sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:55 PM
Original message |
The DNC should ask the people of Florida and Michigan if there vote should stand |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:58 PM by sunonmars
Why can't the DNC undertake a huge poll withing Florida and Michigan with the aid of 2 of the most neutral polling bodies.
Ask a random sample of 15'000 people in Florida and in Michigan, Do you think the results of the Michigan or Florida ballot should stand.
If it is a yes, then the vote should be honoured, if it is a no , then a revote applied.
Its a simple way to as certain if they feel that no campaigning affected a decision.
Could this not be a simpler way of them deciding.
Its their vote, let them decide!
|
ursi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. the voting process was flawed due to agreements beforehand, they should caucus |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. If you're going to do that, you should just let them re-vote. |
snooper2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
14. Yeah, kind of stupid... |
|
Let's organize and have everyone vote, to see if they can vote again..
Der der der...
|
sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. did i say vote, no, i said a large poll done. |
snooper2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
26. And just how would this large poll |
|
ensure everyone only voted once? You call everyone with land lines only? On the Internet, DU :)
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No they shouldn't, they should seat them and split the delegates evenly. n/t |
sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. like Hell Hillary took both states handsomely |
|
You cant just give away what people voted for.
|
Kittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. In an unfair and unbalanced race. |
|
44% of the people in Michigan turned out to vote AGAINST her as uncommited, knowing their vote wouldn't count. It's not even possible to estimate the number of voters in FL & MI that didn't even bother showing up. And she is a "known" candidate - Obama isn't. They both deserve the equal right to campaign. In the end... They should caucus.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. No, they shouldn't caucus. You don't get to do it over just because your guy lost both states. |
sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. What rubbish, they campaigned for uncommitted, they took themselves of the ballot |
|
Their fault alone. No one asked them too. The people knew what they were voting for, that shit don't fly of people didnt know.
you act as if people of florida and michigan have no tvs, internet, newspapers, eyes and ears.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. I agree. I wouldn't want MY vote going to someone I didn't vote for. n/t |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They don't get doovers. Stop wanting to change the rules. |
sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I don't want do-overs either Josh, someone has to give way somewhere |
|
I think Hillary won these fair and square but why are people so against asking the people of Florida and Michigan what they want to do, its their votes.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
21. I wouldn't worry about it, if it came down to the wire, Dean and Hillary and Obama would sit down... |
|
And the nomination would go to the one with the most pledged delegates + popular vote. Because that will essentially be the arguments that are made at the DNC.
|
Kittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. FIne then - the rules state - their delegates won't be seated. End of story. |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
20. The rules state that their vote doesn't go toward the nomination. It won't. |
|
But they can be seated. :)
Nothing in the rules say they can't be seated.
|
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
they broke the rules, were informed of the consequences, and went ahead anyway. They should get no delegates and see if they bother to follow the rules next time.
|
samdogmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 04:05 PM by samdogmom
The agreement was to NOT run in the two states and to NOT count their delegates. Everyone was in agreement UNTIL HILLARY WON! (Gee--do you think if your name is the only one on the ballot that you have an advantage?) Give me a break! If she pulls off this theft--and that's what it is--a common ROBBERY!--who do you think will respect her in the morning? Not me! EVER!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. What a crock. She spoke out about this LONG before she won. Stop whining. |
samdogmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
23. Smoke and mirrors...whatever! Politics as usual when the Clintons are involved! |
|
By the way, I love your peace dove "thingy" (sorry, don't know what to call it--but it's very catchy). Thanks! It calms me and tells me that ultimately in the end we're still going to be on the same side!
|
TheDonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
16. wtf? who would say "oh no it shouldn't" their party leaders cheated and shouldn't be rewarded |
|
If they had just followed the rules they could have really made an impact.
|
qazplm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
18. its this kind of win at any cost approach |
|
that is quickly turning me off to Clinton supporters and Clinton herself.
Obama DID NOT RUN in Michigan, he wasnt even on the ballot. Edwards, wasnt even on the ballot.
And yet now you have laughable calls to count the votes for Clinton, who was the only front runner not to take herself off the ballot.
|
sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. excuse me Obama made damn sure he told everyone to vote uncommitted |
|
He took himself off the ballot he did not have too.
|
butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message |
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Have the polls in this election season always been reliable enough? |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 04:18 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
There are a lot of new voters coming out to vote and the old polling methods may not be sufficient to include them in the proper proportional amount.
|
sunonmars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Why do you think i said a sample of about 15'000 instead of the usual 1000 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message |