Onlooker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 08:28 AM
Original message |
Poll question: What's the best job for Edwards in terms of how he can best serve the country? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 08:28 AM by Onlooker
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
Demeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
But since we seem to have been shut out of that option....
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I believe John Edwards would be a great Supreme Court Justice. He appears very healthy and would sit for 30-40 years. His heart is right on the key issues, and he has a thorough understanding of the legal issues which face the country. Big Business did a hatchet job on John, and I'm sure they are glad he will not be the nominee. He could end up with the VP spot, but as such, would not be nearly as important in the long run to the causes he has proudly represented.
Put John Edwards on the Supreme Court and you'll put a bug up the ass of every corporatist in the country for the next quarter century.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Agree. For the most long-term good, I'd like to see him among the Supremes. |
zeemike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Didn't even have to think about it AG |
|
At least that is what would be best for us if we are to actually have change. We know he is good in the legal matters.
|
cobalt1999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes, and he'd immediately restore the public's confidence in the Justice Dept. |
|
It would be a good move for him with his legal background.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |