|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:32 AM Original message |
Why is there so much anger directed towards Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. Um, there was this thing called the 2000 election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I blame the supreme court and the 2 party establishment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
21. Them too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
51. Would've Never Made It There If It Weren't For That Piece Of Shit Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. LOL thank you for calling me an ignorant braindead fucker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Are You Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I agree with Nader on alot so yes, I'm gonna sound like him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Well Then I Guess You Are. My Bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. LOL, so which of Nader's policies do you disagree with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #52 |
105. I was wondering when Nader lovers would show up. When old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
45. Simple: Nader is a self-righteous egotistical gadfly. His presence on the 2000 FL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
60. He did it. His candidacy in 2000 allowed the GOP to steal the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem (880 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
79. I blame Gore for not carrying his home state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. Why is there so much hatred towards Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
73. He made quite a few bucks off it too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. because he's a selfish f*ck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. Nader's corporate reform hasn't been embraced by the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
6. Here's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. your link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
8. Who do you think is *really* backing his run? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. The anger is because he knew how close the election was going to be in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. But wheres the anger towards all the people I talked about in my first post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhrobbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
82. I actually disagree with you about Nader, but I'm not going to call you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RuleOfNah (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
86. If they didn't understand 2000... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galadrium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. If he actually believes what he says he stands for he NEEDS to step aside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. There's no reason for his candidacy except his own ego |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
12. Ralph Nader is not running as a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoJoWorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
13. Nader appears to be an opportunist who looks for divides in the Democratic party and exploits them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
14. Yep, that's just right if nader runs he is allowed we just have to work to earn his voters too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Thank you, I wish more people would see it like this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Yeah, except he's done NOTHING to insure that there is a viable third party. NOTHING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Predators make the prey ten times sharper. I think! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
18. The MFer disappears for 4 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
19. Watch the news much, the last seven years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
22. how new are you to democratic politics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paperbag_ princess (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
23. irony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
63. Obama is a Democrat, Nader is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paperbag_ princess (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. I can see your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
24. Yes, that's the high school text book view of elections in the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. We dont have to be forever locked in a 2 part system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Right. But guess what. Building another party actually entails work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #25 |
41. Perot lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. We don't have to switch to Parliament. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Perot was acting crazy at the beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
26. He lies and says that there is little difference between the two major parties. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
27. Our voting system lets a 3rd-party candidate screw up the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Yeah thats what Im trying to say in my first post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Ahhh, the anger towards Nader upsets you? Bill Maher and Michael Moore got on their knees and begged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. When did I say I love him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Keep defending Nader here against so called bashing. We've seen this song and dance before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
78. You can say that again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #78 |
110. OMG, I was hoping this would go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Keep defending Nader here against so called bashing. We've seen this song and dance before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
97. You can say that again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Keep defending Nader here against so called bashing. We've seen this song and dance before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Keep defending Nader here against so called bashing. We've seen this song and dance before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
31. He takes money from Rich Repukes to fund his runs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mindfulNJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Thats it in a nutshell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
74. So does Sen. Clinton. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
34. because his actions work against what he says he wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
40. Nader belonged in the Weimarer Republik |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
42. Because he's a threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
43. Because he's a self-absorbed RW-funded fuckwit who exists only to enable Repukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
46. I don't suffer tools or fools gladly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
48. Much anger toward Nader is displaced from the POWERFUL to him as a convenient target ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
49. Nader is a has been, most people won't be stupid enough to vote for him n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaDooRonRon (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
81. Hillary Clinton is a corporate wet dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
50. the fact is, most on DU prefer the two-party system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellerpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #50 |
67. Will everyone who is still mad at Teddy Roosevelt please check in? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
55. Fear of our own party's weaknesses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
56. Ralph Nader has positioned himself as an enemy of the two major |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
59. Nader is for Nader, nothing more, nothing less... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaDooRonRon (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #59 |
87. Let us put your theory to the test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. Ahem, my post was about Nader, not some entity you have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaDooRonRon (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. You didn't answer my question, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. An answer for you...DU does not support 3rd Party candidates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaDooRonRon (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. My mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RuleOfNah (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #59 |
88. I would counter your flimsy arguments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
61. Because he is funded by Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
62. The blood of all those in the Iraq war is on his hands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. LOL, you are ignoring me for basically showing support for an issue our candidate (Obama) supports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
65. Oh, I can think of about 97,488 reasons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
68. The man is an egotistical selfish greedy asshole who ran not to win but to spoil it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
69. "My anger is towards people who undemocratically keep the current power system." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
70. Are you a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. I voted for Obama in the primary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. Yes and so you possibly should be as angry at Ralphie as anyone else here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. The thing is I cant be angry at a man for running for office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. Those elements get plenty of notice, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryster (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
72. I can tell you why I'm so angry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
76. By far, the most puzzling, jaw-gaping, shocking subject line I've ever seen on an OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
77. Because he runs just to be a spoiler. He's all ego. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
83. Because he is taking GOP money to run and disrupt the Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Thanks for bringing this up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
89. You really think he cares about progressive values? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
90. Now that you have had your fun, please leave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. lol you're a great person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. I said what I said because I am not a crude person and I don't post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. are you saying DU does not support Democracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Of course you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. So you spend your time trying not to just be a dick, but to be a stupid dick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Thank you. Goodbye. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. You have lost your soul and your conscience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
92. Why is there so much anger directed towards Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
103. Because he's not helping the causes he says he champions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
106. "Running for president is the American dream" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
107. Oh poo - I missed popcorn again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
108. Yep, he has the right to run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
109. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC