Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALERT: Any update on this MI delegate news out of the SoS's office??!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:18 PM
Original message
ALERT: Any update on this MI delegate news out of the SoS's office??!!!!!
This sounds pretty bad. Whether you're for Hillary or Obama, this delegate mess will turn off all voters no matter who their for.!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4490194
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not strip both states of their delegates AND Super Delegates-
it's their fault anyway-and just decide the nomination on the majority of what's left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We the people of Michigan did not vote to change the date of our
primary. Why should our voices not be heard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So, do you think this should go ahead? Should the votes be counted?
I'm a Hillary supporter so I want her to get every delegate she can,but, I think this would be a huge problem down the road. MI only had HRC (and a few others) on the ballot, this was a clear disadvantage to the other candidates. Not fair and a big problem, as I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The candidates who took their names off the ballot were pandering to the early states.
There was no requirement or agreement to do it:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22054151/
Democratic candidates John Edwards, Barack Obama, Bill Richardson and Joe Biden have withdrawn their names from the ballot to satisfy Iowa and New Hampshire, which were unhappy Michigan was challenging their leadoff status on the primary calendar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Because you will be called nasty names by the Obama
supporters? :shrug: I have been repeatedly told that "party rules" are sacred, yet Michigan law forbidding a second primary can get screwed. Our delegates will NOT be seated, nor will their votes count for the nomination, however it seems acceptable to some that the Super Delegates - who created this mess - should still be allowed to vote. I oppose that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I hear you. I just don't want to divide the party any more w/ this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. What did the voters do to stop the change of date?
If they count the primary already taken, it disenfranchises a lot of MI voters, too.

There are consequences that come with choices. I hope you'll hold your Party leaders accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Apparently that choice was made by the Michigan Legislature and
was approved by the Michigan Supreme Court. This was done with full knowledge of the rules set forth by the DNC and the fact that their delegates would be stripped by the DNC and they did it anyway. It sucks, but you cannot expect to violate the rules and not suffer the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's impossible to reconcile Obama's fans whining about those "undemocratic" superdelegates while
insisting that the voters in MI and FL be disenfranchised.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree, but, won't this be a major problem. It's unfair to the other candidates and will be a
problem for HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Clinton did not campaign in MI. Conyers campaigned for Obama.
Obama campaigned in FL where his name was on the ballot.

Again, there was no agreement or pledge to remove the names from the ballots anywhere.

The only people whining that it's unfair are the Obama fans because his cheating, by campaigning in MI and FL, and pandering, by taking his name off the MI ballot, blew up in his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They don't want SuperDelegates but they embrace Caucus style voting - Hypocracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. They weren't disenfranchised...
If you show up to vote on the wrong day and your vote isn't counted, you are not being disenfranchised. The Democratic Party can create their own rules as to who, what, when, where, and how people in the Democratic Party vote. If the voters their don't like it too bad. The constitution does not mandate that people have the right to vote for anything other than elected office. This election is for the nomination of a party: thus no guarantee to vote. The voters and MI and FL were given the opportunity to select delegates to the National Party. They choose not to follow the necessary rules. Too bad for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The Democratic Party created the superdelegate rules, too. I notice you fail
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 01:03 PM by Yossariant
to address the fact that those rules were in effect before the primary process began so complaining and trying to change them now is no different than wanting to count all the votes of people who actually took the time to show up and vote.

Obama wants to find the rules "inconvenient" when it suits his ageneda and insist on their enforcement when it does not suit his agenda.

No hypocrisy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. MI and FL delegates will NOT count toward the nominee.
They may have seats at the convention, and they may be given back their hotel rooms....but they will not count toward picking the nominee.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1795
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What about our Super Delegates?
Does their vote count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I heard they did not....not sure.
Trying to find a definitive statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thank you for your reply, madfloridian!
I hope they won't since it's all their fault anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC