|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:15 PM Original message |
BREAKING: Most Recent Delegate Count from MSNBC: Obama 838 Clinton 834 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:16 PM Original message |
GOBAMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mutant80 (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
24. What about FLA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. What about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
57. Florida & Mich. don't count - she would be ahead by more than 100 if they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. If they want the state to count - you RE DO the vote there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D23MIURG23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #57 |
75. This Michiganian will be pissed if HRC wins because MI gets a say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
73. The number is inaccurate...doesn't reflect NM or Super delegates in ND.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Is that correct?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. MSNBC is runnign with this story as of now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Wow - this is great news! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
72. Really ------GREAT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Yes, It IS correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. GOBAMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm sick to hell of close elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's all over the news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. Obama must reach the hispanic vote and the poor vote n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. The Obama haters must be crying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. ? That's hardly a conclusive result compared to the wild predictions of a 20-state Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Nobody predicted that...we said he needed to not lose by more than 100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
55. I saw a prediction by Perky and other Obama supporters agreed with him that Obama could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Who predicted such thing? I remember predicting a Hillary win in California! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
53. I can name one by name: Perky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. It's funny you mentioned that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
51. Quick, has anyone seen my revisionist pen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. One of Obama's most visible supporters, Perky, predicted exactly what I mentioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
69. Was that on MSNBC or CNN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
78. Oh yes, the "haters" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. oof, that is close, and it's not over yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. Obama winning by every measure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. only when superdelegates are left out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. That includes the superdelegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mutant80 (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. that shows you don't know your candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. Don't post Krugman - NYT shit to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
68. Ahh yes.. here we go again. Obama - the "Far Right" candidate with the most liberal senate record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VarnettaTuckpocket (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
76. Radioactive tap water, love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Do you really believe that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mutant80 (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. were you alive during the Clinton era? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
61. I am in my 40s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. His Record Shows Me That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
62. Thank you -- going off to read that now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. Where did MSNBC get the numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. from CNN lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
15. Still 411 Undeclared Super-Delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. You have to wonder if many of these super delegates will stick with Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mutant80 (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. That would make a great poster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
17. Wooo Hooo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
19. Such an exciting race and an exciting time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Viva Obama! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
25. Obama is in the lead for good. He should not lose it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. I think you are right. The next contests are his (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
26. CBS still has Clintion at 970pts, Obama 904pts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Those probably include super delegates. Obama should close that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. It's a real horserace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
27. CNN and CBS are NOT showing these numbers. Have Hillary up by about 100. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demokatgurrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
28. Isn't BREAKING NEWS supposed to be true? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. They are, try watching MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Viva Obama! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
31. That is 41% of the total delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
39. I think that does not include Superdelegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. It doesnt. She will be leading after superdelegates are counted for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. I didn't realize there were that many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. MSM leaving out the SDs because it does not fit their narrative... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Actually the super delegates can change their vote and many probably will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
58. They leave out SD's because they are not pledged to any one candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickn777 (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
77. Correct.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
47. The number Hnmnf posted is a combination of the delegates won yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. The competition for elected delegates is more important at this point, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jzodda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
49. Wow! Its starting to get more probable that neither will get the 2000+ needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
50. Didn't Hillary start with a 150+ delegate lead before even the first primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
56. Help me understand why MSNBC's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. This doesn't include superdelegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. But it does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Yesterday's numbers haven't been fully tabulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. So.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. CNN hasn't finished tabulating delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
60. Those numbers DO NOT include super delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #60 |
71. *chuckle* Hillary's superdelegate numbers may not hold steady for long n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
65. YAY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC