jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:36 PM
Original message |
Is Claire McCaskill being considered for Obama's VP? |
|
I know they have a good relationship, especially since they are from neighboring states, but they seem to pal around quite a bit. Anyone know if she is on "the list"?
|
tishaLA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
apparently she became involved because she was watching sen obama on teevee and was crying because she thought it was so powerful and her daughter told her she had to get involved in his campaign. but they obviously like each other. i think she'd be a terrible choice though. too conservative.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm guessing not a sitting Senator... especially from a purple state |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM by featherman
This also eliminates Webb IMO
I think Gen Clark would be a good choice or Bill Richardson
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I doubt shed be on the list |
|
She is a very good supporter however.
|
Bok_Tukalo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't see any Democratic VP choice that would put the Senate in jeopardy |
|
And Missouri has a Republican governor.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ghastly choice. Balance is what's sought, generally. NT |
NWHarkness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I would guess that she is not |
|
It will be interesting who watch who he will consider if he is the nominee.
Conventional wisdom would dictate that he pick someone who is more experienced than he is in foreign/defense matters. Also, normally, a senator would not take another Senator, so a Governor would be more likely, but since Obama is basically running as a Washington "outsider", that may not apply.
I would think Biden would be a good prospect, but he doesn't bring anything to the table, electorally. Richardson will probably be on the short list, particularly if Obama feels that after the primaries, he needs to mend fences with the Hispanic community.
|
JPZenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Lots of Names Will be Bounced Around |
|
You will hear many many names bounced around. That does two things: a) it serves as a compliment to many supporters, including some who are not really being considered, and b) it serves as a trial balloon to find initial public reaction.
I hope the VP will be Richardson. Obama needs someone will tons of experience to offset that line of attack. Also, the southwest is a swing area and it would be nice to have a fluent Spanish speaker on the ticket.
I agree with the above comments that a Dem president will not pick a sitting member of congress whose seat could be easily lost to the Repubs. That also disqualifies many sitting members of congress from serving in the cabinet. At one point, King George tried to get Lieberman to take a place on his cabinet, so that the GOP governor at the time could appoint a GOP replacement.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
8. McCaskill is a blue dog Dem, her husband is a wealthy GOP'er |
|
in working her way up the ladder of Missouri politics, she also had a very divisive style, bashing Democrats and praising Republicans. Given that, she and Obama may be a good match, though I wouldn't vote for them.
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
21. Those are some of the reasons I think they make a good pair. |
|
But she is a tough campaigner and certainly has her charms.
|
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I think Janet Napolitano is far more likely... |
|
McCaskill just gained us what should've been Mel Carnahan's set in the Senate. I don't really want to open that up to another Republican any time soon.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
sounds like an Italian dish
|
Tarc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Well, they sure do like to shake hands |
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's moot. He's not going to win the nomination. |
Bluestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Good God let's hope not |
|
I'm having a hard enough time talking myself into voting for him if he gets the nod--I can't stand a Republican-lite like her on the ticket.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Why on earth would she be considered? Two freshmen Senators on the ticket? |
|
What does she bring besides female organs?
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Age. A purple state. She is a fierce attack dog. |
|
I agree there are alot of drawbacks... but she does have her strengths.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Is there a Republican Governor in MO? |
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Well thats enough reason to write her off IMO |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Based on what--a year in the Senate? |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:29 PM by wienerdoggie
edit to add: a year in which she often capitulated to Republicans?
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Based on her senatorial campaign. Bush or Cheney were in MO about a dozen times to campaign |
|
for Talent. She fought a hard campaign...her appearances on TV etc.
I do not think she has lived up to many of her promises - but while on the campaign trail she was TOUGH and convincing.
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
24. There are many attack dogs out there that *wouldn't* give the Republicans a free Senate seat. |
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. True. But McCaskill has a charm about her. She can be very fierce, but like a kind |
|
grandmother type at the same time.
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. There's really no special benefit she could provide, and a huge downside. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:40 PM by Occam Bandage
It's obvious the Democrats won't surrender a Senate seat four years from reelection just for a VP bid--especially with a potential VP that brings nothing special to the table. Why are you pushing this so heavily?
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. I was simply asking a question. And then explaining why I thought she may be |
|
.... sorry if it offends you.
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
19. That would be a terrible choice. No geographic balance, no experience balance, |
|
not much of anything to benefit his ticket--not to mention jeopardizing control of the Senate.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Don't the noms usually pick the VP based on the amount of votes s/he can bring? nt |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM by gateley
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. And to balance out the ticket. I dont see how McCaskill would add anything. |
|
She's a woman. Thats all I can think of.
|
beyurslf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
25. I believe he very well could pick a woman. However, I think Govs Napolitano or Sebelius are higher |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. I think Sebelius didn't do her bid any favors last night. Weak speech; if that's the strongest |
|
she's willing to get on the attack, she isn't cut out for VP.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message |