Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton campaign wants to lower expectations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:02 PM
Original message
Clinton campaign wants to lower expectations
From the Seattle Times:

This is from the campaign of Hillary Clinton:

Tonight there are contests in three states that the Obama campaign has long predicted they would win by large margins. According to a spreadsheet that was obtained by Bloomberg News, the Obama campaign predicted big victories in Washington State, Nebraska and Louisiana.

The Obama campaign has dramatically outspent our campaign in these three states, saturating the airwaves with 30 and 60 second ads. The Obama campaign has spent $300,000 more in Louisiana on television ads, $190,000 more in Nebraska and $175,000 more in Washington.

Although the next several states that hold nominating contests this month are more favorable to the Obama campaign, we will continue to compete in them and hope to secure as many delegates as we can before the race turns to Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania.


As a Clinton supporter, even I can see an obvious attempt to gloss over what's likely to be a bad evening.

I'm concerned that Hillary may attempting a "Rudy" strategy of accepting a continuing string of losses while trying for a firewall in Ohio several weeks from now. If Obama takes the Chesapeake states and follows with a win in Wisconsin, the momentum shift may be unstoppable.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marcellobarrios Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. The question is, isn't it true that Obama was supposed to win these states
by a large margin?

If you thought Clinton would win the WA caucus, for example, you must not have been reading polls or watching news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed but they seem to be covering for potential losses in NE and LA as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He wasn't even supposed to make it this far against Miss Inevitable. just say'n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Anybody that looked at the polls would know Obama was favored
So are you saying she wasn't telling the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. so what?
when she sweeps the big states later on, the Obama camp will be spinning. Is this really a surprise to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary. She's ready with a list of excuses on Day One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL! True!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Ha Ha LOL!!
:spank: Bad! bad! Bad TX! This is going to hurt you more than me!! :toast: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. ROFLMAO
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC