Hey Hill, if you knew "then," what you know "now" about Fox ...

[themaguffin]

would you still want to have a "debate" on the undisputed propaganda arm of the right wing...?

[Iwasthere]

1. Good one

She is desperate now, grasping

[DJ13]

2. It depends on the definition of "then"

:think:

[busymom]

3. Obama went on Faux news too...

I guess you'll have to vote for Nader.

[themaguffin]

4. debate?

[rinsd]

7. Does that make a difference?

If the point is to not legitamize FoxNews, why go on at all?

[themaguffin]

11. Yes, a very big one

[rinsd]

15. How is it a big difference?

[rinsd]

5. Apparently its ok to go on FoxNews if your name is Obama.

[themaguffin]

6. what debate?

[11 Bravo]

12. Read slowly and carefully, move your lips if you must.

The post to which you are responding made no mention of a "debate". It simply is pointing out the sheer hypocrisy of chastising Hilary Clinton for appearing on Fox (and I wish she would not) when Barack Obama has done the same thing.

[themaguffin]

14. You should pay attention

Obviously my comment was related to the debate. Sorry that I was not clear enough for the uninformed.

[busymom]

8. It's OK to go on Faux news and try and drum up support

from the viewers of that "right wing" organization...just not...debate on the channel.

Obama alone appealing to his base...yeeha.
Clinton and Obama debating each other? Bad, bad, Clinton...

[themaguffin]

10. Going on and saying what you want is one thing, setting up wingnut theater is another

Seriously how naive are you?

[Bluebear]

9. You've used up your allotment of quotation marks until April, just so you know

[themaguffin]

13. it's hard to refrain when describing that "network" oh, there I go again...