|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
peoli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:54 PM Original message |
Update from Omaha - from barackobama.com thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. holy crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. WOW!!! WOW!! What else can a person say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. It sounds like the Hillary people went home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chieftain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Go Huskers ! GoBama! (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. Whoa. That sounds almost impossible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. What was the projection for Omaha? (Not for percentages, just who was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fenriswolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. how many delegates is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. The entire state of Nebraska has 31 delegates up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Sweeeeet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. Talk about a cult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. i dont get you at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. OK, now I'm confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Sadly I think this may have as much to do with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. How can justify a margin like that among thinking people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. i think that's how much red state dems DON'T want her on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. red counties have overwhelmingly gone for Hillary.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. that's not true. For instance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. I think that, if you are truly an Obama supporter, you should be happy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. A ray of light in an otherwise otherworldly thread nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. I would think that, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #27 |
46. not when the landslide is totally unrealistic.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Ya' think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. In the Republican party, McCain was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bilgewaterbill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Maybe it's because the people ARE thinking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. I agree onlooker.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. That said, my issue is not so much with Obama ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
45. Perhaps the feminists voted for Obama n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
51. Skin color is not a good reason to support Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. We've been chosing our presidents for 230 years ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. I know...which makes me wonder about Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. I still think he will win. He will have about a week to campaign here in Wisco. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. what? You're a little confused on your geography |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. He's cut Hillary's once 20-point lead down to 9. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. I agree. The landslide victories of FDR and LBJ greatly disturbed me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. They didn't come close to 98% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
52. Candidates win landslides in individual precincts all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
56. FDR won South Carolina by that exact margin in 1936. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. One thing that I think it happening.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
54. Yeah, how dare we have a popular Democratic candidate for president! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
58. Bleachers gave the likely explanation upthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
60. Don't feed the trolls,this one is very hungry andclearly not an Obama supporter.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. Tremendous! K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. Holy shit...Jesus Marion Joseph!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
15. Day-um! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
18. The Nebraska caucuses are on steroids!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. Here's to the Change Washington Social Movement!!!! Congratulations for waking up NE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. uh oh k and r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
29. Here is another update: Live updates from the Nebraska Democratic caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. not good. In fact, very, very bad. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. My Mom left her Kansas caucus without caucusing. They were waiting for hours outside in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Upcoming states...PLEASE take notice!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
57. Another hopeful post from your link... "The lines of people switching parties is long." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
34. EXCELLENT. WTG America. This is exciting, feels like something big hapening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
40. This is all very incredible! However... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
47. God what a disaster, why haven't these states learned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
49. YES! GO OBAMA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
59. Woo Hoo !!! - K & R !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LordJFT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
61. how many delegates is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC