Interesting Analysis Of Candidate Oratory Skills

[THUNDER HANDS]

We construct and analyze a database consisting of the words used in speeches made by the candidates in the 2008 Democratic and Republican Presidential Primary.

We present findings in two key areas. First, we estimate which candidates are more negative by counting the number of times they mention their opponents by name.

Both Obama and Clinton are among the least negative.
John Edwards is 3.7 times more negative than Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is 4.7 times more negative than Obama.

We also compare the speeches of the candidates to speeches delivered by famous political figures and orators such as Martin Luther King, Ronald Reagan, and John F. Kennedy.

For example, we can ask whether a candidate's words are more like those of MLK versus Ronald Reagan. Using our metric, John McCain and Mitt Romney are the most like Ronald Reagan whereas (within the set of primary candidates) the words of Mike Huckabee and Barack Obama are the closest to those of Martin Luther King. Hillary Clinton is by far the candidate closest in oratory to Bill Clinton.

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~bsacerdo/Campaigning%20In%20Poetry..Sacerdote%20Zidar%201.27.08.pdf

It's a PDF file, btw.

[jackson_dem]

1. Cool stuff