ask yourself if you have some unconscious personal prejudices at work here.

You excuse your negative spin by saying "wait till the corporate media turns on him"- as if that is the compass you us to guide your life- If it is, I sincerely pity you. All the youthful drug use in the world, isn't going to match that-


peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Oh, well. Some don't don't want to live in a reality based world.
No matter how we all feel about the corporate media, it is a very real and dangerous part of our lives.

But drink the Kool-Aid and be prepared for four more years of Republican rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. You shouldn't say such nasty things about the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. He is SULLEN...he's either pissed at Kennedy for shaking her hand
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 10:34 AM by Gloria
or just angry at Clinton for reaching out.

He really is like a teenager sometimes....That picture in the other story thread is really something....dare I say "a pout?"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Wow..that might be it..
"Hey ted..you're supposed to be with ME"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Sullen
that's a good description. He often looks sullen and arrogant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Yes, the word SULLEN is exactly the right description for his face
when he's angry. It's not very appealing, is it?? SNIDE is another good word. He was snide when he made the "likability" remark at the debate...

For him to be this pouty over Kennedy's handshake (forget Clinton, it's Kennedy he's steamed over) then make nice with Bush shows what he is is...not for me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Uppity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. Another DUer with the amazing ability to psychoanalyze from photos.
Maybe you and Bill Frist can go into a partnership diagnosing people from a distance. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. It seems like it is not Clinton making a big deal out of this at all.
I have seen numerous articles in the media this morning that say Obama snubbed Clinton and it looked bad. In any case, it was really bad for the party. What is Kennedy going to do if she becomes the President? He should have just stayed out of it or kept the endorsement more low key like everyone else has. I have yet to see any of the other people who have endorsed a candidate get an entire day of media coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. Hillaryworld is being absolutely dishonest about this STUPID handshake bullshit
I don't expect anything less than inane half-witted arguments from the Hillaryworld camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. So, I guess Kennedy is too, since he reached toward her, too?
It's called politics. Sort of like when Obama panders to Repubicans, in the same way.

Note: I am NOT a Hillary supporter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. Buddy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. you mixed up the NOW statements
Kennedy was betraying all women by not sponsoring Hillary. This was two weeks after her opponents and the male press "gangbanged" her in New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. Look if this is all they got
they got nothing. And when you support Hillary excuse me, Billary, nothing is exactly what you'll get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm 100% for HRC
but I'm not going to get all tied up on if it was or was not a snubbed hand shake. What that bastard Bush said at the State of The Union got me more mad then the idea of a snub. If Obama said he didn't snub her, then fine. HRC is tough to survive it even if it was. I don't see any point to wasting on time of a hand shake, there's so much more to be concerned with. This topic is just going to widen the divide between the Clinton and Obama people, and I don't see how that is productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC