Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Show of hands: How many here knew Hillary won New Mexico?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:13 AM
Original message
Show of hands: How many here knew Hillary won New Mexico?
I ask this because of the answers on tis thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4432019&mesg_id=4432019
and also as proof of media bias (how many here know that New Hampshire reconts yielded MORE votes for Hillary, not less)
here's the pressty picture - complete with the interesting color scheme (isn't red customarily accompanied by MSM swoons?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. She did??
I honestly didn't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Still 1% of votes to be counted but she is ahead right now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought it hadn't yet been determined
as I asked in a different thread and was told they are still counting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. I also heard that the tallies aren't final yet
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 11:16 AM by Happyhippychick
Here is the link that I have used which shows that it isn't final:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. I didn't know the count was finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can you show me any link tht backs up what you're saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. They're still counting
but Clinton's up by more than 1,000 votes.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. They Will Be Counting Until Next Christmas To Deprive Hillary Of A Good Healine...
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 11:25 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
I kid... I kid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Ho joke. In 2004 CNN refused to post Clark's Oklahoma win on their site ("too close"
was the rule they just made up). Thay had managed to keep this win under wraps long enough to kick him out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. photo came from here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. At the time of those posts, Obama was ahead....
And, to my knowledge, it still hasn't been called. Though, I'd be surprised if Hillary didn't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have to admit--i did not know--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. that is because the OP is wrong, nobody has one it yet....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. True, but with only 1% remaining, Obama would have to get almost all of the remaining votes
It seems unlikely, but not entirely impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hillary leads by a few hundred, but 16,870 provisional ballots remain to be tallied this a.m.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Now that you mention it, New Mexico had a helluva
time counting ballots from the 2000 Presidential Election, too. Only their ballot problems was overshadowed by the huge crapfest of an election in Flori-Duh!

Eight years later and New Mexico is still having problems.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Do you know what the problem was? is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Both parties wanted their people at the counts--see my post below for link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Clinton holds a lead of 1,092 votes over Barack Obama.":
ALBUQUERQUE (AP) - Democrats are preparing to examine about 17,000 provisional ballots that will determine a winner in New Mexico’s tightly contested presidential caucus.

Party officials say the process will begin Thursday but they can’t say how long verifying the provisional ballots will take.

They say the process was delayed Tuesday when campaign officials asked them to wait so that their representatives could attend the review.

New Mexico is the last of 22 states that held Democratic primaries and caucuses Tuesday to report a winner.

With 183 of 184 of precincts reporting, Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a lead of 1,092 votes over Barack Obama.

When the provisional count is done, it may mean only a



http://kob.com/article/stories/S339347.shtml?cat=500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. says the counting just started today--see here:

Party officials say the process will begin Thursday but they can’t say how long verifying the provisional ballots will take.

They say the process was delayed Tuesday when campaign officials asked them to wait so that their representatives could attend the review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Show of hands: How many know the OP is wrong?
The article that you take this image from at krqe.com clearly states that nearly 17,000 provisional ballots won't be counted until Thursday (that's today). Hillary's margin of 1,092 is significant but not insurmountable given the number and uncertainty of provisional ballots. Of course, I am addressing the popular vote as the OP did.

http://www.krqe.com/global/story.asp?s=7830446

That gave Sen. Hillary Clinton a statewide lead of 1,092 votes over Sen. Barack Obama.

But that's obviously far from final since nearly 17,000 provisional ballots have not been tallied. Those are ballots used by voters who had registration problems at polling places and may or may not be entitled to vote.

Those were expected to be counted today, but now that won't happen until Thursday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Nice to she has a significant Lead--GO HILLARY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I knew the OP was wrong!
Because I actually read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. So you're saying robbedvoter can write the English language but not read it.
You never miss a chance to smack someone around. How clever you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Um no, because I do my own reading...
...and already knew it to be false.

Good try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. actually, robbed is very smart.....
she just happens to be wrong to support the very crew of people who sabotaged 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections for Democratic voters and candidates.


http://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=13354
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. It was trending to Clinton.
And will continue to trend Clinton. Law of averages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Really ??? I'll have to start listening to the BBC & CBC again /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
21. to deconstruct it even further
Hillary is clearly on the "red" side, while Barack is clearly in the blue. His back is turned to her, perhaps signaling that her rejects her, or maybe just rejects conservatism (red). Very interesting, and maybe unintended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JKaiser Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. I hope she pulls through!:)
It is an interesting color scheme... It makes obama stand out more... Once again proof that the republicans want Obama to win to loose in the general election..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton won Arizona easily even with the papers working to get Obama to win our state.
They were posting polls on how he was within a few points of her just days prior to the vote.

Many here will claim that the fix was in if she wins New Mexico, but if Obama wins it will all be about "momentum"

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Bill did the super-bowl with Richardson obviously for a reason, now
Richardson will expect to be called in for the VP slot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. I didn't !!! NPR stated yesterday that Obama had it by a small margin.
Just goes to show you that once tuesday was over, the follow up on the delegate counts went down the drain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Significant problems in the New Mexico Tally
That should be explored and straightened out so that whatever is happening over there wont happen for the general. The exit polls showed that Hillary and Obama split the women's vote and that Obama won the mens vote by a significant margin. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#NM

If you look at the exit polls, you would expect an Obama victory of about 5%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hill08 Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. I am happy she won NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adapa Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. as of 9:50 am on 2.7.06, Hillary is 1,123 votes ahead of Obama, with 17,000 provisional ballots yet
to be looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. How many know Carville sabotaged Ohio voters? Now THAT is media bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
37. No--she's ahead by approximately 1,000 votes but they
just started counting the 17,000 provisional ballots this morning, and that's a chore that could--and probably will--take days, given all the cross-checking they have to do.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. If she did congratulations. Very close--Obama made up a lot of points in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
40. Show of hands: How many people knew Clintonites were claiming victories they haven't won yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Since she's been ahead ever since the polls closed on Tuesday,
and since most people outside of New Mexico don't know that we're still counting provisional ballots, I'd say only a
loser and a sorehead would attempt to frame the situation the way you just did.

Typical, typical, typical...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. You do know there's 17,000 provisional ballots, right?
Sure you did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. How long does it take to count 17,000 ballots? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Ask them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. They're doing an official recount of ALL ballots
Could take days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Ah, I thought that was the case
Maybe someone should tell the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Provisional ballots? No kidding?
That must be why I mentioned them in both my previous posts.

Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doyourealize1 Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
48. I'm a Hillary supporter but
I think you're looking too far into the color scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
49. not yet, they are still counting
Hillary Rodham Clinton 68,654 48.8% 14
Barack Obama 67,531 48.0 12
John Edwards 2,060 1.5 0
Bill Richardson 1,211 0.9 0
Dennis J. Kucinich 511 0.4 0
Uncommitted 413 0.3 0
Joseph R. Biden Jr. 113 0.1 0
Christopher J. Dodd 70 0.0 0
99% reporting | Updated 5:51 PM ET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
50. I read on a NM TV sight they plan to recount the entire state.
I don't think there's a winner yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC