rndmprsn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:49 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Who WON Super Tuesday...24 Hours Later |
|
who do you think won super tuesday, now that we've had a day to digest it all, based on;
momentum delegates states fund raising soon to come endorsements? media spin co-workers family etc....
and most importantly...why?
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Obama did. He got more delegates and more states. Face it.. |
|
if Hillary had gotten more states but fewer delagates she would be claiming a victory like in NV. As it happens Barack won both. :)
|
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Obama was supposed to be stalled, if not stopped, by Super Tuesday |
|
He answered the media's question "Is America Ready For a Black President?" with a such a vengeance that he's raised another two million dollars! Investing in his momentum isn't a pipe dream anymore, which means much bigger returns on his political "capital."
:headbang: rocknation
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not two million, 4 MILLION!!! |
DUyellow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not two million, Not 4 million, 7,596,326!!!!!!!!!! |
rndmprsn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
7. No contest. The truth wins in the end. |
Abacus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It seems the media has been riding him a lot harder since Super Tuesday -- welcome to front-runner status, Barack.
|
Exultant Democracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The inevitable candidate was brought to a stand still, we find out she is broke, |
|
and it looks like she is going to try and pull a "Double Rudy" and wait for Texas and Ohio to come to her.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Obama!! More states, more votes, more delegates, more $$$ |
|
The Good Ship Lollipop is taking water.
|
milkyway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Where did the army of Hillary supporters go? Did some checks bounce? |
oviedodem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Republicans won because their party is unified now and they will |
|
now have months to rally their base against the dems in general.
S**t.
|
Alter Ego
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Obama won, because he met his expectations |
|
and exceeded them to a slight degree.
Everyone's forgetting--thinking he would win overwhelmingly was quite a stretch...Clinton had leads in Cali, MA, and NY (duh) going into it, and those were the three largest delegate prizes, really. What he had to do was keep it close--he stole a few small states out from under her, picked up some surprising popular vote wins (Missouri?), and managed to keep the gap in those aforementioned states respectable while snatching up a bevy of Southern and Midwestern states that he needed to win and win big.
He did all that. when you're the underdog in politics, you don't need to win.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Obama only needed to do OK. Clinton needed to SWEEP. Because going in to next round |
|
of states is smoother waters for Obama.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |