MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:28 PM
Original message |
Do you think CNN will stoop so low as to ask the candidates about "The Snub?" |
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It will be mentioned. Not sure why you consider it low though. |
canadianbeaver
(929 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. I would say its low as well...... |
|
about as low as talking about the hill shrill......these non-issues do not matter....if its asked ..its asked to be divisive...plain and simple...imho...
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. Maybe we can get a definitive answer on what happened. |
|
Maybe they will both laugh it off and the issue can finally die.
|
canadianbeaver
(929 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. that would be nice.....I sure wish it would die.....along with the other |
|
Non issue revelations of late.
I freakin hate the media....no good fuggers.
|
anamandujano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
17. I'd advise Obama and Clinton to hug each other as soon as they |
|
hit the stage and when they are asked repeatedly about it say, "it's over, let's move on."
Someone can also mention that they watched the Repuke debate (using the more civil term) and were delighted how well it stayed on issue.
(Of course Hillary might want to use Obama's arrogance against him, not saying anything but allowing him to continue melting himself down. Shame on her :evilgrin: but it's for the good of the country. imho)
|
alstephenson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message |
indie_voter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You bet they will. n/t |
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes I do................ |
|
Why........................I think the media pundits, they are so superficial, so high on marijuana that they can't articulate the serious issues.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message |
5. NOTHING is too low for CNN |
|
and it serves the Dems right for allowing them and their inane commentators to host the debates.
|
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
22. Not even the volume function at zero. |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
7. You betcha. Obama will be allowed to explain how we didn't see what we saw. |
|
And his supporters will enthusiastically accept his explanation.
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Of course.....they are as low was we are. |
|
We used to be better, but not anymore.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It IS the whore media we're talking about.
|
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
12. If Obama hadn't snubbed her, they wouldn't need to ask about it. nt |
anamandujano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
30. True. He handed them the ammo on a silver platter w parsley. |
|
To the people here who think they should both play into MSM hands, the Repukes and their right hand men would be happy if the whole debate were used up on this one topic. Try to argue against that one.
I was joking in my other post saying that Hillary should just let him have a meltdown.
Best idea is for them to keep shaking hands and patting each other on the back until Wolf or whoever has the honors has to say over and over "let's get started." They will have the audience in hysterics and bury the issue once and for all.
I do believe the big O will continue to put his real character on display (but at least they won't waste the last debate).
|
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
13. The only thing low about the incident is the way HRC is playing victim |
|
again. If she felt that was a snub, then her skin must not be as thick as she claims.
|
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I hope so- and I hope she comes clean, or is exposed for the player |
|
she is acting like.
Hillary is a very intelligent, powerful woman. If she can't win this election on her actual abilities, she should at least lose it honestly- not by using her sex to manipulate others.
I am a woman- I would be very happy to have a woman president. But not because she's a woman- because she'd be the best person for the job.
And given what Hillary is doing- and has done, she is not the best person for this job. That is quite obvious.
IMO
peace~
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
16. MSM is all about getting a headline. They don't care about substance, |
|
just fluff. If they can get Hillary to go berserk or Obama to swear under his breath, they've done their job.
|
my3boyz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
so he can explain what happened. I hope he mentions how there are pictures out there in a series that prove he did not snub her. Then Chris Matthews will have to shut the hell up about the snub. Oh and then I would like them to ask Hillary so she can look Obama in the eyes and tell that lie.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I hope they ask about how Hill was desperate for Obamas handshake and approval. But I bet they don't |
|
On the other hand they might.
The non-hand-shake non-story will be the first question asked.
|
beachmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
19. It would behoove the candidates to beat them to it, and bury the hatchett. |
|
Obama first, hopefully.
Gosh, it reminds me of When Harry Met Sally (except the opposite situation: the guy should speak up on this first).
Please let Obama make the first move on this!!!
LOL.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Media loves dish and this is juicy dish to them |
|
No brainer - certainly works for Obama if asked, easily and pleasantly explained away
|
DUyellow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
23. 100% yes. wolf will ask it |
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Are you kidding? They'll lead with it. |
|
Mainstream Media is all about the 8th grade lunch room gossip approach to debate.
Did you hear what he/she said about him/her?!! Tabloid nonsense.
I've seen the entire set of photos, and in my view, Clinton never made eye contact with Obama, and never extended her hand to him. She extended a hand to Kennedy. It's the kind of thing that causes Democrats with legitimate concerns about issues to wince at the way the Clinton team approaches making points. It's such a transparent attempt to try to paint Obama in an unflattering light.
Hillary needs to ditch all these things that scream out "victim" and run like someone who could be president. If she is the nominee, she's no good to us if she gets there by appealing to sympathy instead of substance. Any time she runs on ruffled feathers, she diminishes her chances of winning the presidency. That isn't going to sell in November. It might get some quick, short term success in selected primaries, but it comes at a real and lingering cost.
|
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Hope so. Why would it be low of them? |
Hoof Hearted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Of course they will. Obama should welcome the opportunity, if he gets testy or defensive |
|
it'll just kind of prove that whole smoke and fire thing.
If he is gracious and mature about it, I'll be impressed.
|
thoughtcrime1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Of course! The MSM is petty, childish, and Republican... |
|
Any chance to show a "major rift" in the party will be exploited.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Of course, they will. |
|
I'll be totally shocked if they don't.
|
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Then they will ask each candidate what they think of Brittney Spears' recent behavior and how he or she would address that as president.
Finally, they will want to know whether the candidates will create a special DHS response team to focus on locating missing blond girls.
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Yes! Especially if Wolf is involved |
Hieronymus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |