Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow, For Clinton to be BROKE means she SPENT over $40 MILLION in JAN!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:23 PM
Original message
Wow, For Clinton to be BROKE means she SPENT over $40 MILLION in JAN!!!!
I know the campaign should not be about how much money a candidate can raise, but watching how it is spent is very telling.

Check it out.



http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp?cycle=2008

As of end of Q4 last year, she had 37 million cash on hand and had nearly $5 million in debt. This doesn't factor in what she raised in Jan, so she's SPENT A TON OF MONEY just to keep pace with Obama.

Now she's loaning her campaign $5 million.

And that's just to stay in the race.

This does not look good for her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. HRC did it for super Tuesday and prevailed in CA. It was worth it
and I contributed again last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Prevailed? More like TIED with Obama.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. She won CA by 10 points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. LOL - so a win by 10 points - holding Obama to 42% - gives him a "tie"
Joe Biden (Dem) 15,463 0.3 %
Dennis Kucinich (Dem) 20,206 0.5 %
Barack Obama (Dem) 1,735,105 42.3 %
Bill Richardson (Dem) 16,960 0.5 %
Hillary Clinton (Dem) 2,132,166 52.0 %
Chris Dodd (Dem) 6,727 0.1 %
John Edwards (Dem) 170,013 4.2 %
Mike Gravel (Dem) 6,666 0.1 %
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. When she was polling 15-20 points higher than that just a week before, YEAH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Obama was up (RCP ave) 1.2% over Clinton in the polls - but she won by 10
Tuesday, February 5 | Delegates at Stake: 441
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Obama Clinton Spread
Final Results - - 42.3 51.9 Clinton +9.6


RCP Average 02/01 - 02/04 - 44.0 42.8 Obama +1.2
Reuters/CSpan/Zogby 02/03 - 02/04 895 LV 49 36 Obama +13.0
SurveyUSA 02/03 - 02/04 872 LV 42 52 Clinton +10.0
Suffolk 02/01 - 02/03 700 LV 40 39 Obama +1.0
Rasmussen 02/02 - 02/02 798 LV 45 44 Obama +1.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Take out the Bullshit Zogby poll and you have a more realistic result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. apparently she had no ground game in many states nor a plan for having to actually FIGHT f
for the nomination.

It took her THIS long to reach out to grassroots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I have little respect for grassroots. HRC has been working the
political establishment that gave us the new deal and the war on poverty.

And this is from someone who mobilized the 'nets for Pacifica radio and of course, election reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. Dont forget
"political establishment that gave us the new deal and the war on poverty. "

She also was part of the establishment that gave us the war on iraq, but it was popular then so I guess its ok..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. It's not OK, but it does put the decision in context. You can't be a
leader w/o followers, which constrains behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Wow how sick is that
'you cant be a leader without followers' sounds like Lemming logic and she did indeed jump off the cliff along with us foreign policy..

I want a leader who does not stick their finger up in the air to gauge the wind when looking for an opinion about war..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. A leader is sensitive to how far a team can be driven. That's life /t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. I was under the impression that there were other states in this country...
...and that many of them voted too.

Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama OUTSPENT her.
hello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And still has more cash on hand. Amazing isn't it?
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM by berni_mccoy
He was way behind and caught up with her while she struggled to stay even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. And still only got 42% in California
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Across America, the results were quite different:
TOTAL VOTES CAST
Clinton: 50.2% (7,347,971)
Obama: 49.8% (7,294,851)

4/10ths of 1% difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. He has offices all over the country
He was laying the grassroots groundwork for the entire campaign. Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. the cash on hand includes general election money, which I think she has a lot of compared to Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. "had" would be the correct verb here. She "had" a lot compared to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. no, general election money cannot be spent yet, she still has it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. No, "has"
She can't use the GE money for primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. She raised $13 mil in January -
do you really think she broke - or just crying broke to stimulate slow fundraising numbers?

I have a hard time wrapping my mind about Clinton spending herself broke with a protracted battle looming. Do you think her strategy was to put it away already?

Poor planning?

The Clintons.

They are too crafty.

What is your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's hard to say if she is being honest about it. If she isn't, she's going to piss off her base
I know I wouldn't be happy if a candidate I gave money lied to me about needing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. the Hallmark bit must have cost a pretty penny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Half a million dollars
not that much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. $500,000 - Obama spent $250,000 on theSuperBowl buy.
those two choices tell me so much.

It amazes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Bwahahahahaha! That's FUNNY! She spent 500,000 on something a very small number of people saw
While Obama got the biggest Super Bowl VIEWERSHIP IN HISTORY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. HRC bought something substantial. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. From what I can put together your wrong, she spent that primary money in Iowa
at the start of jan she was already in a situation where she had something like 13 million left that she could use in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Wow. Didn't I say JAN? Iowa was in JAN. Desperate GOMAMA Cultist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. She spent the money in Iowa before the Primary on Jan 3rd. Not 40 mil during Jan, 40 mil before Jan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. The expenses were accurate as of Dec 31 (end of Q4).
So your original statement is wrong. She had that much cash on hand coming into Jan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. She's
not broke. It's Clinton propoganda trying to garner sympathy.

But yeah if she is broke, she is fiscally irresponsible. Do we want someone that fiscally irresponsible running the country? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. If she's not broke, she's lying to her supporters. They ought to be PISSED.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 12:33 PM by berni_mccoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. We're not pissed
and we know she's not broke. She has to in the short term get her money to be competitive with Obama's money. Obama raised alot of money, hat's off to him. Clinton had to make a short term decision to close the gap with money. It's not that crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeforChange Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. This is sympathy game I think
Hillary was to build the grassroots support that Obama got. Part of this was through direct online donations from the little people. If Hillary can beg and plead that she is broke the little people who support her will do what Obama's did for him. This will build her network. Plus since she loaned her campaign money she can get the little people to pay back the loan in case she looses.

That's my take for what it's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. has anyone noticed
that Hillary is imitating whatever the Obama camp does. Obama started talking about change. That cuaght on, so then she started touting change and how she stood for change. People Obama has painstakingly built a grassroots fundraising machine, with a large presence on the internet. It works so Hillary starts trying to do it.

All her ideas are derivative. She's not a leader, but a follower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. No I haven't noticed that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. She's not broke
Obama raised alot of money - ALOT OF MONEY - She had to make some decision for short term action to quickly have her money be competitive with Obama's money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC