book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:19 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Who will be our strongest nominee vs. McCain--Obama or Clinton? |
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Obama. And it's closer to a fact than an opinion. Lots of data to back it up, I think. |
|
No, I don't have the links and I don't think Clinton fans even want to ask me for them, because I suspect it would soon become a deluge of statistics that overwhelmingly show that he is a better matchup.
|
Tarc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Would this be the same data that tried to hand California to Obama? |
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Agree. McCain vs. Clinton means that: |
|
1. Independent voters will trend largely towards McCain 2. Republicans will have something to vote for, or rather against in Hillary
1 + 2 = 3rd consecutive Republican presidential term.
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. oh please -- give us the *deluge of stats* |
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Better yet, I'll grab them and I'll start a thread on them. Please look for it. |
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. Shall I give you the link to the thread I started. The deluge is coming. |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They would both beat The Fossil. But Hillary would make it a closer contest. |
Red Zelda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Hillary could not win one red state |
|
Obama puts some in play, even MS. Hillary would lose ME, PA, NH, WI and maybe NM.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Do You Have Any Empirical Information To Support Your Assertion Or Did You Make It Up On The Fly? |
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. The entire Clinton career as well as their slavish devotion to a losing 50+1 Strategy |
|
no one has to make that up.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Bill Clinton Carried Nearly Forty States In 92 And 96...Try Again |
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. true, and I'm not saying that HRC couldn't win, but Clinton also had help in both cases by |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. I Have To Go To Lunch But If Perot Helped Bush Pere And Dole It Was Marginal |
|
I can't find the citation in such a short time..
|
Red Zelda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. So, it is Bill that's running |
Red Zelda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. Do you capitalize everything? |
|
Yeah, I guess Hillary would win every state. Whatsamatter with me anyway? Everybody loves Hillary. She has so much experience, like her last win in her home state of NY against ... oh, damn, I forgot.
|
Kokonoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
14. This poll should be limited to anyone over 62 |
|
and Dole supporters to get a grip on how important voters feel.
|
loveangelc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Obama. All the polls show it (even ones with him losing to hilllary) and rush limbuagh i hear |
|
is resorting to holding a fundraiser so that republicans can win in nov.
plus, republicans according to an analyst on nbc, may consider running a conservative party candidate if obama is the nominee (not if hillary is).
there's really no question obama would be a better choice imo.
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Either one can beat McAnus - but I think Obama will be a surer thing |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Obama. I think he's the better candidate. Better speaker, and he doesn't come into it |
|
with half the country already hating his guts.
Either one can win- I just think Hillary will have a tougher time of it.
|
BringBigDogBack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |