rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:15 PM
Original message |
Obama supporters: Superdelegates must follow the will of the people |
|
Time passes.
Oh shit, what about MA, CA & NY? What about NJ?
What about all those large states with the most superdelegates that ended up voting for Hillary?
Personally I think its a bad idea to have superdelegates follow the states vote because
a) what would be the point of having them as a winner take all measure when all delegates are proportional?
b) How do you proportion votes from party leaders?
So let them vote, chances are they will pick the popular vote/delegate winner by the 2nd ballot.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Agreed, though that doesnt mean I wont be calling Tammy Baldwin if Obama wins big in Madison |
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It'll Come Down To How Many Jobs Bill Clinton Can Secure |
|
with Ron Burkle for superdelegate family members.
A nailbiter, to be sure.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. We know St. Obama would never engage in backdoor dealing! |
EmperorHasNoClothes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but I don't see the point in having superdelegates if they're just going to mirror the will of their constituents.
Then again, I don't really think they're going to go against the will of their constituents en mass either, at least not in a primary with two viable, mainstream candidates.
|
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I don't see a point in having them either. |
|
It's just giving the party aristocrats a veto over the voice of the peasants, a situation I don't find acceptable.
Hopefully, the superdelegates will see the wisdom of voting with the people in this election - overriding the pledged delegates is sure to result in a Denver riot.
But for 2012, we need to eliminate superdelegates completely. Maybe switch to instant-runoff voting, so the people can vote for all of their chosen nominees, but still have a voice if their first choices get eliminated.
|
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Barack's first position was to follow the states, then he, too, did the math. |
|
Now, he says that the superdelegates he has, he should keep, but the rest of the uncommitted superdelegates should vote for the candidate with the post pledged delegates, overall. :shrug: This is all just another tactic being used by his campaign to "inspire" and "unify" his supporters around his victim status.
|
Blue State Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Super "D"'s got to think about more than just looking good.... |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 02:31 PM by ingin
2/1-4/08 Clinton-46 McCain-46 2/1-4/08 Obama-48 McCain41 Pick your coat tails wisely. http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |