Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why haven't Edwards and Gore endorsed Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:20 PM
Original message
Why haven't Edwards and Gore endorsed Obama?
My guess is that there are a couple things playing into it. Gore probably does not want to endorse Obama because he owes Bill Clinton a debt of gratitude for making him VP. The other thing is both Tipper and Elizabeth strike me as something of feminists who might support Clinton over Obama. Otherwise, it seems pretty obvious that both Gore and Edwards would support Obama because, like him, they want to change the status quo and, although Clinton and Obama have fairly similar policies, Clinton is much more part of the establishment than is Obama. Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gore is listed as one of the people to be deposed in the Paul v Clinton civil suit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Never heard of it, but it sounds like it's going nowhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustDavid Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why haven't Edwards and Gore endorsed Obama?
Because they don't like him.

next question...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton's UHC is a carbon copy of Edwards'
That is another reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why do Obamites assume St. Obama is entitled to Edwards' and Gore's endorsements?
Gore is the establishment. Gore was born into political royalty. Gore helped found the DLC. Gore was the DLC's first presidential candidate. Gore was VP for 8 years and then the presidential nominee.

Maybe they simply don't see much of a difference between HillBama? Obama is as establishment as Hillary. Look at where every major endorsement besides Water's has gone since Iowa (Boxer's endorsement is a joke since she didn't choose a candidate but decided to support the candidate her state voted for). Obama leads more than 3-to-1 in newspaper endorsements. Obama gets far better press coverage than Hillary. He is as establishment, if not more establishment, than Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Because Edwards ran as anti-status quo
and HRC is status quo. Because Gore was totally BURNED by the Clintons. Maybe Gore helped found the DLC but I think he had an epiphany after 2000 about what it had become. There's no way in he** Gore will endorse Clinton - it's either Obama or no endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. How is Barack less status quo than Hillary?
You're selling Gore short. He cares about America and the world. He won't endorse out of spite. I am sure Gore is looking at their policies.

Gore had an epiphany after being in politics for five decades, including 15 years in the DLC? Gore has, as far as I know, never said he no longer agrees with the DLC's basic message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're joking, right?
Barack just as status quo as HRC? :eyes:

If you're referring to his "establishment" endorsements, I think those who are supporting him are expressing their desire for a Democratic Party that ISN'T dominated by the Clintons. His win in Iowa gave those legislators the courage to finally stand up to the Clintons and DARE to support someone other than Bill or Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Which means the esablishment is against the Clintons
:)

How can a "change" candidate beat a status quo candidate by more than 3-to-1 in corporate media newspaper endorsements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obviously you don't know what Hillary did to Tipper
to say that. Tipper and Hillary were great friends when they started out in the early 90's and when Hillary didn't need her anymore she just gave up on the friendship and I read a bunch of stories about Tipper being hurt by it as she thought they were "real" friends.

Don't be looking for anything for Hillary from either of the Gore's. As for Edwards I would guess he wants to be in the cabinet of either person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Elizabeth Edwards does NOT like Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC