Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dennis Kucinich, the only real anti-war candidate on funding the war...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:19 PM
Original message
Dennis Kucinich, the only real anti-war candidate on funding the war...
"I think it's inconsistent to tell the American people that you oppose the war and, yet, you continue to vote to fund the war. Because every time you vote to fund the war, you're reauthorizing the war all over again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. the progressive is out, the populist is out. Dennis would've investigated repub crimes
if he was elected.

ObamaHillary are complicit and they are not likely to do so.

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sybbis Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, but we're living in the real world...
And in the real world, Clinton or Obama are both preferable to any Republican nominee. Funding the war isn't the same thing as creating it, no matter how you try to shape it. That distinction goes to George W. Bush and his merry band of monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm just commenting on the Obama claim that he was always against the war. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sybbis Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ah. Sorry...
I just hate it when people go on and on about how it's just as bad to fund the war as it was to start it. I also hate it when folks rant about how voting for the IWR was just as bad as creating the war in the first place. I don't see either as accurate or useful in the current election season.

You, obviously, were doing neither of those things. I'm sorry that my reply jumped on your head.

p.s.
I'll be seeing the lovely and talented Hillary Clinton in LA tomorrow morning - for the first time since.. EVER! (I saw Bill a couple of times in the 90's.) I'm pretty jazzed about seeing her this close to when I will actually get to vote for her.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He said
"re-authorizing." Plenty of Dems and Repubs alike fall into that category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sybbis Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes they do, and it's still not the same...
At least it isn't to me. This is George Bush's war and there isn't a rationale anyone can put forward that will make me believe anything else. Whatever minor role others have in funding the troops is, frankly, negligible in my opinion. Every death is George Bush's responsibility. Every maiming and injury is George Bush's responsibility. Every young Muslim who is learning to hate America even as we argue these points is George Bush's responsibility.

I blame him for every bit of it. That's my opinion and you are more than welcome to your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Slice it anyway you like but
only a few stood up and sent up a resounding "No!" when the IWR was presented. Many cowards looked the other way and went along...many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. correct; obama is no different than clinton on the war. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mike Gravel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recommend. And I wish that they'd stop saying war and start calling it what it is: an invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sybbis Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Agreed. And the "surge" is an ESCALATION n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. So I guess we should make sure the troops in harm's way have jackshit to protect themselves
What Dennis was saying with his statements:

"Likewise, fuck them if they come home with missing limbs and shit. We ain't payin' no stinkin' money to support the troops whe they are in harm's way.

Yunno why? Because we are into political theater and not really interested in the troops anyway."

Are people serious that once the troops were in harm's way, we should pull the rug from under them and leave them for dead? I have yet to see any logical REALISTIC reason where not funding the troops (and vets) would actually be a "good thing".





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. That's not what he is
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 09:19 AM by hippywife
saying at all. The power of the purse is meant to stop the invasion and bring the troops home, not strand them in harm's way. And Dennis would never, ever defund the vets. A more compassionate soul has hardly ever existed in the seats of power in this nation.

If you think this man is in it for "theater," then you don't know the first thing about him. If he makes a statement, he also has a plan and has researched what is needed to back it up and make it succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. Candidate for what? The 10th in Ohio? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. Um... he's not a Candidate (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC