Story in New York Times by DON VAN NATTA who writes Clinton hating books

[Proud2BAmurkin]

Notorious Clinton hater

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Van_Natta,_Jr.

With his former colleague at the Times, Jeff Gerth, Van Natta has written an investigative biography about Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton entitled, Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton. It was published in June 2007 by Little, Brown and Company.

[ursi]

1. good! we need all the dirt on the table soon on all of them

or the Repugs will give us all a laxative in the fall.

[ncabot22]

2. That's rich

You show outrage over this when you post bullshit time and time again about Obama. So, should we not take anything you say seriously since you are an Obama hater? Just asking.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

3. No don't take my word. Read the link and google his name.

[DJ13]

4. Whine whine whine

The Clintons have a long history of questionable financial deals.

Deal with it.

[KennedyGuy]

5. more right wing embracing by the Obama camp

[Seen the light]

6. Deleted

delete

[alcibiades_mystery]

7. I'll see your Chicago slum lord and raise you one Kazakhstani dictator

HIGH FIVE!

:rofl:

[NYCGirl]

8. Well, I see where he won two Pulitzers NT

[KittyWampus]

9. Amazon editor review and reader reviewers call it very fair.

The profile in ambition is rich in anecdote, spending far more time on Clinton's Senate career than Carl Bernstein's bio. Far from a conservative hit job, their reportage tends to focus on public reaction to Clinton rather than to her politics, with the notable exception of her 2002 vote to support George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq, including her vocal support of the theory that Saddam Hussein supported Al Qaeda, and her subsequent attempts to reinvent herself as an anti-war presidential candidate without refuting her previous position. The analysis of the early stages of her presidential campaign is somewhat hurried by necessity, but effectively supplements the balanced character study. Though they face stiff competition, Gertz and Van Natta's version of events is poised to gain traction.

[papau]

14. others do not call it fair - indeed it was called a smear/bash when first released - but

it is the spin and interpretation and the guessing at motive that is in question - they get dates and quotes correct.

[Marie26]

10. Looks like a respectable journalist

One book does not a Clinton-hater make.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

12. Long time Clinton despiser. google is your friend

[Marie26]

13. No, Google is YOUR friend.

If you're gonna post smears, you need to have the info to back it up.

[ruggerson]

11. I wouldn't worry about it, the story is a non story