ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:30 PM
Original message |
Checkout these latest CNN results....link |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. Clinton has 101 more delegates thanObama. Fantastic! |
|
But I guess that won't last long as today's final results come in. Hillary isn't expected to win any states. I just hope she gets a fair share of delegates. I don't know, maybe some of them are already included in this tally. We'll just have to be patient.
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. You know those aren't ELECTED delegates, don't you? In elected delegates, |
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
23. You know that total delegates is what gets you the nomination, don't you? nt |
Zueda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
28. You know one left her the other day, dont you? |
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
29. Obama lost one to Clinton, too. nt |
Zueda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
25. Yes, I know it includes super delegates and that's what will count in the end. |
|
Whether that is fair or not is another question...but that is the rule now so we'll have to live with it.
|
Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. What am I supposed to be looking at? |
BenDavid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Very good, very good indeed....Now if obama were a man of his |
|
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 04:34 PM by BenDavid
word he would drop out because he or his campaign manager said if they were behind by a 100 delegates after super tuesday they could not win the nomination.....so I say drop out obama and be a man of your word......do the romey thing and go.....
|
Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
godai
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Your facts are wrong. Obama campaign EXPECTED to be about 100 delegates behind. |
|
But, I'm sure you know that. Neither candidate will have enough delegates at the end of the primaries. That's a fact. Check back after next Tuesday and we'll see how the delegate count looks then.
|
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Road to the White House, Delegates Needed to Win: |
|
Clinton 1,063 Obama 962 Edwards 26
Thanks. :hi:
|
godai
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Thanks...includes Superdelegates, Hillary +92 over Obama |
|
First time I've seen the SD included. Interesting snapshot.
|
thoughtcrime1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Why does cbsnews show 1076-1014? |
|
cnn has the biggest gap I have seen, for sure.
|
godai
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. It has to be how the Superdelgates are being allocated. |
|
I think there is some wiggle room there at this time.
|
pdxmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. I have yet to find two sources who agree on a delegate count. I've looked |
|
at CNN, MSNBC, CBS, realclearpolitics.com, FOX, The Washington Post, the LA Times and others, and no one has similar numbers. So, in my mind, all of these are useless.
|
Frances
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
24. It is confusing, isn't it? |
|
I have decided just to wait for more states to vote before I try to figure out the real count.
|
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It hasn't worked out as well as "inevitable" Hillary planned. |
|
Was it Mark Penn who said she would have it wrapped up by super tuesday?
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. anyone know when today's results will come in ? |
|
what time and for which states ?
|
housewolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 04:41 PM by housewolf
|
UALRBSofL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. Those numbers look like Arkansas numbers |
|
except reverse the candidate. :)
|
bilgewaterbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. Kansas voted Tuesday. |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
15. When she gets to the 150-200 delegate count over Obama, or vise versa |
|
it will be time for the runner-up to concede. Please, lets avoid nasty scenarios with the superdelegates choosing.
|
thoughtcrime1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. She'd be behind by a few if not for the SD's |
|
So, nobody is even near those numbers you speak of. Probably won't be at any point, unless you count SD's, and even then, I doubt it.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. She's up by nine, not counting the supers. I am referring to that number. |
|
If one or the other can break away and get to 150 up in pledged delegates, well, even 100, then they should stop there.
I agree with you that it is very unlikely that one will break away.
It is going to get a little sticky in the coming months. I don't like where it's heading.
|
thoughtcrime1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. O will be ahead after tonight, regardless of which site you use |
|
But, yes, it may get ugly if this goes to the convention. Neither candidate is going to blink.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
NastyRiffraff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. I support Hlllary but that picture is funny! |
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
32. Yes, they are obsolete... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |