Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 11:42 AM
Original message |
In presidential elections the opposite of "anti-war" (Obama) is "patriotic" |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 11:45 AM by Proud2BAmurkin
Obama is perfectly positioned to lose a general election. Take it to the bank.
ALL "anti war" candidates lose presidential elections because the opposite of "anti war" in all presidential elections isn't "pro war", it's "patriotic."
Clinton smartly avoided the anti war label so in her case it would be "patriot" (Clinton) versus "pro war" (100 years McCain)
Obama = McGovern. He will be destroyed on national security.
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. So you're saying Clinton is pro-war, right? |
|
OK, finally we agree on something.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |