Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Claire McCaskill being considered for Obama's VP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:36 PM
Original message
Is Claire McCaskill being considered for Obama's VP?
I know they have a good relationship, especially since they are from neighboring states, but they seem to pal around quite a bit.
Anyone know if she is on "the list"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. doubt it
apparently she became involved because she was watching sen obama on teevee and was crying because she thought it was so powerful and her daughter told her she had to get involved in his campaign. but they obviously like each other. i think she'd be a terrible choice though. too conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm guessing not a sitting Senator... especially from a purple state
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM by featherman
This also eliminates Webb IMO

I think Gen Clark would be a good choice or Bill Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt shed be on the list
She is a very good supporter however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't see any Democratic VP choice that would put the Senate in jeopardy
And Missouri has a Republican governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ghastly choice. Balance is what's sought, generally. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would guess that she is not
It will be interesting who watch who he will consider if he is the nominee.

Conventional wisdom would dictate that he pick someone who is more experienced than he is in foreign/defense matters. Also, normally, a senator would not take another Senator, so a Governor would be more likely, but since Obama is basically running as a Washington "outsider", that may not apply.

I would think Biden would be a good prospect, but he doesn't bring anything to the table, electorally. Richardson will probably be on the short list, particularly if Obama feels that after the primaries, he needs to mend fences with the Hispanic community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lots of Names Will be Bounced Around
You will hear many many names bounced around. That does two things: a) it serves as a compliment to many supporters, including some who are not really being considered, and b) it serves as a trial balloon to find initial public reaction.

I hope the VP will be Richardson. Obama needs someone will tons of experience to offset that line of attack. Also, the southwest is a swing area and it would be nice to have a fluent Spanish speaker on the ticket.

I agree with the above comments that a Dem president will not pick a sitting member of congress whose seat could be easily lost to the Repubs. That also disqualifies many sitting members of congress from serving in the cabinet. At one point, King George tried to get Lieberman to take a place on his cabinet, so that the GOP governor at the time could appoint a GOP replacement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. McCaskill is a blue dog Dem, her husband is a wealthy GOP'er
in working her way up the ladder of Missouri politics, she also had a very divisive style, bashing Democrats and praising Republicans. Given that, she and Obama may be a good match, though I wouldn't vote for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Those are some of the reasons I think they make a good pair.
But she is a tough campaigner and certainly has her charms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think Janet Napolitano is far more likely...
McCaskill just gained us what should've been Mel Carnahan's set in the Senate. I don't really want to open that up to another Republican any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Obama/Napolitano?
sounds like an Italian dish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, they sure do like to shake hands
so anything goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's moot. He's not going to win the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good God let's hope not
I'm having a hard enough time talking myself into voting for him if he gets the nod--I can't stand a Republican-lite like her on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why on earth would she be considered? Two freshmen Senators on the ticket?
What does she bring besides female organs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Age. A purple state. She is a fierce attack dog.
I agree there are alot of drawbacks... but she does have her strengths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Is there a Republican Governor in MO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Well thats enough reason to write her off IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Based on what--a year in the Senate?
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:29 PM by wienerdoggie
edit to add: a year in which she often capitulated to Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Based on her senatorial campaign. Bush or Cheney were in MO about a dozen times to campaign
for Talent. She fought a hard campaign...her appearances on TV etc.

I do not think she has lived up to many of her promises - but while on the campaign trail she was TOUGH and convincing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. There are many attack dogs out there that *wouldn't* give the Republicans a free Senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. True. But McCaskill has a charm about her. She can be very fierce, but like a kind
grandmother type at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. There's really no special benefit she could provide, and a huge downside.
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:40 PM by Occam Bandage
It's obvious the Democrats won't surrender a Senate seat four years from reelection just for a VP bid--especially with a potential VP that brings nothing special to the table. Why are you pushing this so heavily?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I was simply asking a question. And then explaining why I thought she may be
.... sorry if it offends you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. That would be a terrible choice. No geographic balance, no experience balance,
not much of anything to benefit his ticket--not to mention jeopardizing control of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. Don't the noms usually pick the VP based on the amount of votes s/he can bring? nt
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM by gateley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. And to balance out the ticket. I dont see how McCaskill would add anything.
She's a woman. Thats all I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. I believe he very well could pick a woman. However, I think Govs Napolitano or Sebelius are higher
on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I think Sebelius didn't do her bid any favors last night. Weak speech; if that's the strongest
she's willing to get on the attack, she isn't cut out for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC